Page 117 - GHES-2-3
P. 117

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                     Prevalence and causes of medication transcription errors


            World Health Organization, 2017). Hospitalized patients   2. Methods
            are particularly vulnerable to harm from medication errors
            due to the severity of their illness, complex medication   2.1. Study setting and design
            regimens, and fragility (Shawahna  et al., 2019; World   This study was carried out at Mboppi Baptist Hospital, a
            Health Organization, 2017).                        faith-based hospital in Douala, Cameroon. All inpatients

              Errors can occur at any stage of the hospital medication   admitted into the pediatric and general ward (which
            use process, including prescription, transcription,   included both medical and surgical patients) during the
            dispensing, and administration. A recent systematic review   study period (April 1 – April 31, 2021) were considered for
            of medication errors in African hospitals estimated that   inclusion. The pediatric and general wards have a capacity
            errors occur in up to eight patients per 100 admissions. The   of 38 and 50 beds, respectively. Nursing staff working in
            majority of the medication errors reported was prescription   these wards were also surveyed to gather their opinions
            and administration errors, and no study specifically examined   about the causes of MTEs. During the study period, there
            transcription errors in hospital settings (Mekonnen  et al.,   were  20  nurses  in  the  pediatric  ward  and  37  nurses  in
            2018). Many hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa still  use  a   the general ward. The pediatric ward was staffed by three
            paper-based system, where written doctor’s prescriptions   general practitioners and one pediatrician, all responsible
            are often transcribed by nurses, posing a risk for errors.   for prescribing medications to patients. Similarly, in the
            However, most of these institutions lack a system for   general ward, two general practitioners, one internist, and
            monitoring medication transcription errors (MTEs) (Hartel   two general surgeons handled the medication prescriptions.
            et al., 2011; Shawahna et al., 2019). Evidence suggests that   This  study was  a  prospective  observational  chart
            the majority of medication errors occur at the transcription   review aimed at service improvement, focusing on
            stage (Ali et al., 2017), yet there is limited information on the   patients admitted to the selected wards. In addition, the
            burden of MTEs within hospital settings in Africa.  study included a survey of nurses working within those
              In Mboppi Baptist Hospital, medicines are administered   wards. The hospital administration and the senior nursing
            to patients within the wards following this protocol (Figure 1):   supervisor were informed of the rationale for the study.
            The doctor manually writes all new prescriptions in the   To prevent bias, ward heads and nurses were blinded by
            patient’s chart, then the nursing staff transcribes every new   informing them that this activity was a routine pharmacy
            prescription onto the patient’s medication administration   technician ward medicine review. When MTEs that
            sheet, which includes the list of all medications the patient   could cause harm to the patients were identified, the
            is on during admission. The nurse also transcribes each   clinical pharmacist was informed and intervened to make
            medication ordered into a separate dispensing card, which   corrections. The study was carried out in accordance with
            is taken to the inpatient pharmacy for the collection of daily   the Declaration of Helsinki (Kong et al., 2014).
            supplies using the unit dose dispensing system. Every time
            a medication is administered, the nurse documents it on   2.2. Definition of MTEs
            the medication administration sheet. Details documented   We adopted a consensus definition for MTEs from a study
            include the name, dose, dosage form/route, frequency,   that used the Delphi technique among a panel of nursing
            and duration where specified. Transcription errors could   health-care professionals in Palestine. MTEs were defined
            occur at two stages of the medication use process: When   as any discrepancy between the doctor’s medication order
            each medication order is transferred (i) to the medication   and the medication order transcribed onto the medication
            administration sheet or (ii) to the individual dispensing   administration sheet and/or the individual dispensing card
            cards.                                             (Shawahna et al., 2019).
              The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence
            and  types  of  MTEs  and  to  assess  nurses’  perceptions  of   2.3. Data collection
            the likely causes of MTEs within the pediatric and general   Demographic information collected included age, gender,
            wards in a faith-based hospital in Cameroon.       and the number of medications ordered.


                                 Transcription                                                 documentation
             Prescription (patient chart)  (medication  Transcription  Preparation and  Administration  (medication
                                 administration  (dispensing card)  dispensing                 administration
                                   sheet)                                                        sheet)

                  Physician                 Nurse                 Pharmacy                Nurse
                                   Figure 1. Inpatient medication use process. Image created using Microsoft Word


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         2                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2457
   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122