Page 129 - IJPS-11-3
P. 129

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                    Family policy from a global perspective



               Handbook on the Sociology of the Family. Cheltenham, UK,   Roberts, L.L. (2019). Changing worldwide attitudes toward
               Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, p.187-204.          homosexuality: The influence of global and region-specific
                                                                  cultures, 1981-2012. Social Science Research, 80:114-131.
               https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544
            Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.003
               perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization   Saraceno, C. (2011). Family policies. Concepts, goals and
               and defamilization.  Journal of European Social Policy,   instruments. In: Carlo Alberto Notebooks. Vol.  230.
               26(1):48-65.                                       Available from: https://www.carloalberto.org/wp-content/
               https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715621712           uploads/2018/11/no.230.pdf [Last accessed on 2023 Oct 05].
            Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2018). Comparing family policies:   Sátyro,  N.,  &  Midaglia,  C.  (2021).  Family  policies  in  Latin
               Approaches, methods and databases. In: Eydal,  G.B., &   American Countries: Re-enforcing familialism. In: Sátyro,
               Rostgaard, T. (eds.). Handbook of Family Policy. Cheltenham,   N., del Pino, E., & Midaglia, C. (eds.). Latin American Social
               UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, p.48-65.        Policy Developments in the Twenty-First Century. Cham:
                                                                  Palgrave Macmillan. p. 287-314.
               https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784719340.00012
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61270-2_10
            Lück, D., & Castrén, A. (2018). Personal understandings and
               cultural conceptions of family in European societies.   Saxonberg, S. (2013). From defamilialization to degenderization:
               European Societies, 20(5):699-714.                 Toward a new welfare typology.  Social Policy and
                                                                  Administration, 47(1):26-49.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1487989
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2012.00836.x
            Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families 1999 to 2009:
               A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and   Seltzer,  J.A.  (2019).  Family  change  and  changing  family
               Family, 72(4):805-827.                             demography. Demography, 56(2):405-426.
               https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00732.x     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00766-6

            Neyer, G. (2021).  Welfare state regimes, family policies,  and   Sherkat, D.E. (2003). Religious socialization. Sources of influence
               family behaviour. In: Schneider, N.F., & Kreyenfeld, M.   and influences of agency. In: Dillon, M. (ed.). Handbook of
               (eds.). Research Handbook on the Sociology of the Family.   the Sociology of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University
               Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, p.   Press, p.151-163.
               22-41.                                             https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807961.012
               https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975544.00009     Son, K. (2024). Ship of Theseus: From ILO standards to outcome
            Nieuwenhuis, R., & Van Lancker, W. (2020a). A  multilevel   of maternity protection policy.  Journal of Social Policy,
               perspective on family policy. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., & Van   53(1):189-217.
               Lancker, W. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Family Policy.      https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279422000010
               Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, p.3-24.
                                                               Spasova, S., Baeten, R., Coster, S., Ghailani, D., Peña-Casas, R.,
               https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2_1        & Vanhercke, B. (2018). Challenges in Long-term Care in
            Nieuwenhuis, R., & Van Lancker, W. (eds.). (2020b). The Palgrave   Europe. A Study of National Policies. European Social Policy
               Handbook of Family Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave   Network. Brussels: European Commission.
               Macmillan.                                         https://doi.org/10.2767/84573
               https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54618-2       Surkyn, J., & Lesthaeghe, R. (2004). Value orientations and
            Nygren, K., Naujanienė, R., & Nygren, L. (2018). The notion of   the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern,
               family in Lithuanian and Swedish social legislation. Social   Western and Southern Europe: An update. Demographic
               Policy and Society, 17(4):651-663.                 Research, 3:45-86.
               https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000192          https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3
            Ooms, T. (2019). The evolution of family policy: Lessons learned,   Therborn, G. (2004). Between Sex and Power. Family in the
               challenges, and hopes for the future.  Journal of Family   World 1900-2000. London, New York: Routledge.
               Theory and Review, 11(1):18-38.                    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203643297
               https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12316              Therborn, G. (2014). Family systems of the world: Are they
            Pettinicchio, D. (2012). Current explanations for the variation   converging? In: Treas, J., Scott, J., & Richards, M. (eds.). The
               in same-sex marriage policies in Western countries.   Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families.
               Comparative Sociology, 11(4):526-557.              1  ed. United States: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., p.3-19.
                                                                   st
               https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341234          https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118374085.ch1


            Volume 11 Issue 3 (2025)                       123                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.1993
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134