Page 74 - EER-2-1
P. 74

Explora: Environment
            and Resource                                                                Sustainable urban park design



            22.  Ibes DC. Sustainable urban park systems.  Cities Environ.   A conceptual framework. City Cult Soc. 2022;29:100460.
               2014;7(2):8.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2022.100460
            23.  Yıldızcı AC, Yücel GF. Setting quality criteria in city parks.   36.  Bennett E, Helms R, Hermann A, et al. Leveraging Parks and
               İTÜ Derg Mimarlık P Tas. 2006;5(2):220-230.        Playgrounds in Pekin. Campbellsburg,  and Salem:   Kelley
               doi: 10.33613/antropolojidergisi.633411            School of Business; 2021.
            24.  Bahriny F, Bell S. Patterns of urban park use and their   37.  Padial-Ruz  R,  Puga-González  ME,  Céspedes-Jiménez  A,
               relationship to factors of quality: A case study of Tehran,   Cabello-Manrique D. Determining factors in the use of
               Iran. Sustainability. 2020;12(4):1560.             urban parks that influence the practice of physical activity
                                                                  in  children:  A  systematic  review.  Int J Environ Res Public
               doi: 10.3390/su12041560
                                                                  Health. 2021;18(7):3648.
            25.  Gong L, Mao B, Qi Y, Xu C. A satisfaction analysis of the      doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073648
               infrastructure of country parks in Beijing.  Urb For Urb
               Green. 2015;14:480-489.                         38.  Sanmargaraja S, Seow TW, Radzuan ISM, Fazri M. Inclusıve
                                                                  landscape design for the recreational parks: Case study in
               doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.013
                                                                  kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysıa.  Environ Manage
            26.  Kalansooriya J. Sustainability assessment of park studies in   Sustain Dev. 2019;11: 548-562.
               Sri Lanka: A comprehensive review. Int J Adv Multidiscipl
               Res Stud. 2023;3(4):290-299.                    39.  Kurtaslan BO. Examination of Selcuk University Alaaddin
                                                                  Keykubat Campus in the context of ecological landscape
            27.  Sultana S. An Innovation approach towards transforming a   design. J Environ Biol. 2020;41(2):463-474.
               urban park to a sustainable park. J Emerg Techn Innov Res.      doi: 10.22438/jeb/41/2(SI)/JEB-33
               2022;9(5): 335-344.
                                                               40.  Safarkhani M.  Sustainable Park Model: A  Qualitative
            28.  Trojanowska M. Assessment of sustainability and health
               promotion of three public parks  in Poland’s Pomerania   Approach in Sustainability Assessment of Parks. (Doctoral
               Region. Bull Geog Socio-economic Ser. 2024;64:117-136.  Dissertation İTÜ, İstanbul); 2023.
                                                               41.  Chen J, Tao Z, Wu W, Wang L, Chen D. Influence of Urban
               doi: 10.12775/bgss-2024-0017
                                                                  park pathway features on the density and intensity of
            29.  Di Simone L, Petracci B, Piva M. Economic sustainability,   walking and running. Land. 2024;13(2):156.
               innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation.      doi: 10.3390/land13020156
               Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2270.
                                                               42.  Van Renswouw L, Neerhof J, Vos S, Van Wesemael P,
               doi: 10.3390/su14042270
                                                                  Lallemand C. Sensation: Sonifying the Urban Running
            30.  Akkurt Y,  Akten  M. Kent  parklarinda ekosistem   Experience.  In:  Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI
               hizmetlerinin rolü. J Arch Sci Appl. 2021;6(1):348-357.  Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2021.
               doi: 10.30785/mbud.812292                          p. 1-5.
                                                                  doi: 10.1145/3411763.3451788
            31.  Velásquez C, Espín F, Castro M, Rodríguez F. Energy efficiency
               in public lighting systems friendly to the environment and   43.  Song Y, Fernandez J, Wang T. Understanding perceived site
               protected areas. Sustainability. 2024;16(12):5113.  qualities and experiences of urban public spaces: A  case
                                                                  study of social media reviews in Bryant Park, New York City.
               doi: 10.3390/su16125113
                                                                  Sustainability. 2020;12(19):8036.
            32.  Kindler  M,  Vivoni  E,  Perez‐Ruiz  ER,  Wang  Z. Water
               conservation potential of modified turf grass irrigation      doi: 10.3390/su12198036
               in urban parks of Phoenix, Arizona.  Ecohydrology.   44.  SPSS, IBM SPSS Version 29.0.1. Boston, Mass: International
               2022;15(3):e2399.                                  Business Machines Corp; 2023.
               doi: 10.1002/eco.2399                           45.  Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size
                                                                  recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test.
            33.  Ignatieva  M,  Haase  D,  Dushkova  D,  Haase  A.  Lawns  in
               cities: From a globalised urban green space phenomenon to   2005;5(2):159-168.
               sustainable nature-based solutions. Land. 2020;9(3):73.     doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
               doi: 10.3390/land9030073                        46.  Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience
            34.  Chao  KW.  Symbiotic Urban Parks: Exploring Design   sampling and purposive sampling.  Am J Theor Appl Stat.
               Aesthetics, User Experiences and Ecological Services (Doctoral   2016;5(1):1-4.
               dissertation, University of Guelph); 2015.         doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
            35.  Freestone R, Favaro P. The social sustainability of smart cities:   47.  Bowling A, Shah E. Handbook of Health Research Methods:


            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025)                         18                               doi: 10.36922/eer.5839
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79