Page 69 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting Machine learning and 3D bioprinting

37. Sujeeun LY, Goonoo N, Ramphul H, et al., 2020, Correlating 45. Xu H, Liu Q, Casillas J, et al., 2020, Prediction of cell viability
in vitro performance with physico-chemical characteristics in dynamic optical projection stereolithography-based
of nanofibrous scaffolds for skin tissue engineering using bioprinting using machine learning. J Intel Manuf, 33:1–11.
supervised machine learning algorithms. R Soc Open Sci, 46. Malekpour A, Chen X, 2022, Printability and cell viability
7(12):201293.
in extrusion-based bioprinting from experimental,
38. Paddock SW, 1999, Confocal laser scanning microscopy. computational, and machine learning views. J Funct
Biotechniques, 27(5):992–1004. Biomater, 13(2):40.
https://doi.org/10.2144/99275ov01 47. Tröndle K, Miotto G, Rizzo L, et al., 2022, Deep learning-
assisted nephrotoxicity testing with bioprinted renal
39. Kalantary S, Jahani A, Pourbabaki R, et al., 2019, Application spheroids. Int J Bioprint, 8(2):164–173.
of ANN modeling techniques in the prediction of the
diameter of PCL/gelatin nanofibers in environmental and 48. Al-Kofahi Y, Zaltsman A, Graves R, et al., 2018, A deep
medical studies. RSC Adv, 9(43):24858–24874. learning-based algorithm for 2-D cell segmentation in
microscopy images. BMC Bioinf, 19(1):1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA04927D
49. McQuin C, Goodman A, Chernyshev V, et al., 2018,
40. Kievit FM, Florczyk SJ, Leung MC, et al., 2010, Chitosan– CellProfiler 3.0: Next-generation image processing for
alginate 3D scaffolds as a mimic of the glioma tumor biology. PLoS Biol, 16(7):e2005970.
microenvironment. Biomaterials, 31(22):5903–5910.
50. Shohan S, Harm J, Hasan M, et al., 2021, Non-destructive
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.062 quality monitoring of 3D printed tissue scaffolds via
41. Lee F, Kurisawa M, 2013, Formation and stability of dielectric impedance spectroscopy and supervised machine
interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels consisting learning. Proc Manuf, 53:636–643.
of fibrin and hyaluronic acid for tissue engineering. Acta 51. Chen D, Sarkar S, Candia J, et al., 2016, Machine learning
Biomater, 9(2):5143–5152. based methodology to identify cell shape phenotypes
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.036 associated with microenvironmental cues. Biomaterials,
104:104–118.
42. Fitzgerald KA, Guo J, Tierney EG, et al., 2015, The use
of collagen-based scaffolds to simulate prostate cancer 52. Yao K, Sun J, Huang K, et al., 2021, Analyzing cell-scaffold
bone metastases with potential for evaluating delivery of interaction through unsupervised 3D nuclei segmentation.
nanoparticulate gene therapeutics. Biomaterials, 66:53–66. Int J Bioprint, 8(1):167–181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07.019 53. Yao K, Rochman ND, Sun SX, 2019, Cell type classification
and unsupervised morphological phenotyping from low-
43. Song Y, Hua S, Sayyar S, et al., 2022, Corneal bioprinting resolution images using deep learning. Sci Rep, 9(1):1–13.
using a high concentration pure collagen I transparent
bioink. Bioprinting, 28:e00235. 54. Sun J, Hong GS, Rahman M, et al., 2004, The application
of nonstandard support vector machine in tool condition
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00235 monitoring system, in Proceedings. DELTA 2004. Second
44. Reina-Romo E, Mandal S, Amorim P, et al., 2021, Towards IEEE International Workshop on Electronic Design, Test and
the experimentally-informed in silico nozzle design Applications, 295–300.
optimization for extrusion-based bioprinting of shear-
thinning hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 9:701778.

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 61 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.717