Page 225 - IJB-9-5
P. 225

International Journal of Bioprinting                                         Hydrogels for 3D bioprinting





















            Figure 3. (a) A schematic diagram of the 3D bioprinting of the porous hydrogel structure of the two-phase emulsion bioink (top) and the conventional
            hydrogel structure (bottom). (b) SEM showing GelMA and PEO porous GelMA hydrogel with a volume ratio of 1:1 (left) and 4:1 (right). (c) The
            viscosity of different proportions of GelMA-PEO emulsion changes with temperature, and the viscosity of 5% pure GelMA is used as the control group.
            (d) Fluorescence micrograph showing the viability of HepG2 cells (human liver cancer cell) encapsulated on day 1, day 3, and day 7. The control group is
                                                                                                 [35]
            the same as the above. (e) The printed scaffold structure: (i) pure GelMA and (ii) GelMA-PEO hydrogel. Reproduced with permission .
































            Figure 4. (a) Schematic diagram of GelMA physical gels (GPGs) bioprinting. (b) SEM showing porous structure with 3% and 5% GPGs concentration.
            (c) Rheological characteristic curves of different concentrations of GPGs. (d) Cell live/dead staining: straight nozzle (top) and tapered nozzle (bottom)
            to print cell viability test in different concentrations of GPGs hydrogel scaffold. (e) A tapered tube printed with 4% GPG bioink maintaining a complete
            shape. Reproduced with permission .
                                   [85]
            printing and  deposition. Then  UV  crosslinking  is   thickness of 0.4 mm. The structure has good fidelity and
            permanently stable. They found that the scaffold structure   will not deform (Figure 4). This new strategy for preparing
            printed with low-concentration GPGs bioink has a smaller   GelMA physical gels is promising to develop the scaffolds
            pore size, higher porosity, and lower stiffness (compression   with high-fidelity structure and  high cell activity to
            modulus of 1.8 KPa). Among the 3%, 4%, and 5% GPGs   improve some of its previous shortcomings.
            bioinks containing cells, low concentrations of GPGs can
            achieve better cell viability and promote cell proliferation   3.3.2. Modified chitosan
            and differentiation. They used 4% GPGs bioink to print   Chitosan  (CH/CS)  has  good  biocompatibility,
            a tapered tube with a layer height of 16 layers and a wall   biodegradability, strong hydrophilicity, and antibacterial


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        217                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.759
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230