Page 18 - IJB-6-3
P. 18
Bioethical and legal issues in 3D bioprinting
transplantation. The problem of ethical evaluation References
and legal regulation of 3D bioprinting are that this
technology cannot be thoroughly evaluated using 1. Pereira FD, Parfenov V, Khesuani YD, et al., 2018, Commercial
standard clinical trials or taking into account the 3D Bioprinters. In: 3D Printing and Biofabrication. Springer
current regulatory requirements. International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 535–549.
However, before the 3D bioprinting technology DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-45444-3_12.
spreads and becomes clinically available, several 2. Schwab K, 2017, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Crown
regulations of scientific research and medical Business. Crown Business Group, New York.
practice should be adopted. First of all, there is a 3. Mironov V, 2003, Printing Technology to Produce Living
need to develop informed consents for donation, Tissue. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 3:701–704.
material manipulation, storage, and its further use, 4. Guillemot F, Mironov V, Nakamura M, 2010, Bioprinting
including for commercial and research purposes. is coming of age: Report from the international conference
Moreover, it is necessary to develop requirements on bioprinting and biofabrication in Bordeaux (3B’09).
for safety, quality, and efficiency of technological Biofabrication, 2:010201. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/010201.
procedures and the end products obtained by 3D 5. Zopf DA, Hollister SJ, Nelson ME, et al., 2013, Bioresorbable
bioprinting taking into account the human rights Airway Splint Created with a Three-Dimensional Printer.
and dignity. Furthermore, it is of great importance N Engl J Med, 368:2043–2045. DOI: 10.1056/nejmc1206319.
to establish committees for creation and regulation 6. Grigoryan B, Paulsen SJ, Corbett DC, et al., 2019,
of national guidelines on technical, legal, and Multivascular Networks and Functional Intravascular
ethical issues related to the development and Topologies within Biocompatible Hydrogels. Science,
application of 3D bioprinting technologies. All 364:458–464. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav9750.
patients including minors and incapable people 7. Crowley C, Birchall M, Seifalian AM, 2015, Trachea
need to be legally protected. Last but not least, it Transplantation: From Laboratory to Patient: Trachea
is essential to establish regulations of turnover and Transplantation. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 9:357–367.
limits of commercialization for 3D bioprinting DOI: 10.1002/term.1847.
technologies of human organs and tissues, as 8. Zhong C, Xie HY, Zhou L, et al., 2016, Human Hepatocytes
well as possible sanctions for illegal trafficking of Loaded in 3D Bioprinting Generate Mini-liver. Hepatobiliary
Pancreat Dis Int, 15:512–518. doi.org/10.1016/s1499-
artificial organs.
3872(16)60119-4. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60119-4.
Authors’ contributions 9. Laronda MM, Rutz AL, Xiao S, et al., 2017, A Bioprosthetic
Ovary Created Using 3D Printed Microporous Scaffolds
Conception and design: AK and GS; Collection Restores Ovarian Function in Sterilized Mice. Nat Commun,
and assembly of data: AK, SB, and AA; Data 8:15261. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15261.
analysis and interpretation: SB, AK, and AA; 10. Bulanova EA, Koudan EV, Degosserie J, et al., 2017,
Manuscript writing: SB and AK; Final approval of Bioprinting of a Functional Vascularized Mouse
manuscript: All authors. Thyroid Gland Construct. Biofabrication, 9:034105.
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7fdd.
Acknowledgments 11. Arslan-Yildiz A, Assal RE, Chen P, et al., 2016, Towards
AK was supported by the Grant of the President Artificial Tissue Models: Past, Present, and Future of 3D
of the Russian Federation – for state support of Bioprinting. Biofabrication, 8:014103. DOI: 10.1088/1758-
young Russian scientists – К-3244.2019.7. The 5090/8/1/014103.
authors thank Nelli Mamaiusupova for her critical 12. Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and
reading of the manuscript. Organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32:773–785. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2958.
13. Radenkovic D, Solouk A, Seifalian A, 2016, Personalized
Conflicts of interest Development of Human Organs Using 3D Printing
Technology. Med Hypotheses, 87:30–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.
No conflicts of interest are reported by the authors. mehy.2015.12.017.
14 International Journal of Bioprinting (2020)–Volume 6, Issue 3

