Page 32 - IJPS-10-3
P. 32

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Prenatal care in Santa Catarina, Brazil



            A  2010  study in  the state  of Rio  Grande do  Sul, with   Regarding the  PHPN  guidelines,  77.2%  of  women
            1,228 women, observed adequacy in 64.6% (Zanchi et al.,   complied with the recommendation to start prenatal care
            2013). Such studies were carried out at the beginning of   before 12 weeks of pregnancy, and 87.3% carried out more
            the last decade and, especially before the implementation   than six prenatal physician office visits, above the average
            of the PHPN (Mario  et al., 2019), which represented a   of other studies (Camargo et al., 2021; Martin et al., 2022;
            great development of prenatal care in Brazil and can be   Oliveira et al., 2021), exceeding the MoH recommendations.
            associated with the best results achieved in this study.  Tomasi et al. (2022) verified these findings in a national
                                                               study spanning 2012, 2014, and 2018, reporting a decline
              The APNCU index (Kotelchuck, 1994) was developed
            to compare populations with varying recommendations   in the proportion of women attending six or more visits
                                                               over time, with 89.1%, 84.3%, and 77.8%, respectively, and
            regarding the frequency and timing of the beginning of   that the highest rates were observed in the Southern region
            prenatal care. This index is not widely used in national   of the country (Tomasi et al., 2022), consistent with our
            research; however, it is important to compare it with   study.
            international studies (Kotelchuck, 1994). With the adapted
            APNCU index (Kotelchuck, 1994), 74.4% of the prenatal   There was a trend in the reduction of supplementary
            care cases were classified as very adequate, along with 5.5%   examinations during  the  prenatal period,  falling  from
            as adequate, totaling 79.9% adequacy.              70% completed examinations in the first trimester to 38%
                                                               in the third trimester. In São José, Santa Catarina, the
              Using this same index, a study carried out in Aracaju,   municipality’s  recommendation of a  greater  number  of
            Northeast Brazil, found adequate/very adequate prenatal   laboratory examinations compared to MoH indications
            care in 66.1% of the cases, with a 26.8% level of inadequacy   resulted in even lower completion values. A study carried
            in prenatal care cases (Ribeiro et al., 2009). The recent studies   out in the state of Minas Gerais, in the Southeast region of
            conducted in America, where the index was developed,   Brazil, also observed this decline, with 31.2% of the routine
            demonstrate similar results to our study findings (Osterman   examinations completed in the first trimester and a mere
            & Martin, 2018; Manjavidze et al., 2020). This suggests that   4.3% in the third trimester (Camargo et al., 2021).
            the southern region of Brazil, despite being a region within
            a  developing  country  with  high  maternal  morbidity  and   It is pertinent to investigate whether these examinations
            mortality rates, exhibits a prenatal quality level comparable   were indeed not performed or if the data reflect an
            to developed countries. However, there is no homogeneity   underreporting throughout pregnancy. Regardless of the
            across different regions of this country, with the North region   cause, the consequence is poorly conducted prenatal care,
            reporting  the lowest adequacy  rates  (Mario  et al., 2019).   with examinations either not being released by the health
            A study in Amapá state in the North of Brazil confirmed this   system or patients’ lack of commitment during pregnancy.
            discrepancy, where only 43.3% of prenatal care was adequate   In Sergipe (Northeast region), 65% of pregnant women
            (Nemer et al., 2021). Furthermore, the analysis carried out   performed all the required examinations; however, the
            with the SINASC data in Rio de Janeiro, in the Southeast   study was carried out by population interview outside the
            region, from 2015 and 2016, revealed even lower adequacy   puerperium period, potentially introducing memory bias
            values (31.55%) (Vale et al., 2021).               (Oliveira & Cavalcanti Filho, 2021).
              Anversa et al. (2012) stratified the quality of prenatal   According to data collected from the pregnant women’s
            care by adding more variables to the assessment and, with   booklet, 15 – 37.6% of them lacked records of double
            the advancement of the levels (from 1 to 4), the assessment   tetanus  immunization  for  adults  (dT)  and  hepatitis  B
            of prenatal care becomes stricter. As shown in our study,   vaccination, reflecting a degree of incompleteness similar
            as the requirements increase, the quality of prenatal care   to findings in another study, where 32.8% of the subjects
            decreases: 83.1% of adequacy was found in the first level   did not have tetanus vaccination records (Vaichulonis et al.,
            – a value similar to the Kessner index modified by Takeda   2021). In a national study from 2018, 90.4% of the subjects
            (1993), but 48.5% in level 4, which includes clinical and   reported complete tetanus vaccine data; however, this relied
            laboratory examinations. In the State of Espírito Santo   on participants’ self-reports, without direct verification
            (Southeast region), a study conducted between the years   (Tomasi et al., 2022). This fragility regarding immunization
            2013 and 2014 with 5030 women, corresponding to about   among  pregnant women  is  due  to  different  factors  such
            half of the pregnant women for the period in the State,   as maternal socioeconomic conditions, insufficient
            revealed a higher prevalence of inadequate prenatal care:   information during prenatal visits, and resources and
            for level 4, prenatal care was considered adequate in 0.16%,   infrastructure deficits (Pedraza & Gomes, 2021).
            intermediate in 33.06%, and inadequate in 66.78% of the   Regarding prescriptions, iron and folic acid
            cases (Maia et al., 2017).                         supplementation was recommended in 77.6% of patients,


            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                        26                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1422
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37