Page 43 - GPD-3-4

Gene & Protein in Disease Buccal mucosa and aging

doi: 10.1093/mutage/gel007 29. Michalczyk A, Varigos G, Smith L, Ackland ML. Fresh and
cultured buccal cells as a source of mRNA and protein for
19. Manikantan P, Balachandar V, Sasikala K, Mohanadevi S. molecular analysis. Biotechniques. 2004;37(2):262-269.
DNA damage in viscose factory workers occupationally
exposed to carbon di-sulfide using buccal cell comet assay. doi: 10.2144/04372RR03
Braz J Oral Sci. 2009;8(4):197-200.
30. Martino-Roth MG, Viegas J, Amaral M, Oliveira L,
doi: 10.20396/bjos.v8i4.8642078 Ferreira FLS, Erdtmann B. Evaluation of genotoxicity
through micronuclei test in workers of car and battery repair
20. Rajkokila K, Shajithanoop S, Usharani MV. Nuclear garages. Genet Mol Biol. 2002;25(4):495-500.
anomalies in exfoliated buccal epithelial cells of petrol
station attendants in Tamilnadu, South India. J Med Genet doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572002000400021
Genomics. 2010;2(2):18-22. 31. Herber RFM, Duffus JH, Christensen JM, Olsen E, Park MV.
21. Lorenzoni DC, Pinheiro LP, Nascimento HS, et al. Could Risk assessment for occupational exposure to chemicals.
formaldehyde induce mutagenic and cytotoxic effects in A review of current methodology (IUPAC technical report).
buccal epithelial cells during anatomy classes? Med Oral Pure Appl Chem. 2001;73(6):993-1031.
Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2017;22(1):e58. doi: 10.1351/pac200173060993
doi: 10.4317/medoral.21492 32. Fairhurst S. Hazard and risk assessment of industrial
22. Salama SA, Serrana M, Au WW. Biomonitoring using chemicals in the occupational context in Europe: Some
accessible human cells for exposure and health risk current issues. Food Chem Toxicol. 2003;41(11):1453-1462.
assessment. Mutat Res. 1999;436(1):99-112. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(03)00193-5
doi: 10.1016/s1383-5742(98)00021-0 33. Hassim MH, Hurme M. Occupational chemical exposure
23. Eshkoor SA, Ismail P, Rahman SA, Moin S, Adon MY. and risk estimation in process development and design.
Occupational exposure as a risk factor to enhance the risk of Process Saf Environ Prot. 2010;88(4):225-235.
early ageing. Asian J Biotechnol. 2011;3(6):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2010.03.011
doi: 10.3923/ajbkr.2011.573.580 34. Dinman BD, Dinman JD. The mode of absorption,
24. Heuser VD, Erdtmann B, Kvitko K, Rohr P, da Silva J. distribution, and elimination of toxic materials. In: Harris
Evaluation of genetic damage in Brazilian footwear- RL, editor. Patty’s Industrial Hygiene. New York: John Wiley
workers: Biomarkers of exposure, effect, and susceptibility. & Son Inc.; 2000.
Toxicology. 2007;232(3):235-247. doi: 10.1002/0471435139.hyg003
doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.01.011 35. Borm PJA, Robbins D, Haubold S, et al. The potential
25. Borthakur G, Butryee C, Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis M, Bowen risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC.
PE. Exfoliated buccal mucosa cells as a source of DNA to Part Fibre Toxicol. 2006;3:11.
study oxidative stress. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-3-11
2008;17(1):212-219.
36. Nielsen GD, Ovrebo S. Background, approaches and recent
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0706 trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits:
26. Hearn R, Arblaster K. DNA extraction techniques for use in A minireview. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;51(3):253-269.
education. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2010;38(3):161-166. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.04.002
doi: 10.1002/bmb.20351 37. Artik S, Haarhuis K, Wu X, Begerow J, Gleichmann E.
27. Toy E, Yuksel S, Ozturk F, Karatas OH, Yalcin M. Evaluation Tolerance to nickel: Oral nickel administration induces a
of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in the buccal epithelial high frequency of anergic T cells with persistent suppressor
cells of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with activity. J Immunol. 2001;167(12):6794-6803.
three light-cured bonding composites by using micronucleus doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.6794
testing. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(3):128-135.
38. Rustemeyer T, de Groot J, von Blomberg BME, Frosch PJ,
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.128 Scheper RJ. Induction of tolerance and cross-tolerance to
methacrylate contact sensitizers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol.
28. Franzke B, Schober-Halper B, Hofmann M, et al.
Chromosomal stability in buccal cells was linked to age but 2001;176(3):195-202.
not affected by exercise and nutrients-Vienna Active Ageing doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9266.
Study (VAAS), a randomized controlled trial. Redox Biol. 39. Moller P, Knudsen LE, Loft S, Wallin H. The Comet assay
2020;28:101362.
as a rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to
doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101362 DNA-damaging agents and effect of confounding factors.

Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024) 9 doi: 10.36922/gpd.4418