Page 161 - IJOCTA-15-4
P. 161
Green innovation efficiency measurement and its influencing factors in specialized and new enterprises
3. Li JC, Lian GH, Xu AT. An empirical study of various regions of China based on green growth.
digitization-driven greening as a breakthrough Quant Tech Econ Res. 2012;29(2):113-125.
for corporate green transformation under the http://dx.doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2012.02.008.
version of “dual-carbon.” Quant Tech Econ Res. 15. Qian L, Xiao RQ, Chen ZW. Research on green
2023;40(9):27-49. technology innovation efficiency and regional dif-
http://dx.doi.org/10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.20230725.009. ferences of industrial enterprises in China—based
4. Li QY, Xiao ZH. Heterogeneous environmental on metafrontier theory and DEA model. Econ
regulatory tools and corporate green innovation Theory Econ Manag. 2015;(1):18.
incentives—evidence from green patents of listed http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-
firms. Econ Res. 2020;55(9):192-208. 596X.2015.01.004.
5. Wang SH, Guo D. Research on the impact of the 16. Chung YH, Fare R, Grosskopf S. Productiv-
coupled coordination of digitalization and g reen- ity and undesirable outputs: a directional dis-
ing on high-quality innovation of specialized and tance function approach. J Environ Manage.
new enterprises. Res Manag. 2025:1-17. 1997;51(3):229-240.
6. Ernest B, David W. Regulation as a means for the http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jema.1997.0146.
social control of technology. Technol Anal Strateg 17. Fare R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka J. Accounting
Manag. 1994;6(3):259-272. for air pollution emissions in measures of state
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537329408524171. manufacturing productivity growth. J Reg Sci.
7. Lee KH, Min B. Green R&D for eco-innovation 2001;41(3):381-409.
and its impact on carbon emissions and firm per- http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00223.
formance. J Clean Prod. 2015;108(Pt A):534-542. 18. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114. in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res.
8. Wang FZ, Chen FY. Board governance, en- 2001;130(3):498-509.
vironmental regulation and green technology http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-
innovation—empirical test based on listed com- 5.
panies in heavy polluting industries in China. Sci 19. Peng XS. The mechanism and path of green
Res. 2018;36(2):361-369. economy promoting innovative development.
http://dx.doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003- Econ Vertical Horizontal. 2017;(9):56-61.
2053.2018.02.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.16528/j.cnki.22-
9. Tao F, Zhao JY, Zhou H. Does environmental 1054/f.201709056.
regulation achieve “incremental quality improve- 20. Zhang H. Research on the green innovation up-
ment” of green technology innovation—evidence grading path of state-owned manufacturing enter-
from the environmental protection target respon- prises from the perspective of high-quality devel-
sibility system. China’s Ind Econ. 2021;(2):136- opment—taking Chenming Paper Industry as an
154. example. J Jinan Univ (Soc Sci). 2020;30(4):12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2021 21. Fu ZK, He WB. Measurement and improvement
.02.016. of innovation efficiency of “specialized, special
10. Brunnermeier SB, Cohen MA. Determinants and new” enterprises—based on the three-stage
of environmental innovation in US manufac- DEA model. North Finance. 2022;(6):60-65.
turing industries. J Environ Econ Manag. http://dx.doi.org/10.16459/j.cnki.15-
2003;45(2):278-293. 1370/f.2022.06.021.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00058- 22. Yu YG, Yan YN, Shen PY, Li YT, Ni TH. Green
X. financing efficiency and influencing factors of Chi-
11. Zhang G, Zhang XJ. Driven factors of enterprise nese listed construction companies against the
green innovation strategy: a multi-case compar- background of carbon neutralization: a study
ative study. J Zhejiang Univ (Humanit Soc Sci). based on three-stage DEA and system GMM. Ax-
2014;44(1):113-124. ioms. 2022;11(9):467.
12. Zhang X, Wang Y. Effects of environmental reg- http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/axioms11090467.
ulation and R&D investment on green technology 23. Yu YG, Shen PY, Yan YN, Ni TH, Chen FY.
innovation. Sci Technol Prog Countermeasures. Construction enterprises’ green financing effi-
2017;34(17):9. ciency and its influencing factors including in-
http://dx.doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2017010494. ternal and external—based on four-stage DEA
13. Wang H, Feng Z, Yuan L, Lin WF. Green R&D model. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0286043.
intervention by public research institutions and http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286043.
green innovation of enterprises—based on the per- 24. Slater J, Angel T. The impact and implications of
spective of environmental externalities. China Ind environmentally linked strategies on competitive
Econ. 2024;(9):81-99. advantage: a study of Malaysian companies. J
http://dx.doi.org/10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal. Bus Res. 2000;47(1):75-89.
2024.09.005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00053-
14. Zhang JX, Zhu L. Research on technological 8.
innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises in
703

