Page 227 - GHES-3-1
P. 227

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                  Fatigue, quality of life, and social support in Greek health staff


            quality of life; in both cases, the mean values of these scales   and irregular hours. A protective factor may be the social
            were greater among those working in public hospitals. To   support  network  that  health  professionals have.  The
            the best of our knowledge, this study is the first, particularly   social bonds and caring relationships that develop among
            in Greece, to explore the issues of fatigue, social support,   individuals  contribute  positively  to  well-being.  Previous
            and quality of life among health professionals working in   studies on healthcare professionals have demonstrated
            kidney units and to compare the results between the public   a  significant  link  between  quality  of  life  and  the  fatigue
            and private sectors. Health professionals in the public   they experience, suggesting that improving quality of life
            sector experienced more fatigue than those in the private   can alleviate fatigue. In this study, participants reported
            sector. This finding may be associated with the greater   relatively high levels of social support, whereas negative
            social support available in the private sector, as indicated   factors affecting quality of life received overall low scores.
            by lower levels of physical symptoms, anxiety, social   However, the public sector faces greater challenges
            dysfunction, and depression. A  possible explanation for   than the private sector regarding both fatigue levels and
            the variation found in this study is the extremely difficult   quality of life, and health professionals in the public sector
            conditions faced by health professionals in public hospitals.   receive less support than their counterparts in the private
            The heavy workload due to the large number of patients   sector. As anticipated, social support influences perceived
            was a significant factor. Moreover, staff shortages in the   fatigue and quality of life, with these effects being
            public sector further burden working conditions, an issue   more pronounced in the public sector. Conversely, this
            that is likely absent in the private sector.       relationship may not hold true in the private sector, based
              This study has some limitations. Initially, the sample   on regression analyses from previous studies. A  major
            included in the survey was not representative of artificial   aspect of the study’s findings is the differentiation between
            kidney units in general. For instance, 86.8% were women,   the public and private sectors concerning all three factors
            indicating that this element concerns only the present   examined. Working conditions are poorer in the public
            study.  Another  important  limitation  was  the  time.  The   sector compared to the private sector, leading to higher
            period during which the data were collected was relatively   fatigue and lower quality of life. These findings should be
            short due to the need to obtain approvals from the   considered by authorities  responsible  for  designing  and
            hospitals to distribute the paper questionnaire, which   planning the operations of units in public hospitals.
            did not allow the time required to distribute and collect
            the  questionnaires  from  some  units.  A  third  limitation   Acknowledgments
            was that some units did not even respond to the request   None.
            made to distribute the questionnaires, which implies that
            the sample size could be much larger if this limitation   Funding
            did not exist. Further qualitative research should be   None.
            conducted through interviews or focus groups to explore
            the experiences of nurses and doctors working in artificial   Conflict of interest
            kidney units. Moreover, further studies are required
            to investigate the potential confounding factors that   Paraskevi Theofilou is an Editorial Board Member
            differentiate working conditions in the public and private   and Guest Editor of this journal, but was not in any
            sectors and play a role in perceived fatigue and quality   way  involved  in  the  editorial  and  peer-review  process
            of life. Finally, a comparative study could be performed   conducted for this paper, directly or indirectly. Separately,
            between different countries, for example, between Greece   other authors declared that they have no known competing
            and Cyprus.                                        financial interests or personal relationships that could have
                                                               influenced the work reported in this paper.
            5. Conclusion
                                                               Author contributions
            Fatigue is an extremely common issue among health
            professionals and results from various aspects related to   Conceptualization: Gesthimani Chatzimanolaki, Paraskevi
            the nature of the profession. The effects of fatigue can be   Theofilou
            numerous and significant, impacting various facets of daily   Formal  analysis: Gesthimani Chatzimanolaki, Paraskevi
            life, including professional, social, and personal aspects.   Theofilou
            The quality of life of health professionals often reflects a   Investigation: Gesthimani Chatzimanolaki, Paraskevi
            similar trend, with many experiencing a lower quality   Theofilou
            of life due to factors affecting the balance between work   Methodology:  Gesthimani Chatzimanolaki, Paraskevi
            and personal life, such as stressful work environments   Theofilou


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        219                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.4574
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232