Page 105 - IJB-2-1
P. 105

Richard Bibb, Nadine Nottrodt and Arnold Gillner


                                                                5.   Hoch E, Hirth T, Tovar G, et al., 2013, Chemical tailor-
            10. Summary of Conference Presentations                 ing of gelatin to adjust its chemical and physical proper-
            The project outcomes have been presented in 28 pres-    ties for functional bioprinting.  Journal  of Materials
            entations including Tissue Engineering and Rege-        Chemistry B, vol.1: 5675–5685.
            nerative Medicine International Society — EU  Meet-     http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3TB20745E
            ing, Genova, Italy,    2014 (3  presentations); EuroBi-  6.   Seiler N,  Bremus-Köbberling E, Leonhäuser  D,  et al.,
            oMat 2015 (4 presentations)    and 2013 (2 presenta-    2012, Gradients for cell guidance  —  functionalization
            tions);    26th European Conference on Biomaterials,  Liv-  by UV-laser-irradiation.  Journal  of Tissue Engineering
            erpool, UK, 2014 (3 presentations);      Euronanoforum,   and Regenerative Medicine, vol.6: 373–374.
            Dublin,  Ireland, 2013 (3   presentations);    DGBM con-  http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.1586
            ference, Erlangen, Germany, 2013 (2 presentations)   7.   Kessler L, Huber B, Hoch E, et al., 2014, Cross-linked
                                                                    hydrogels as a potential tool for soft tissue engineering.
            Conflict of Interest and Funding                        Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medi-
                                                                    cine, vol.8: 353.
            No conflict of interest was reported by all authors. The   http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.1932
                                                     th
            project was funded by the European Union 7    Fra-  8.   Gugerell A, Kober J, Laube T, et al., 2014, Electrospun
            mework Programme (FP7-NMP-2010-Large-4, GA no:          poly(ester-urethane) and poly(ester-urethane-urea) flee-
            236416). Update ArtiVasc3D-Generation of a 3D vas-      ces as promising tissue engineering scaffolds for adi-
            cularized skin substitute; Keck M, Gugerell A, Ko-      pose-derived stem cells. PLOS ONE, vol.9(3): e90676.
            ber   J,   Engelhart S, Gillner  A, Nottrodt N; GA no:   http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090676
            263416; revised (2014),  http://www.artivasc.eu     9.   Gugerell A, Neumann A, Kober J, et al., 2014, Adipose
                                                                    derived  stem cells cultivated  on electrospun  L-lactide/
            Acknowledgements                                        glycolide copolymer fleeces and gelatine hydrogels under

                                                                    flow  conditions  —  aiming  physiological reality  in hy-
            This extremely ambitious challenge  could only be       podermis tissue engineering. Burns, vol.41(1): 163–171.
            achieved in an interdisciplinary network. All over Eu-  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.06.010
            rope, twenty  partners from the fields of biomaterial   10.  Tammaro L, Vittoria V, Wyrwa R, et al., 2014, Fabrica-
            development, tissue engineering, freeform  methods,     tion  and characterization  of electrospun  polylac-
            automation and simulation have joined forces  under     tide/β-tricalcium phosphate hybrid meshes for potential
            the leadership of Fraunhofer ILT.                       applications in  hard  tissue repair.  BioNanoMaterials,

            References                                              vol.15: 9–20.
                                                                    http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bnm-2014-0001
              1.   ArtiVasc 3D, n.d., viewed August 30, 2015,     11.  Han X, Bibb R and Harris R, 2015, A junction rounding
                 <http://www.artivasc.eu/>                          method  for the efficient design of bifurcation  vascular
              2.   Engelhardt S, Wehner M and Refle O, 2012, Method for   vessels in skin tissue engineering for additive manufac-
                 the fabrication of macroscopic high resolution scaffolds   turing.  Journal of  Visual Languages  and Computing,
                 by the combination of inkjet printing and laser initiated   vol.28: 238–249.
                 polymerization. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Re-  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.12.005
                 generative Medicine, vol.6: 299–300.           12.  Han X, Bibb R and Harris R, 2015, Artificial Vascular
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.1586                Bifurcations  — Design and  Modelling, Procedia CIRP,
              3.   Hoch J, Tovar G and Borchers K, 2014, Photopolyme-  in press.
                 rizable and non-gelling gelatin for the preparation  of   13.  Engelhardt S,  Tempeler J and Wehner  M, 2015, The
                 tissue substitutes by additive manufacturing techniques.   voxel onset time as an in situ method to evaluate focal
                 Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medi-  position effects on two-photon-induced lithography. Ap-
                 cine, vol.8: 446.                                  plied Physics A, vol.121(2): 513–519.
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.1932                http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00339-015-9449-9
              4.   Hoch E, Tovar G and Borchers K, 2014, Bioprinting of   14.  Huber B, Klechowitz N, Borchers K, et al., 2012, Isola-
                 artificial blood vessels — current approaches towards a   tion and culture of primary human subcutaneous adipo-
                 demanding goal.  European Journal of  Cardiothoracic   cytes and construction of a fatty tissue equivalent. Bio-
                 Surgery, vol.46(5): 767–778.                       NanoMaterials, vol.13(1–4): 195.
                 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu242             http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bnm-2012-0015
                                        International Journal of Bioprinting (2016)–Volume 2, Issue 1      101
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108