Page 94 - IJPS-7-1
P. 94

Contraception and abortion in Nepalese young women


           Table 5. (Continued)
           Characteristics                     N         Unsafe abortion     Safe abortion    Chi square test p
             Province
              Province 1                       10            60.0               40.0
              Madhesh                          13            15.4               84.6
              Bagmati                          14            71.4               28.6
              Gandaki                          10            50.0               50.0
              Lumbini                          16            50.0               50.0
              Karnali                          11            54.5               45.5
              Sudurpaschim                     9             44.4               55.6
           Wealth index
              Poorest                          7             42.9               57.1
              Poor                             16            31.3               68.8
              Middle                           15            53.3               46.7
              Rich                             20            60.0               40.0
              Richest                          25            52.0               48.0
             Education
              No education                     10            20.0               80.0
              Primary                          16            37.5               62.5
              Some secondary                   29            58.6               41.4
              SLC or Higher                    28            57.1               42.9
           Knowledge
             Knowledge of legal status of abortion                                                 *
              No                               42            40.5               59.5
              Yes                              41            58.5               41.5
           Percentages were weighted. Percent may not sum to 100 due to rounding. SLC: School leaving certificate. The statistical tests were based on the Chi-square tests. *P ≤ 0.05;
           **P ≤ 0.01

             Of the total recent 17 abortions reported by young women in the Tarai area in the past 5 years, 88% were performed
           at “safe” facilities, while the corresponding figures for other caste/ethnic groups were 38% for Chhetri/Bahun high castes,
           41% for Janajati or indigenous ethnic groups, and 44% for Dalit castes (Table 5). The number of children ever born was
           also significantly associated with abortion safety. A large proportion (73%) of young women without having live birth
           were putting them at risk of going to “unsafe” health facilities for an abortion. More young women (51%) with one child
           ever born also took recourse to “unsafe” health facilities for abortion, while nearly one-third (65%) young women with
           two or more children ever born visited “safe” abortion health facilities for abortion (Table 5).
             Proportionately, more women not currently using contraception were accessing safe abortion service than those who
           were using any contraception, although the relationship is not statistically significant. Women not using contraception
           were accessing “unsafe” abortion service; perhaps, the pregnancy was unplanned or was due to forced sex. For wealth
           quintiles and education, it appears that accessing safe abortion services decrease with rising economic status and education,
           although the association is not statistically significant. Higher proportion (60%) of women having no knowledge of the
           legal status of abortion were reporting accessing safe abortion service compared to their counterparts (42%) aware of the
           legal status of abortion (Table 5).
           3.4. Safe abortion in Gorkha project area

           The implementation of the PHD Group women empowerment and the safe abortion project in Gorkha has some good
           experience to share. The project was supplementing the government’s efforts of expanding safe abortion services in the
           country. The PHD Group does not have its own service infrastructure rather it uses the government infrastructure, health
           sector in this case, for project implementation. It is a Public-Private Partnership model in that NGOs or private sectors


           88                                              International Journal of Population Studies | 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99