Page 118 - GHES-2-3
P. 118

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                     Prevalence and causes of medication transcription errors


              The medical records of 75  patients (30 from the   3. Results
            pediatric ward and 45 from the general ward) were
            reviewed daily throughout the study period. One of the   3.1. Demographic characteristics of study patients
            researcher’s extracted details of each medication ordered   A total of 578 medication orders were issued for 75 patients
            during the admission and compared them to the nurses’   admitted in the pediatric and general wards during the study
            transcriptions onto the medication administration sheet   period. Of the participants, 40 (53.3%) were female (Table 1).
            and the individual dispensing cards. A  transcription   Thirty patients were admitted to the pediatric ward, with
            error was identified if there were any modifications or   females constituting 15 (50%). The mean age in the pediatric
            omissions of the medication orders during these two   ward was 1.39 ± 2.39 years, and the patients had a median of
            transcription stages. MTEs were categorized according   five medication orders (range: 1 – 16) during admission. In
            to  where  they  occurred:  Medication  administration   the general ward, 25 of the patients were female (55.6% of 45),
            sheet only, dispensing card only, or both medication   with a mean age of 52.3 ± 16.33 years, and they had a median
            administration sheet and dispensing card. The MTEs   of six medication orders (range: 1 – 25) during admission.
            were further categorized into the following types: wrong   3.2. MTEs rate
            dose, missing dosage form, missing frequency, omission
            of stop medication order, omission of new medication   Overall, 20 (26.7%) patients had at least one MTE. Seven
            order, wrong frequency, and wrong name. All medications   (23.3%) of the patients admitted to the pediatric ward
            involved  in  a  transcription  error  were  classified  using   had at least one error, while 13 (28.9%) from the general
            the World Health Organization Anatomic Therapeutic   ward experienced at least one MTE (Figure 2). A total of
            Chemical (WHO ATC) classification methodology.     38 MTEs were recorded, with the majority (18 [47.4%])
                                                               occurring at both transcription stages (the medication
              In the second stage of this study, a questionnaire   administration sheet and the individual dispensing card).
            was administered to assess nurse’s perceptions of the   In addition, 11 (28.9%) occurred only on the medication
            causes of MTEs. The first section of the survey captured   administration sheet, and 9 (23.7%) occurred only on the
            demographic  information  such  as age,  gender,  work   individual dispensing card (Figure 3).
            experience, marital status, and the ward where the nurse
            worked. The second section consisted of seven questions   3.3. Types of errors and drug classification
            that captured information on participant’s opinions about   The most frequent MTEs were the omission of new
            the causes of MTEs. Nurses were asked to express their   medication orders (11 [28.9%]), followed by the omission of
            perceptions in the second section using a 4-point Likert   stop medication orders (10 [26.3%]). There were 7 (18.4%)
            scale (1: Strongly disagree; 2: Disagree; 3: Agree; 4: Strongly   wrong dose MTEs, 3 (7.9%) MTEs each for missing dosage
            agree). The questionnaire was pretested among five nurses   form and wrong frequency (Table 2).
            from the maternity ward and refined to ensure relevance
            and appropriateness.                               The medications involved in transcription errors and their
                                                               rates according to WHO ATC classification are described
              All data were collected by Yong Marie Noel Sangha   in Table 3. Antibacterials for systemic use had the highest
               rd
            (a  3 -year  pharmacy  technician  student)  and  verified   number of MTEs (21 [55.3%]), followed by drugs used for
            daily for completeness and accuracy by Suh Nsutebu Ntani   diabetes and analgesics, each with three MTEs.
            (the project supervisor, who is a clinical pharmacist).
                                                               3.4. Survey of nurses’ opinions about the causes of MTEs
            2.4. Data analysis
                                                               Fifty-four (94.7%) nurses completed the survey
            Data  were  entered  into  a  Microsoft  Excel  spreadsheet,   questionnaire. Of these, 79.6% were female and 57.4%
            cleaned, and transferred to Statistics for the Social Sciences
            version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Continuous variables were   Table 1. Demographic characteristics of patients
            summarized as mean (standard deviation) or median   Variable               Pediatric   General   Total
            (range),  and categorical  variables  were expressed  as                    ward     ward
            frequencies (percentage). The demographic information   Sex (n [%])
            of participants in each ward was summarized. In addition,   Female        15 (50.0)  25 (55.6)  40 (53.3)
            the prevalence of MTEs in each ward and the proportion
            of MTEs by location where they occurred (administration   Male            15 (50.0)  20 (44.4)  35 (46.7)
            sheet, dispensing card, and both) were determined. The   Age (mean±SD year)  1.39±2.39) 52.3±16.33
            proportion of each type of MTEs in the total sample was   Mean number of medication   5 (1 – 16)  6 (1 – 25)
            also summarized.                                   orders (median [range])


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         3                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2457
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123