Page 81 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting of ultrashort peptides for chondrogenesis

7. Richardson SM, Kalamegam G, Pushparaj PN, et al., 2016, via SOX9, TGFB1 or BMP2 gene transfer. PLoS One,
Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: Focus 15(8):e0237479.
on articular cartilage and intervertebral disc regeneration. 24. Ibrahim MI, Alsafadi D, Alamry KA, et al., 2021, Properties and
Methods, 99:69–80.
applications of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)
8. Somoza RA, Welter JF, Correa D, et al., 2014, Chondrogenic biocomposites. J Polym Environ, 29:1010–1030.
differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: Challenges and 25. Montalbano G, Borciani G, Pontremoli C, et al., 2019,
unfulfilled expectations. Tissue Eng Part B: Rev, 20(6):596–608.
Development and biocompatibility of collagen-based
9. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen Y-F, 2019, Print me an organ! Why composites enriched with nanoparticles of strontium
we are not there yet. Progr Polym Sci, 97:101145. containing mesoporous glass. Materials, 12(22):3719.
10. Huang J, Xiong J, Wang D, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of 26. Khan Z, Kahin K, Rauf S, et al., 2019, Optimization of a 3D
hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering. Gels, 7(3):144. bioprinting process using ultrashort peptide bioinks. Int J
Bioprint, 5(1):173.
11. Han X, Chang S, Zhang M, 2021, Advances of hydrogel-
based bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering. Front 27. Di Bella C, Fosang A, Donati DM, et al., 2015, 3D bioprinting
Bioeng Biotechnol, (9):816–829. of cartilage for orthopedic surgeons: Reading between the
lines. Front Surg, 2:39.
12. Huang J, Huang Z, Liang Y, et al., 2021, 3D printed gelatin/
hydroxyapatite scaffolds for stem cell chondrogenic 28. Wei W, Ma Y, Yao X, et al., 2021, Advanced hydrogels for the
differentiation and articular cartilage repair. Biomater Sci, repair of cartilage defects and regeneration. Bioact Mater,
9(7):2620–2630. 6(4):998–1011.
13. Xiongfa J, Hao Z, Liming Z, et al., 2018, Recent advances in 29. Susapto HH, Alhattab D, Abdelrahman S, et al., 2021,
3D bioprinting for the regeneration of functional cartilage. Ultrashort peptide bioinks support automated printing of
Regen Med, 13(1):73–87. large-scale constructs assuring long-term survival of printed
tissue constructs. Nano Lett, 21(7):2719–2729.
14. Ng WL, Lee JM, Zhou M, et al., 2020, Vat polymerization-
based bioprinting—Process, materials, applications and 30. Kahin K, Khan Z, Albagami M, et al., 2019, Development of
regulatory challenges. Biofabrication, 12(2):022001. a robotic 3D bioprinting and microfluidic pumping system
15. Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S, et al., 2019, for tissue and organ engineering. Microfluidics, BioMEMS,
Extrusion bioprinting of soft materials: An emerging and Medical Microsystems XVII, SPIE, 130–139.
technique for biological model fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 31. Alhattab D, Jamali F, Ali D, et al., 2019, An insight into the
6(1):011310. whole transcriptome profile of four tissue-specific human
mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Med, 14(9):841–865.
16. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of
biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120(19):10793–10833. 32. Rajbhandary A, Nilsson BL, 2016, Self-assembling hydrogels,
17. Tekin E, Smith PJ, Schubert US, 2008, Inkjet printing as a In Gels Handbook: Fundamentals, Properties and Application;
deposition and patterning tool for polymers and inorganic Volume 1: Fundamentals of Hydrogels, New Jersey, 219–250.
particles. Soft Matter, 4(4):703–713. 33. Wang X, Horii A, Zhang S, 2008, Designer functionalized
self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for growth,
18. Villar G, Graham AD, Bayley H, 2013, A tissue-like printed
material. Science, 340(6128):48–52. migration, and tubulogenesis of human umbilical vein
endothelial cells. Soft Matter, 4(12):2388–2395.
19. Xu T, Jin J, Gregory C, et al., 2005, Inkjet printing of viable
mammalian cells. Biomaterials, 26(1):93–99. 34. Memic A, Alhadrami HA, Hussain MA, et al., 2016, Hydrogels
2.0: Improved properties with nanomaterial composites for
20. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al., 2022, Controlling biomedical applications. Biomed Mater, 11(1):014104.
droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: Key factors to
achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based 35. Huang L-C, Wang H-C, Chen L-H, et al., 2019, Bioinspired
bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 8(1): 424–440. self-assembling peptide hydrogel with proteoglycan-
assisted growth factor delivery for therapeutic angiogenesis.
21. Zhang LG, Leong K, Fisher JP, 2022, 3D Bioprinting and Theranostics, 9(23):7072–7087.
Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative 36. Unagolla JM, Jayasuriya AC, 2020, Hydrogel-based
Medicine, Academic Press.
3D bioprinting: A comprehensive review on cell-laden
22. Xue K, Zhang X, Gao Z, et al., 2019, Cartilage progenitor hydrogels, bioink formulations, and future perspectives.
cells combined with PHBV in cartilage tissue engineering. J Appl Mater Today, 18:100479.
Transl Med, 17(1):1–11.
37. Susapto HH, Alhattab D, Abdelrahman S, et al., 2021,
23. Weissenberger M, Weissenberger MH, Wagenbrenner M, Ultrashort peptide bioinks support automated printing of
et al., 2020, Different types of cartilage neotissue fabricated large-scale constructs assuring long-term survival of printed
from collagen hydrogels and mesenchymal stromal cells tissue constructs. Nano Lett, 21(7):2719–2729.

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 73 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.719