Page 89 - IJB-7-3
P. 89

Pei, et al.
               https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2b6            Measurement  of  Cellular  Infiltration.  Biomacromolecules,
           32.  Kato-Negishi M, Morimoto Y, Onoe H, et al., 2013, Millimeter-  7:2796–2805.
               sized Neural Building Blocks for 3D Heterogeneous Neural      https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060680j
               Network Assembly. Adv Healthc Mater, 2:1564–70.  42.  Chwalek K, Tang-Schomer MD, Omenetto FG, et al., 2015,
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201300052              In Vitro Bioengineered Model of Cortical Brain Tissue. Nat
           33.  Sundararaghavan  HG, Monteiro GA, Firestein  BL, et  al.,   Protoc, 10:1362–73.
               2009, Neurite Growth in 3D Collagen Gels with Gradients of      https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.091
               Mechanical Properties. Biotechnol Bioeng, 102:632–43.  43.  Odawara A, Gotoh M, Suzuki I, 2013, A Three-dimensional
               https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22074                   Neuronal Culture Technique that Controls the Direction of
           34.  NjNbRU,  2008,  Microfluidic  Generation  of  Biomaterial   Neurite Elongation and the Position of Soma to Mimic the
               Gradients for Control of Neurite Outgrowth. Graduate School   Layered Structure of the Brain. RSC Adv, 3:23620.
               New Brunswick Electronic Theses and Dissertations.     https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44757j
           35.  Hopkins  AM, DeSimone E, Chwalek K, et al., 2015, 3D   44.  Lee W, Pinckney J, Lee V, et al., 2009, Three-dimensional
               In Vitro Modeling of the  Central Nervous System.  Prog   Bioprinting  of Rat Embryonic  Neural Cells.  Neuroreport,
               Neurobiol, 125:1–25.                                20:798–803.
           36.  Bai H, Wang D, Delattre B, et al., 2015, Biomimetic Gradient      https://doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0b013e32832b8be4
               Scaffold from Ice-templating for Self-seeding of Cells with   45.  Gu Q,  Tomaskovic-Crook  E,  Lozano  R,  et  al.,  2016,
               Capillary Effect. Acta Biomater, 20:113–119.        Functional 3D Neural Mini-Tissues from Printed Gel-Based
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.007        Bioink and Human Neural Stem Cells. Adv Healthc Mater,
           37.  Rnjak-Kovacina J,  Wise SG, Li Z, et al.,  2011, Tailoring   5:1429–38.
               the Porosity and Pore Size of Electrospun  Synthetic      https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201670060
               Human  Elastin  Scaffolds  for  Dermal  Tissue  Engineering.   46.  Lozano R, Stevens L, Thompson BC, et al., 2015, 3D Printing
               Biomaterials, 32:6729–36.                           of  Layered  Brain-like  Structures  Using  Peptide  Modified
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.065  Gellan Gum Substrates. Biomaterials, 67:264–73.
           38.  Murphy  CM,  Haugh  MG,  O’Brien  FJ,  2010,  The  Effect      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.022
               of Mean Pore Size on Cell  Attachment,  Proliferation  and   47.  Gu ET, Wallace GG, Crook JM, 2017, Engineering Human
               Migration  in  Collagen-glycosaminoglycan  Scaffolds  for   Neural Tissue by 3D Bioprinting. In: Biomaterials for Tissue
               Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials, 31:461–6.    Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology. p129–38.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7741-3_10
           39.  Lu  H, Kawazoe  N, Kitajima  T,  et  al.,  2012,  Spatial   48.  Vijayavenkataraman  S,  Vialli  N, Fuh JY,  et  al.,  2019,
               Immobilization  of  Bone  Morphogenetic  Protein-4  Conductive   Collagen/Polypyrrole-b-polycaprolactone
               in  a  Collagen-PLGA  Hybrid  Scaffold  for  Enhanced   Hydrogel for Bioprinting of Neural Tissue Constructs. Int J
               Osteoinductivity. Biomaterials, 33:6140–6.          Bioprint, 5:229.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.038     https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i2.1.229
           40.  Engelmayr GC Jr., Cheng M, Bettinger  CJ, et al., 2008,   49.  Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al., 2006, Matrix Elasticity
               Accordion-like Honeycombs for  Tissue Engineering of   Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell, 126:677–89.
               Cardiac Anisotropy. Nat Mater, 7:1003–10.           https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2316                50.  Fischer  T, Hayn  A, Mierke CT, 2019, Fast and Reliable
           41.  Pham QP, Shrma U, Mikos AG, 2006, Electrospun Poly(E-  Advanced  Two-step Pore-size Analysis of Biomimetic  3D
               caprolactone)  Microfiber  and  Multilayer  Nanofiber/  Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds. Sci Rep, 9:8352.
               Microfiber  Scaffolds:  Characterization  of  Scaffolds  and      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44764-5












                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2021)–Volume 7, Issue 3        85
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94