Page 293 - IJB-9-1
P. 293

International Journal of Bioprinting                                               3D-Printed scaffolds


            [2017] No.344), Scientific Research Fund Project of   6.   Zhuang P, Sun AX, An J,  et al., 2018, 3D Neural tissue
            Wuhan Institute of Technology (Grant No. K201861),    models: from spheroids to bioprinting.  Biomaterials, 154:
            and South Hubei Talents Project of Innovation and     113–133.
            Entrepreneurship (Grant [2019] No.11).                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.002
            Conflict of interest                               7.   Daly  AC,  Pitacco  P,  Nulty  J,  et al.,  2018,  3D  printed
                                                                  microchannel networks to direct vascularisation during
            All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.  endochondral bone repair. Biomaterials, 162: 34–46.
            Author contributions                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.057
                                                               8.   Liu DH, Nie W, Li DJ, et al., 2019, 3D printed PCL/SrHA
            G-P.Y. designed the experiments. F.L., S-Y.Z., and Z-W.L.   scaffold for enhanced bone regeneration. Chem Eng J, 362:
            manufactured and characterized the samples. H-L.K. and   269–279.
            F.L. carried out the in vitro and in vivo experiments. F.L.
            and G-P.Y. wrote the paper and conducted the analysis   9.   Agudelo RR, Scheuermann K, García AG,  et al., 2018,
            and discussions.  All authors discussed the results and   Hybrid nanofibers based on poly-caprolactone/gelatin/
            commented on  the  manuscript.  S-Y.Z.  and Z-W.L.    hydroxyapatite nanoparticles-loaded doxycycline: effective
                                                                  anti-tumoral and antibacterial activity. Mat Sci Eng C Mater
            contributed equally to this work.
                                                                  Biol Appl, 83: 25–34.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.012

            All animal experiments were performed at the Tongji   10.  Kang HL, Jiang XD, Liu ZW,  et al., 2021, Biodegradable
            Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and        3D printed scaffolds of modified poly (Trimethylene
            Technology in accordance with protocols approved by the   Carbonate) composite materials with poly (L-Lactic Acid)
            Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.          and  hydroxyapatite  for  bone  regeneration.  Nanomaterials
                                                                  (Basel), 11: 3215.
            Consent for publication                               https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123215
            Not applicable.                                    11.  Hu B, Du HJ, Yan GP, et al., 2014, Magnetic polycarbonate
                                                                  microspheres for tumor-targeted delivery of tumor necrosis
            Availability of data                                  factor. Drug Deliv, 21: 204–212.
            The data that support the findings of this study are available      https://doi.org/10.3109/10717544.2013.843609
            from the corresponding author on reasonable request.  12.  Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou ZW,  et al., 2017, 3D printing of
            References                                            polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective.
                                                                  Composites B, 110: 442–458.
            1.   Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al., 2017, Polymers for 3D      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
               printing and customized additive manufacturing.  Chem
               Rev, 117: 10212–10290.                          13.  Han SH, Cha MS, Jin YZ, et al., 2021, BMP-2 and hMSC dual
                                                                  delivery onto 3D printed PLA-biogel scaffold for critical-size
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074        bone defect regeneration in rabbit tibia. Biomed Mater, 16:
            2.   Matai I, Kaur G, Seyedsalehi A, et al., 2020, Progress in   015019.
               3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative      https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aba879
               engineering. Biomaterials, 226: 119536.
                                                               14.  Aihemaiti P, Jiang H, Aiyiti W, et al., 2022, Optimization of
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536
                                                                  3D printing parameters of biodegradable polylactic acid/
            3.   Yan  YF,  Chen  H, Zhang  HB,  et al.,  2019,  Vascularized   hydroxyapatite composite bone plates. Int J Bioprint, 8: 490.
               3D printed scaffolds for promoting bone regeneration.      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.490
               Biomaterials, 190–1: 97–110.
                                                               15.  Lu K, Yan GP, Chen H,  et al., 2009, Microwave-assisted
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.033  ring-opening copolymerization  of e>-caprolactone and
            4.   Liang Q, Ma Y, Yao X, et al., 2022, Advanced 3D-printing   2-phenyl-5,5-bis(oxymethyl) trimethylene carbonate.  Sci
               bioinks for articular cartilage repair. Int J Bioprint, 8: 511.  Bull, 54:  3237–3243.
            5.   Bunpetch V, Zhang XA, Li T,  et al., 2019, Silicate-based   16.  Feng TJ, Mei LL, Liu F, et al., 2021, Microwave-assisted ring-
               bioceramic scaffolds for dual-lineage regeneration of   opening copolymerization and property of polycarbonates.
               osteochondral defect. Biomaterials, 192: 323–333.  Polym Adv Technol, 32: 3412–3420.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.025  17.  Liu H, Wu F, Chen R,  et al., 2022, Electrohydrodynamic


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        285                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.641
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298