Page 522 - IJB-9-5
P. 522

International Journal of Bioprinting                  3D printability and biochemical analysis of orange peel waste



            cultured plate under serum-starved condition (2% FBS) and   amount of xanthan gum added to the ink (Figure 2A).
            incubated for 24 h . To evaluate the potential cytotoxicity   This  observation was  attributed to  the  increase  in  the
                          [32]
            effects induced by the extracts, 20 μL of extracts from orange peel   adhesiveness of the ink by xanthan gum.
            powder, ink and printed samples was added to the cell culture
            medium and incubated for 24 h in 37°C, 5% CO  incubator [31,32] .   3.3. Rheological characterization
                                               2
            The cells were monitored and observed for cell density and   The measurement of the viscosity against shear rate
            morphological alterations before determining cell viability   suggested that  all  ink  formulations  (O20XG4, O20XG6,
            by trypsinization and consecutively, cell counting . The %   O20XG8, and O20XG10) exhibited shear thinning
                                                  [31]
            cell viability was calculated using the formula, i.e., (C /C ) ×    behavior (Figure 2B), which is desirable to perform DIW
                                                       B
                                                     S
            100%, where C  stands for the density of cells exposed to   3D printing of liquid-based materials. This characterization
                        S
            extracts and CB stands for the density of cells exposed to   also suggested that the initial viscosity also decreased with
            control (absence of methanol or extract) . A total of five   an increasing amount of xanthan gum, with 36.9 kPa·s
                                            [31]
            replicates  were  performed  independently  for  each  different   (O20XG4) and 22.5 kPa·s (O20XG10). This observation
            treatment condition.                               indicates that the granular particles within the ink can
                                                               move one another easily with an increased amount of
            3. Results and discussion                          xanthan gum. The reduced frictional forces within the
                                                               ink may result in a smooth mouthfeel once the material
            3.1. Experimental design: Selection of material    is 3D-printed. However, the overall values of the viscosity
            The vast amount of OPW discarded globally is an issue   remained on the same order regardless the amount of
            worth addressing. Orange peel waste has been well studied   xanthan gum, indicating there will be  dominant factors
            to be consumable and nutritious, retaining an abundance   that will determine the viscosity of the food inks (such as
            of polyphenolic compounds such as flavonoids exhibiting   food concentrations and particle sizes).
            antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties . These
                                                  [33]
            properties of OPW have been explored in intracellular   The storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) relates
            oxidative stress studies, and the treatment of OPW on   to the ability of the viscous fluid to store energy elastically.
            cells has been found to significantly reduce inflammatory   Within the viscoelastic region where G′ is greater than G″,
            biomarkers such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα),   the ink behaves in an elastic manner (indicating that the
            thereby reducing oxidative stress that primarily contributes   ink is solid-like material). Beyond the point of intersection
            to cellular dysfunction . Despite these potential benefits,   where  G′ equals to  G″, the ink will begin to deform
                              [33]
            there have been few studies to 3D-print OPW with detailed   inelastically and behave as a liquid-like material. This
            attention to the influence on the biochemical properties,   intersection point was used as an approximation for a yield
            which should provide a solid basis to encourage the use of   stress of the formulated ink. From the G′ and G″ against
            OPW to print health-beneficial snacks.             oscillation stress graph, both the storage modulus and yield
                                                               stress decreased with an increasing amount of xanthan
            3.2. Formulation of inks                           gum added (Figure 2C). The storage modulus decreased
            Sieving the blended OPW is a crucial step in creating   from 53.19 kPa (O20XG4) to 44.24 kPa (O20XG10), while
            printable inks as it prevents particles larger than the inner   yield stress decreased from 680 (O20XG4) Pa to 377 Pa
            diameter of the printer’s nozzle from causing a clog. The   (O20XG10). This observation indicates that the addition of
            ink formulation from O20XG4 to O20XG10 contained   the xanthan gum to the ink lowers the solid-like mouthfeel.
            mixtures of xanthan gum dispersed in deionized water   Crucially, the addition of the xanthan gum also decreases
            at 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, and 1.0%, respectively. The optical   the pressure required to extrude the material from the ink
            images showed a visual change in texture with increasingly   barrel during the 3D printing The measured rheological
            large clumps formed along with the increase in the   properties are summarized (Table 1).


            Table 1. Values of initial viscosity, yield stress, storage moduli, and loss moduli obtained from the rheological analysis performed
            on four OPW inks
             Fruit waste ink    Initial viscosity   Yield stress       Storage moduli      Loss moduli
                                (kPa·s)             (Pa)               (kPa)               (kPa)
             O20XG4             36.9 ± 5.17         680 ± 37           53.19 ± 0.24        8.40 ± 0.17
             O20XG6             27.4 ± 0.73         514 ± 22           50.70 ± 0.34        8.38 ± 0.18
             O20XG8             26.0 ± 0.68         429 ± 10           49.43 ± 0.24        8.84 ± 0.27
             O20XG10            22.5 ± 1.41         377 ± 22           44.24 ± 0.56        8.10 ± 0.19
            All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        514                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.776
   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527