Page 32 - IJPS-7-2
P. 32

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                         Gender gap in life expectancy in South and East Europe




            Table 1. Estimation output of the GMM/DPD model abc
             Variable                                  Coefficient     Standard error     t‑statistic     p
            Gender gap in LEAB (MGG, -1)                 −0.1107          0.0626           −1.7681       0.0780
            Difference in employment rate by sex (-1)    0.0061           0.0142           0.4266        0.6699
            Difference in unemployment by sex            −0.0155          0.0212           −0.7311       0.4652
            Gini index (-2)                              0.2621           0.0989           2.6509        0.0084
            Percent of urban population in total population  −0.0506      0.0250           −2.0253       0.0436
            GDP per capita (-2)                          0.6038           0.3032           1.9913        0.0473
            Health expenditure as percentage of GDP      −0.0074          0.0277           −0.2671       0.7895
            GDP growth rate                              0.0066           0.0043           1.5349        0.1258
            LEAB (-1)                                    −0.2479          0.0663           −3.7347       0.0002
            Percent of females completed secondary education (-1)  0.0222  0.0349          0.6371        0.5245
            Instrument specification:
            Gender gap in LEAB (MGG,-1)
            Difference in employment by sex (-1)
            Difference in unemployment by sex
            GDP per capita (-2)
            Gini index (-2)
            Percent of urban population in total population
            Health expenditure as % of GDP
            GDP growth rate
            LEAB (-2)
            Percent of females completed secondary education (-1)
            Constant added to Instrument list
            Cross-section fixed (first differences)
            Mean dependend var                           −0.0377
            S.E.of regression                            0.2736
            J-statistic                                  2.4129
            S.D. dependent var                           0.1634
            Sum squared resid                            24.621
            Instrument rank                               10
            Note: The coefficients were obtained from GMM/DPD with gender gap in LEAB (MGG) as the dependent variable and the first differences as
            transformation from the 339 unbalanced panel observations among 24 countries in South and East Europe in 1995 – 2019. A Negative values in the
            parentheses refers to the number of lag of the given  variable.  Fixed weights standard errors from estimation.  Transformation: First differences.
                                                                                  b
                                                   a
            c Difference specification instrument weighting matrix.
            education with the 1-year lag. Furthermore, the lagged   Table 2. Arellano‑Bond serial correlation test outputs
            variable of the dependent variable MGG is significant and   Test order  m‑Statistic  rho  SE (rho)  p
            negative at p < 0.10.
                                                               AR (1)       −2.1669   −1.5263   0.7043   0.0302
              Table 2 displays the results for a serial correlation test   AR (2)  0.6763  0.6616  0.9784  0.4989
            of both the first- and second-order serial correlation. The
            tests results show that the first-order statistic is statistically   Note: The test includes 339 unbalanced panel observations for 24
                                                               South and East European countries from 1994 to 2019. Pearson’s
            significant at p < 0.05 and with a negative auto-correlation   product moment correlation coefficient rho is a measure of the linear
            coefficient which is what is expected if the model error terms   relationship and m-statistic denotes the population and sample mean.
            are serial uncorrelated in levels. In our case, the second-  4. Discussion
            order statistic is statistically not significant at p < 0.1. These
            results are expected if the error terms of the model are serial   Our findings concerning economic development and
            uncorrelated in levels (Arellano & Bond, 1991).    demographic factors and their effect on gender gap in LEAB


            Volume 7 Issue 2 (2021)                         26                     https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v7i2.389
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37