Page 123 - IJPS-10-4
P. 123

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                               Gender disparities in pandemic telehealth use



            advantages of telehealth. Moreover, there is a digital literacy   2.2. Variables
            gap, especially among older female users, which might   2.2.1. Telehealth use
            deter them from embracing telehealth. A previous study
            has highlighted the barriers among older female users in   In this study, telehealth was defined as utilizing video-based
            navigating online patient portals, primarily due to technical   communication with health-care providers. Participants
            difficulties (Zoorob  et al., 2022). Similarly, research on   were surveyed regarding their methods of communication
            participation in telehealth trials for cardiovascular disease   with their regular health-care providers before and during
            risk found that females were more inclined than males to   the COVID-19 outbreak. Response options included
            refuse participation due to technological reasons (Foster   “in-person visits,” “phone calls,” “emails/texts or portal
            et al., 2015). The frustrations due to the recurring need   messages,” and “video calls/telehealth,” with each option
            for technical assistance throughout their use were also   coded as yes = 1 or no = 0 for each category.
            documented (Zoorob et al., 2022).
                                                               2.2.2. Technology access and knowledge
            1.4. Objectives                                    characteristics
            The objective of this study is to investigate the usage status   Technology access in this study refers to ownership of
            and factors of telehealth among male and female adults   digital devices, including having a working cell phone,
            aged over 65 in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic.   computer, or tablet, coded as yes = 1 or no = 0. Technology
            Key research questions include: (i) What are the gender   knowledge is defined as whether participants have learned
            differences in telehealth usage among older adults before   to use a new technology or program (e.g., smartphone,
            and during the COVID-19 pandemic? (ii) how does    computer, iPad, Zoom, or FaceTime) to access online
            health status influence the relationship between gender   services during the COVID-19 outbreak, also coded as
            and telehealth usage during the pandemic? (iii)  what   yes = 1 or no = 0.
            factors are associated with telehealth usage within each   2.2.3. Health characteristics
            gender? We hypothesize that telehealth usage among older
            adults  increased  during  the  COVID-19  pandemic  for   Participants’ overall self-reported health was assessed on a
            both genders, albeit with differences between males and   continuous scale ranging from 1 to 5, where a higher score
            females.  We  further posit that the impact of gender on   indicated poorer self-reported health. Multimorbidity was
            telehealth usage is influenced by the health status of older   defined  as  the  presence  of  multiple  chronic  conditions,
            adults. In addition, we anticipate that socioeconomically   including heart diseases, arthritis, osteoporosis, diabetes,
            advantaged older adults with better health and greater   lung disease, stroke, dementia/Alzheimer’s disease, and
            access to technology and knowledge will be more likely to   cancer, coded as yes = 1 or no = 0.
            engage in telehealth.
                                                               2.2.4. Sociodemographic characteristics
            2. Methods                                         Gender among NHATS participants was categorized
                                                               as “male” or “female.” Age was measured continuously.
            2.1. Study population                              Race/ethnicity was categorized as “White,” “Black,”
            The study utilized data from Round 10 (R10) and    and “others.” Marital status was classified as “married/
            COVID-19 supplement data from the National Health   partnered,” “widowed,” and “unmarried.” Participants’
            and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a longitudinal study   self-rated income was initially divided into four quartiles:
            representing Medicare enrollees aged 65 and older living   “< $23,750 (level 1),” “$23,750 ≤ × < $42,500 (level 2),”
            in the US in 2011 and 2015. The survey collects annual   “$42,500 ≤ × < $75,000 (level 3),” “≥ $75,001 (level 4).”
            information on participants’ health, function, and   An additional category, “missing income (level 5).”
            technological environment. Data for NHATS R10 were   Education level was categorized as “no or high school
            collected via phone during the COVID-19 pandemic   incomplete (level 1),” “completed high school (level 2),”
            outburst. The NHATS participants who completed the   “post-secondary education and some college (level 3),” and
            sample person (SP) interview in R10 were subsequently   “completed college and above (level 4).
            mailed a supplemental COVID-19 questionnaire between
            June 2020 and January 2021. Out of 3,961 SP who    2.3. Statistical analysis
            completed the R10 interview, 3,257 participants or their   First, univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted to
            proxies completed the COVID-19 supplementary survey.   present the characteristics of sociodemographics, health,
            The NHATS data can be retrieved through official requests   and methods of communication with health-care providers
            made at https://www.nhats.org/researcher.          among  male  and female  older  adults. Furthermore,


            Volume 10 Issue 4 (2024)                       117                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1817
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128