Page 146 - IJB-4-2
P. 146

Garcia-Garcia L A, et al.

           ‘Cartilage Regeneration’ (30 occurrences). In APY   organs. ‘Skeletal Muscle’ and ‘Bone Construct’
           2016, the number of keywords was scarce and keywords   predominated for the APY 2011, in the following APY
           related to techniques were not present; the most frequent   (2012) ‘Graft’ leaded and ‘Heart’ and ‘Lung’ were
           keywords for cell sources and tissue/organs were res-  present too. Moreover, ‘Organ’ leaded for the APY 2013,
           pectively ‘Adipose Derived Stem Cells’ (ADSC) (21   ‘Liver’ for the APY 2014, ‘Neural Tissue Engineering’
           occurrences) and ‘Organoids’ (29 occurrences).      for the APY 2015, and ‘Organoids’ for the APY 2016. In
                                                               particular, an increased number of studies of organoids
           4. conclusions                                      are expected because these are small self-organized 3D
           This study tracked knowledge production in bioprinting   structures derived from stem cells that can reproduce the
                                                                                  [32]
           from 2000 to 2017 through scientometric analyses of the   functionality of organs .
           most complete scientific databases, namely, Scopus and   The results of this study present insights into the main
           Web of Science, as part of a CTI methodology.       trends of scientific published research. These can be
            A keyword network map analysis was applied to      valuable to people involved in R&D activities in the 3D
           visualise the co-occurrence of terminology associated   bioprinting field.
           with 3D bioprinting and to identify the most frequent   Conflict of Interest
           keywords in scientific publications. Additionally, the
           APY was obtained for each keyword to show its usage   No conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
           in recent years. These approaches offered insights into
           the most commonly used materials, biological elements,   References
           applications, and methods in bioprinting.
            From APY 2011 to 2016, the papers analysed showed   1.   Ventola C L, 2014, Medical applications for 3D printing:
           that the most frequently occurring keywords for ma-    Current and projected uses.  P T, 39(10): 704–711.
           terials, biological elements, and applications were    Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
           polylactic acid (PLA) in APY 2014, mesenchymal stem    PMC4189697
           cells (MSC) in APY 2013 and 2014, and bone tissue
           engineering and bone regeneration respectively in APY   2.   Banks J, 2013, Adding value in additive manufacturing.
           2012 and 2014.                                         IEEE  Pulse,  4(6):  22–26.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
            From a general perspective, in APY 2011–2016, the     mpul.2013.2279617
           most frequent keywords were ‘Treatment’ and ‘Bioink’.   3.   Paterson A M, Bibb R, Campbell R I,  et al., 2015,
           The papers analysed reflected research on cancer,      Comparing additive manufacturing technologies for
           regenerative medicine, and MSC analysis for the former   customised wrist splints. Rapid Prototyp J, 21(3): 230–245.
           keyword and application of multicellular spheroid
           deposition and the use of hydrogels like GelMA for the   http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2013-0099
           latter keyword.                                     4.   Tan X, Kok Y, Tan Y J , et al., 2015, Graded microstructure
            In the last three years (2015–2017, i.e., APY 2016),   and mechanical properties of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-
           studies focused on bioinks, organoids, adipose tissue-  4V via electron beam melting. Acta Materialia, 97: 1–16.
           derived stem cells (ADSC), and cell spheroids for      http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.036
           fabricating complex tissues [9,30] . It should be noted that
           spheroids have great potential in bioprinting because a   5.   Kolesky D B, Truby R L, Gladman A S, et al., 2014, 3D
           spherical shape enhances cell aggregation and promotes   bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue
           cell-to-cell contact .                                 constructs. Adv Mater, 26(19): 3124–3130. http://dx.doi.
                          [30]
            Results of the research trends obtained for bioprinting   org/10.1002/adma.201305506
           techniques, cell sources, and tissue/organs (APY    6.   Murphy S V, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and
           2011–2016) exhibited that for techniques inkjet        organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32(8): 773–785. http://dx.doi.
           printing prevailed (APY 2012–2014). Considering the
           cell sources, two trends were identified, the first one   org/10.1038/nbt.2958
           where different types of stem cells are used including   7.   Derby B, 2012, Printing and prototyping of tissue and
           ‘Mesenchymal Stem Cell’ (MSC; APY 2012–2014),          scaffolds.  Science, 16(338):  921–927. http://dx.doi.
           ‘Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells’           org/10.1126/science.1226340
           (BMSC) and ‘Human Bone Marrow Derived               8.   Pati F, Jang J, Ha D H, et al., 2014, Printing three-
           Mesenchymal  Stem  Cell’  (HBMSC). The  second
           trend shows that ‘Human Adipose Stem Cell’ (HASC;      dimensional tissue analogues with decellularized
           APY 2015–2016) is applied. On the other hand, it was   extracellular matrix bioink. Nat Commun, 5: 1–11. http://
           observed an increasing effort to study fully functional   dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4935


                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2018)–Volume 4, Issue 2         7
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150