Page 40 - ARNM-1-2
P. 40

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                               Single-channel applicators for cervical cancer




            Table 4. Patients and disease characteristics at baseline ready for treatment and comparison of toxicity between SCA and FAS
             Characteristic                 SCA (n=19)                 FAS (n=22)                 P‑value
            Age (years)                                                                            0.863
             Range                            41–65                      36–69
             Median                            51                         53
            Pathology (n [%])                                                                      0.861
             Squamous cell carcinoma         16 (84.21)                 20 (90.91)
             Adenocarcinoma                  3 (15.79)                   2 (9.09)
            Staging (n [%])                                                                        0.426
             IIA                             5 (26.32)                   2 (9.09)
             IIB                             10 (52.63)                 16 (72.73)
             IIIA                            3 (15.79)                   2 (9.09)
             IIIB                             1 (5.26)                   2 (9.09)
            ECOG score (n [%])                                                                     0.563
             0                               8 (42.11)                  12 (54.55)
             1                               10 (52.63)                 8 (36.36)
             2                                1 (5.26)                   2 (9.09)
            Acute toxicity  (n [%])      B            R             B            R          B 0.689     R 0.344
                     a
             0                        11 (57.89)    8 (42.11)    14 (63.64)    14 (63.64)
             1                        7 (36.84)     9 (47.37)     5 (22.73)    6 (27.27)
             2                         1 (5.26)     2 (10.53)     2 (9.09)     2 (9.09)
             3                                                    1 (4.55)
                   b
            Late injury  (n [%])         B            R             B            R          B 0.860     R 0.850
             0                        14 (73.68)    15 (78.95)   15 (68.18)    14 (63.64)
             1                        4 (21.05)     3 (15.79)     6 (27.27)    5 (22.73)
             2                         1 (5.26)     1 (5.26)      1 (4.55)     2 (9.09)
             3                                                                 1 (4.55)
            Notes: B represents bladder, and R represents rectum.  Acute toxicity means toxicity to the bladder and rectum over the course of treatment or within
                                               a
            3 months post-treatment (F-test-based method).  Late injury means injury to the bladder and rectum after 3 months post-treatment (F-test-based
                                            b
            method).
            Abbreviations: FAS: Fletcher applicator set; SCA: Single-channel applicator.
            applications. Based on our study, irradiation to point A,   Funding
            point B, and point R, was equal between the SCA and FAS,
            showing no significant differences (P > 0.05) in both acute   This work was supported by grants from the Supported
            and late toxic effects during follow-up.           Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan
                                                               Province (Z1443) and the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest
            5. Conclusions                                     Medical University (14004).
            We found that the SCA was superior to the FAS on the   Conflict of interest
            grounds of its more simplified procedure of brachytherapy.
            Nevertheless, despite the promising potential of the SCA,   The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
            further prospective validation studies are needed before
            considering it as a possible alternative for those unwilling   Author contributions
            to undergo brachytherapy using the FAS.            Conceptualization: Jing-Bo Wu
                                                               Investigation: Hao-Wen Pang, Xiang-Xiang Shi
            Acknowledgments                                    Writing – original draft: Ren-Jin Chen, Lei Yang

            None.                                              Writing – review & drafting: Sheng Lin



            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2023)                         6                       https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.0322
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45