Page 218 - GHES-3-1
P. 218

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                  Fatigue, quality of life, and social support in Greek health staff


              The statistical analysis initially included a descriptive   Regarding the workplace, 64 (40.3%) participants were
            analysis of the demographic characteristics of the sample,   in the public sector and 95  (59.7%) were in the private
            specifically the descriptive analysis of the aforementioned   sector (Table 4).
            variables. This comprised a frequency analysis of    A total of 105 (66%) individuals did not have a position
            categorical variables and an average analysis of quantitative   of responsibility in their work, whereas 54 (34%) had the
            variables. Next, the descriptive analysis involved scoring   same (Table 5).
            the questionnaires, which included both the overall data
            and the data separated by public and private sectors. Then,   Regarding years of service in the artificial kidney
            the  normality  of  the  questionnaire  scores  was  checked   unit, 16 (10.1%) participants did not respond, 75 (47.2%)
            using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for both the overall   participants answered 0 – 5 years, 15 (9.4%) answered 6
            data and the data for the public and private sectors. The   – 10 years, 10 (6.3%) individuals answered 11 – 15 years,
            one-sample  t-test  was  used  to  calculate  the  confidence   17  (10.7%) answered 16 – 20  years, and 26  (16.4%)
            intervals of the questionnaire scores for the data from the   individuals answered >20 years (Table 6).
            two sectors as well as for the overall data. The Pearson   The mean MSPSS score for the entire sample was 5.66
            linear correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the   (standard deviation [SD] = 1.35), with a range of 1 – 7. The
            intensity and significance of the correlation between the   mean score of the friends subscale for the entire sample
            variables of interest, namely, the questionnaire scores, for   was 5.28 (SD = 1.47), with a minimum of 1 and a maximum
            both the overall data and the data from the public and   of 7. The mean score of the family subscale for the entire
            private sectors.                                   sample was 5.53 (SD = 1.42), with a minimum of 1 and a
            3. Results                                         maximum of 7. The mean score of social support for the
                                                               entire sample was 5.49 (SD = 1.29), with a minimum of
            The study sample consisted of 159 individuals, comprising   1 and a maximum of 7. The mean MSPSS score for the
            138  (86.8%) women and 21  (13.2%) men (Table  1).   public sector was 5.45 (SD = 1.51) and 5.8 (SD  =  1.23) for
            Regarding  their  age  group,  6  (3.8%)  participants  were   the private sector. The mean score of the family subscale
            aged up to 25 years, 47 (29.6%) were aged 26 – 35 years,   for the public sector was 5.32 (SD = 1.67) and 5.67
            50  (31.4%) were aged 36 – 45  years, 12  (7.5%) were   (SD  =  1.22) for the private sector. The mean score of the
            aged  46 – 55 years, and 12 (7.5%) participants were aged   friends subscale for the public sector was 5.07 (SD =  1.55)
            >55 years (Table 1).                               and 5.67 (SD = 1.22) for the private sector. The mean score
              Regarding their educational level, 13  (8.2%)    of social support for the public sector was 5.25 (SD = 1.42)
            participants were high school graduates, 32 (20.1%) were   and 5.62 (SD = 1.18) for the private sector. The mean score
            graduates of private schools (e.g., colleges), 69 (43.4%) had   of the fatigue questionnaire for the entire sample was 2.51
            some university degrees, and 45 (28.3%) had a master’s or   (SD = 0.53), with a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 4.2
            doctoral degree (Table 1).                         (Table 7).
              Regarding their marital status, 42 (26.4%) participants   The mean score of the fatigue questionnaire was 2.63
            were single, 17 (10.5%) were in a relationship, 86 (54.1%)   (SD = 0.57) for the public sector and 2.42 (SD = 0.49) for
            were married or had a cohabitation agreement, 12 (7.5%)   the private sector (Table 8).
            were divorced, and 2 (1.3%) were widowed (Table 1).  The average score of the physical symptoms factor
              Concerning their number of children, 70  (44%) had   of the GHQ-28 questionnaire for the entire sample was
            no children, 25  (15.7%) had one child, 52  (32.7%) had   1.09 (SD = 0.63), with a minimum of 0 and a maximum
            two children, 11 (6.9%) had three children, and 1 (.6%)   of 2.57. The average score of the anxiety/insomnia factor
            participant did not respond (Table 1).             of the GHQ-28 questionnaire for the entire sample was
                                                               1.01 (SD = 0.69), with a minimum of 0 and a maximum
              Regarding the years of service, 57 (35.8%) individuals   of 3. The mean score of the social dysfunction factor of
            did  not  answer,  31  (19.5%)  individuals  answered 0  –   the GHQ-28 questionnaire for the entire sample was 0.99
            5 years, 24 (15.1%) individuals mentioned 16 – 20 years,   (SD = 0.43), with a minimum of.14 and a maximum of
            and 47  (29.6%) individuals had >20  years of service   2.57. The mean score of the severe depression factor of
            (Table 2).                                         the GHQ-28 questionnaire for the entire sample was 0.35

              Regarding the job position, 2 (1.3%) individuals were   (SD = 0.50), with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 2.71.
            medical specialists,  14  (8.8%) were  medical specialists,   The mean score of the GHQ-28 questionnaire for the entire
            116  (73%) were nurses, and 27  (17%) were nursing   sample was 0.86 (SD = 0.47), with a minimum of 0.07 and
            assistants (Table 3).                              a maximum of 2.57.


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        210                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.4574
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223