Page 42 - GPD-3-4
P. 42

Gene & Protein in Disease                                                      Buccal mucosa and aging



            Conflict of interest                               9.   Handajani J, Tabtila U, Auliawati NR, Rohman A.
                                                                  Characterization of buccal cell DNA after exposure to azo
            The authors declare they have no competing interests.  compounds: A cross-sectional study. F1000Res. 2020;9:1053.
            Authors contributions                                 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25798.2

            Conceptualization: All authors                     10.  Celik A, Cavas T, Ergene-Gozukara S. Cytogenetic
            Writing-original draft: All authors                   biomonitoring in petrol station attendants: Micronucleus test
                                                                  in exfoliated buccal cells. Mutagenesis. 2003;18(5):417-421.
            Writing-review & editing: All authors
                                                                  doi: 10.1093/mutage/geg022
            Ethics approval and consent to participate         11.  Surralles J, Autio K, Nylund L, et al. Molecular cytogenetic
            Not applicable.                                       analysis of buccal cells and lymphocytes from benzene-
                                                                  exposed workers. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18(4):817-823.
            Consent for publication                               doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.4.817
            Not applicable.                                    12.  Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-Volders M,  et al. The
                                                                  micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool
            Availability of data                                  for  biomonitoring  DNA  damage:  The  HUMN  project
            Not applicable.                                       perspective on current status and knowledge gaps.  Mutat
                                                                  Res. 2008;659(1):93-108.
            References                                            doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2008.03.007
            1.   Rodríguez-Rodero S, Fernández-Morera JL, Menéndez-  13.  Papagerakis S, Pannone G, Zheng L, et al. Oral epithelial
               Torre E, Calvanese V, Fernández AF, Fraga MF. Aging   stem cells - Implications in normal development and cancer
               genetics and aging. Aging Dis. 2011;2(3):186-195.  metastasis. Exp Cell Res. 2014;325(2):111-129.
            2.   Tulchinsky TH, Varavikova EA. Environmental and      doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.04.021
               occupational health. In: The New Public Health. Amsterdam:
               Elsevier; 2014. p. 471.                         14.  Eshkoora SA, Ismail P, Rahman SA, Moin S, Adon MY.
                                                                  The association of DNA damage level with early age at
            3.   Chen R, Wang Y, Zhang S,  et al. Biomarkers of ageing:   the occupational exposure in the mechanical workshops
               Current state‐of‐art, challenges, and opportunities.   workers. Asian J Biotechnol. 2012;4(2):83-91.
               MedComm Futur Med. 2023;2:e50.
                                                                  doi: 10.3923/ajbkr.2012.83.91
               doi: 10.1002/mef2.50
                                                               15.  Motgi AA, Chavan MS, Diwan NN, Chowdhery A,
            4.   Cherrie JW, Semple S, Christopher Y, Saleem A,   Channe PP, Shete MV. Assessment of cytogenic damage in
               Hughson   GW, Philips A. How important is inadvertent   the form of micronuclei in oral epithelial cells in patients
               ingestion of hazardous substances at work? Ann Occup Hyg.   using smokeless and smoked form of tobacco and non-
               2006;50(7):693-704.                                tobacco users and its relevance for oral cancer. J Cancer Res
               doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel035                         Ther. 2014;10(1):165-170.
            5.   Groeger S, Meyle J. Oral mucosal epithelial cells.  Front      doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.131454
               Immunol. 2019;10:208.                           16.  Pradeep M, Guruprasad Y, Jose M, Saxena K, Deepa  K,
               doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00208                      Prabhu  V.  Comparative  Study  of  genotoxicity  in  different
                                                                  tobacco  related habits  using  micronucleus assay  in
            6.   Farah R, Haraty H, Salame Z, Fares Y, Ojcius DM, Sadier   exfoliated buccal epithelial  cells.  J  Clin Diagn Res.
               NS. Salivary biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of   2014;8(5):ZC21-ZC24.
               neurological diseases. Biomed J. 2018;41(2):63-87.
                                                                  doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8733.4357
               doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2018.03.004
                                                               17.  Spivack SD, Hurteau GJ, Jain R,  et al. Gene-environment
            7.   Langie SA, Moisse M, Declerck K,  et al. Salivary DNA   interaction signatures by quantitative mRNA profiling
               methylation profiling: Aspects to consider for biomarker   in exfoliated buccal mucosal cells.  Cancer Res.
               identification. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;121:93-101.  2004;64(18):6805-6813.
               doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12721                            doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1771
            8.   Li H, Reeves RK. Functional perturbation of classical natural   18.  Chen C, Arjomandi M, Qin H, Balmes J, Tager I, Holland  N.
               killer and innate lymphoid cells in the oral mucosa during   Cytogenetic  damage  in buccal epithelia and  peripheral
               SIV infection. Front Immunol. 2013;3:417.
                                                                  lymphocytes of young healthy individuals exposed to ozone.
               doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00417                      Mutagenesis. 2006;21(2):131-137.


            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         8                               doi: 10.36922/gpd.4418
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47