Page 34 - DP-2-1
P. 34

Design+                                                          Digital art illustration and design in Zimbabwe



            31.  Garcia MB. The paradox of artificial creativity: Challenges      doi: 10.1557/s43579-023-00489-1
               and opportunities of generative AI artistry.  Creat Res J.   42.  AVAC Arts.  Zimbabwe  Visual  Arts  Industry  in  Doldrums.
               2024:1-14.
                                                                  AVAC Arts; 2017. Available from: https://avacarts.com/
               doi: 10.1080/10400419.2024.2354622                 zimbabwe-visual-arts-industry-in-doldrums/2017/01/15
            32.  Sahnir N, Jamilah, Yatim H. Pengenalan teknologi Artificial   [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 19].
               Intelligence (AI) dalam meningkatkan pengalaman belajar   43.  Mushohwe K.  Children and Art Education. The Herald;
               seni di era digitalisasi pendidikan. Semin Nas Dies Natali.   2015. Available from: https://www.herald.co.zw/children-
               2023;62:245-256.                                   and-art-education [Last accessed on 2024 Jun 20].
               doi: 10.59562/semnasdies.v1i1.811               44.  Makoni TZ.  Does Animation Have a Future in Zimbabwe?
            33.  Gong Y. Application of virtual reality teaching method   Comexposed; 2018. Available from: https://www.comexposed.
               and artificial intelligence technology in digital media art   com/blog/does-animation-have-a-future-in-zimbabwe [Last
               creation. Ecol Inform. 2021;63:101304.             accessed on 2024 Oct 20].
               doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101304               45.  Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative
                                                                  Research. United States: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2011.
            34.  Zhang W, Shankar A, Antonidoss A. Modern art education
               and teaching based on artificial intelligence. J Interconnect   46.  Maxwell J.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive
               Networks. 2022;22(Suppl 1).                        Approach: An Interactive Approach. United States: SAGE
                                                                  Publications Ltd; 2013.
                doi: 10.1142/S021926592141005X
                                                               47.  Hossain MI, Hussain MI, Akther A. E-commerce platforms
            35.  Zhao X, Zhao X. Application of generative artificial   in  developing  economies:  Unveiling  behavioral  intentions
               intelligence in film image production.  Comput  Aided  Des   through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Open J Bus
               Appl. 2024;21:15-28.                               Manag. 2023;11(6):2988-3020.
               doi: 10.14733/cadaps.2024.S27.15-28                doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2023.116165
            36.  Yusa  IMM,  Yu  Y,  Sovhyra  T.  Reflections  on  the  use  of   48.  Al-Adwan AS, Li N, Al-Adwan A, Abbasi GA, Albelbisi  NA,
               artificial intelligence in works of art.  J  Aesthet Des Art   Habibi A. Correction to: “Extending the Technology
               Manag. 2022;2(2):152-167.                          Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict university students’
               doi: 10.58982/jadam.v2i2.334                       intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms”. Educ
                                                                  Inf Technol. 2023;29:2583-2584.
            37.  Ernst H. Artificial: A Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence
               in Art;  2023.  Available  from:  https://digitalcommons.     doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11913-3
               unomaha.edu/university_honors_programhttps://   49.  Ajibade P. Technology acceptance model limitations and
               unomaha.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form [Last accessed on 2024   criticisms: Exploring the practical applications and use in
               Oct 19].
                                                                  technology-related studies,  mixedmethod, and qualitative
            38.  Zabora V, Kasianenko K, Pashukova S, Alforova Z,   researches. Libr Philos Pract. 2018:1-13.
               Shmehelska Y. Digital art in designing an artistic image. Rev   50.  Mardoyo E, Lubis M, Bhaskoro SB. Evaluasi virtual
               Amazonia Investig. 2023;12(64):300-305.
                                                                  reality menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model
               doi: 10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.31                     (TAM) Terkait Dunia Metaverse. J Sist Cerdas. 2022;5(3):
                                                                  182-194.
            39.  Ozdemir D. A conceptual framework on the relationship of
               digital technology and art. Int J Soc Educ Sci. 2022;4(1):121-134.     doi: 10.37396/jsc.v5i3.250
               doi: 10.46328/ijonses.313                       51.  Bryant A, Charmaz K.  The SAGE  Handbook of Grounded
            40.  El Hajj M. The future of digital arts. Int J Educ Learn Res.   Theory. United States: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2007.
               2023;5:109-129.                                    doi: 10.4135/9781848607941
               doi: 10.21608/ijelr.2023.211965.1002            52.  Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. An array of qualitative data
            41.  Nocheseda CJC, Santos MFA, Espera AH Jr., Advincula  RC.   analysis tools: A  call for data analysis triangulation.  Sch
               3D digital manufacturing technologies, materials, and artificial   Psychol Q. 2007;22(4):557-584.
               intelligence in art. MRS Commun. 2023;13(6):1102-1118.     doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557










            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         11                               doi: 10.36922/dp.4342
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39