Page 68 - IJPS-7-2
P. 68

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                Age-adjusted measures for fertility transition




            Table 1. Myer’s Indices of age misreporting in the DHS data for women from Ghana, Kenya, Rwanda, and Zimbabwe
                          DHS1988       DHS1993        GHS1998       GDHS2003         GDHS2008        DHS2014
            Ghana
             n              3,156         3,204         3,229           3,694           2,950           5,456
             MI             15.6          12.3          12.6            10.7             12.8           9.0
                          DHS1989       DHS1993        DHS1998       KDHS2003         KDHS2008        DHS2014
            Kenya
             n              4,778         4,583         4,847           4,876           5,041          19,036
             MI             10.6           8.3           9.6            7.0              9.9            9.6
                                        DHS1992        DHS2000       RDHS2005         RDHS2010        DHS2014
            Rwanda
             n                            3,698         4,891           5,458           6,834           6,890
             MI                            6.8           6.8            6.8              6.8            6.8
                          DHS1988       DHS1994        DHS1999       DHS2005/06       DHS2010/11      DHS2015
            Zimbabwe
             n              2,973         3,469         4,203           6,154           6,543           6,015
             MI              8.5           8.6          10.8            6.2              8.8            6.1


            & Pazvakawambwa, 2012; Locoh, 2002; Potts & Marks,   and has a predictable constant change over time.
            2001; Upadhyay & Karasek, 2012). The DHS data are   Socioeconomic variables such as household wealth status,
            publicly available on Measure DHS portal.          rural-urban residence, and contraceptive which are widely
                                                               used in fertility analysis do not have a constant rate of
            2.1.1. Ethics requirements                         change over time and are, therefore, not reliable for basing
            This  study did  not  require  ethics  clearance,  because it   fertility rates on. However, they are important factors for
            was based on secondary data. The DHS data are collected   understating fertility transitions. We used education as one
            with ethics  clearance from each host country’s relevant   of the independent variables, because it has been widely
            institutional review boards (IRBs). The data are publicly   shown to play a significant role in the onset and progress of
            available on Measure DHS website https://dhsprogram.  fertility transition in sub-Saharan African countries.
            com/data/available-datasets.cfm. To access the data,   2.3. Data quality analysis
            researchers must register as a DHS data user. The access
            to the datasets is granted to legitimate research purposes.  The first consideration when conducting fertility analysis
                                                               using DHS data is the quality of the data. The early surveys
            2.2. Variables                                     especially from the DHS Phases I and II from some SSA
            The dependent variables for this study were ASMFRs and   countries have been noted to have problems of data quality
            CEB. These two variables were used, because they represent   due to misreporting of dates and ages which adversely
            age-adjusted and cumulative and non-adjusted measures   affect the accuracy of fertility rates for age. The adverse
            of fertility, respectively. The ASMFRs constitute the   impact of poor quality in DHS data is that if subsequent
            constituents of the TMFR. Because the TMFR is derived   surveys have improved quality, demographic trends may
            from ASMFRs, it is defined as the total number of live   be erroneously shown to have occurred when in fact it was
            births that a woman is expected to have by the end of her   only improvements in the data. The previous assessments
            reproductive career if she remains married and experiences   of quality issues in DHS data have indeed highlighted the
            the given ASMFRs. The CEB measures that the cumulative   problem of age heaping whereby respondents showed bias
                                                               toward stating ages ending in digits zero and five (Pullum,
            total number of children a woman has given birth to in her   2006). In analyzing fertility rates, age misreporting can
            lifetime, thus reflects actual achieved fertility.
                                                               have an adverse effect on the resulting age distribution of
              The independent variables were age group and     fertility rates and can distort the results on the differences/
            education. Age is the main demographic characteristic   similarities between two time points of the same country.
            used as the basis for calculating fertility indicators, because   Given that this study was designed to determine the
            it does not change its form from population to population   accuracy of two types of measures of fertility levels which


            Volume 7 Issue 2 (2021)                         62                     https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v7i2.354
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73