Page 74 - GTM-4-1
P. 74

Global Translational Medicine                                                       Low-dose radiation



               doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150169                          current perspectives. J Nucl Med Technol. 2015;43(4):242-246.
            67.  Azizova TV, Grigorieva ES, Hunter N, Pikulina MV,      doi: 10.2967/jnmt.115.166074
               Moseeva MB. Risk of mortality from circulatory diseases   77.  Calabrese EJ. Linear non-threshold (LNT) fails numerous
               in Mayak workers cohort following occupational radiation   toxicological stress tests: Implications for continued policy
               exposure. J Radiol Prot. 2015;35(3):517-538.
                                                                  use. Chem Biol Interact. 2022;365:110064.
               doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/517
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110064
            68.  Moseeva MB, Azizova TV, Grigoryeva ES, Haylock R.   78.  Doss M. Linear no-threshold model vs. radiation hormesis.
               Risks of circulatory diseases among Mayak PA workers   Dose Response. 2013;11:480-497.
               with radiation doses estimated using the improved Mayak
               Worker Dosimetry System 2008.  Radiat Environ Biophys.      doi: 10.2203/dose-response.13-005.Doss
               2014;53:469-477.                                79.  Scott BR. It’s time for a new low-dose-radiation risk
               doi: 10.1007/s00411-014-0517-x                     assessment paradigm-one that acknowledges hormesis.
                                                                  Dose Response. 2008;6:333-351.
            69.  Azizova TV, Muirhead CR, Moseeva MB, et al.
               Cerebrovascular diseases in nuclear workers first employed      doi: 10.2203/dose-response.07-005.Scott
               at the Mayak PA in 1948-1972.  Radiat Environ Biophys.   80.  Shibamoto Y, Nakamura H. Overview of biological,
               2011;50(4):539-552.                                epidemiological, and clinical evidence of radiation hormesis.
               doi: 10.1007/s00411-011-0377-6                     Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:2387.
            70.  Ruehm W, Breckow J, Dietze G,  et al. Dose limits for      doi: 10.3390/ijms19082387
               occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic   81.  Little MP, Tawn EJ, Tzoulaki I, et al. Review and metaanalysis
               carcinogens: A German perspective. Radiat Environ Biophys.   of epidemiological associations between low/moderate
               2020;59(1):9-27.                                   doses of ionising radiation and circulatory disease risks,
               doi: 10.1007/s00411-019-00817-x                    and their possible  mechanisms.  Radiat Environ Biophys.
                                                                  2010;49:139-53.
            71.  UNSCEAR 2006 Report. Efects of Ionizing Radiation. Annex
               B. Epidemiological Evaluation of Cardiovascular Disease and      doi: 10.1007/s00411-009-0250-z
               other Non-Cancer Diseases Following Radiation Exposure.   82.  Jorgensen TJ. Dental x-rays and risk of meningioma. Cancer.
               United Nations; 2006.                              2013;119(2):463.
            72.  Authors on behalf of ICRP, Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, et al.      doi: 10.1002/cncr.27710
               ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions
               and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and   83.  Kaludercic N, Deshwal S, Di Lisa F. Reactive oxygen species
               organs - threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation   and redox compartmentalization. Front Physiol. 2014;5:285.
               protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41(1-2):1-322.     doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00285
               doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001                 84.  Karam  PA,  Leslie  SA.  Calculations  of  background  beta-
            73.  Boerma M, Sridharan V, Mao XW,  et al. Effects of   gamma radiation dose through geologic time. Health Phys.
               ionizing radiation on the heart. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res.   1999;77(6):662-667.
               2016;770(Pt B):319-327.                            doi: 10.1097/00004032-199912000-00010
               doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.07.003                85.  Mitchel RE. The dose window for radiation-induced
                                                                  protective adaptive responses. Dose Response. 2009;8:192-208.
            74.  Puukila S, Lemon JA, Lees SJ, Tai TC, Boreham DR,
               Khaper N. Impact of ionizing radiation on the cardiovascular      doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-039.Mitchel.
               system: A review. Radiat Res. 2017;188(4.2):539-546.
                                                               86.  Higley KA, Kocher DC, Real AG, Chambers DB. Relative
               doi: 10.1667/RR14864.1                             biological effectiveness and radiation weighting factors in the
                                                                  context of animals and plants. Ann ICRP. 2012;41:233-245.
            75.  Schultz-Hector S. Radiation-induced heart disease: Review
               of experimental data on dose response and pathogenesis. Int      doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.014
               J Radiat Biol. 1992;61:149-160.
                                                               87.  Duffy DM. Fusion power: A challenge for materials science.
               doi: 10.1080/09553009214550761                     Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2010;368(1923):3315-28.
            76.  Baldwin J, Grantham V. Radiation hormesis: Historical and      doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0060







            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         66                              doi: 10.36922/gtm.7229
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79