Page 79 - IJPS-7-2
P. 79

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                           Traders’ KAP toward solid waste disposal in Nigeria



            River State, Nigeria. Calabar municipality is a Local   routes and methods of disposing wastes such as burning,
            Government Area in Cross River State, South Nigeria.   dumping in gutters, or dumping in open places. A correct
            It is the capital city of Cross River State bounded to the   statement with options “Always,” “sometimes,” or “never”
            North by Odukpani LGA; to the West by Akpabuyo LGA;   was given 3, 2, and 1, respectively. The expected maximum
            to the East by Kwa River; and in the South by Calabar   total practice score was 12 and the minimum score was 4.
            South LGA. The common occupation practiced among   The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of the KAP were 0.84,
            the people is trading and fishing. Christianity is the widely   0.85, and 0.90, respectively, denoting acceptable internal
            practiced religion in the area. From a census conducted in   consistency (Taber, 2018). Mean scores were used to
            2006, Calabar Municipality has a population of 183,681   categorize KAP into two levels such that respondents who
            people. The following markets are found in the area; 8   scored within and above the mean had good knowledge,
            miles Market, Marmi Market, Ikot Ishie market, Marian   acceptable attitude, and good practice while those who
            market, Akim market, and Edim-otop Market.         scored below the mean had poor knowledge, unacceptable
              This cross-sectional descriptive study employed a   attitude, and poor practice of solid waste disposal.
            quantitative approach to determine the KAP of 480 sampled   2.3. Analytical strategy
            market traders toward solid waste disposal in the study area.
            The sample size was determined using Fisher’s formula   Associations  between  respondents’  sociodemographic
            for estimating the sample size for cross-sectional studies   characteristics (gender, age, educational level, marital
            as cited in Charan & Biswas (2013). A  semi-structured   status, and religion) and KAP level were analyzed using a
            questionnaire which was the interviewer administered   Chi-square of independence. These variables were selected
            was utilized. Distribution of the questionnaires for data   based on our theoretical assumption that these factors are
            collection was done based on a derived interval from one   relevant in studying solid waste management in the specified
            shop or stand in each selected line to another until the   population (Agwu, 2012; Al-Khatib et al., 2009; Jatau, 2013).
            required number  of respondents  in each of  the  markets   All sociodemographic characteristics and their respective
            was reached.                                       categories are found in Table 1. Variables identified to be
                                                               statistically significant in the Chi-square analyses were
            2.2. Measurements                                  inputted in three separate multivariable logistic regression
            Data were first entered into Microsoft Excel 2016 to   models for all three outcome variables (KAP). The statistical
            compute the knowledge scores. Data were transferred to   significance threshold was set at α = 0.05.
            and analyzed using SPSS Version 23. The outputs were   3. Results
            subjected to descriptive and inferential statistical analysis
            and quantitative data were summarized in means and   3.1. Sociodemographic data of respondents
            standard deviation while being presented on frequency   Four hundred and eighty respondents (n = 480) participated
            tables. Seven practical questions assessed the knowledge of   in this study accounting for a 100% response rate. The
            respondents with the questions requiring “yes,” “no,” or “I   sociodemographic characteristics of the participants are
            don’t’ know” responses. The questions elicited information   presented in  Table 1. Slightly over half (54.4%) of the
            on traders’ knowledge of appropriate measures, types of   respondents were female. The average age of participants
            disease outbreaks that can occur, disease transmission,   was 28.35  years ± 8.73 (with a range of 16 – 50  years).
            and health implications. The expected maximum total   A little over half of the respondents (51.0%) had attained
            knowledge score was 7. A  higher score implied a better   secondary education. More respondents in this present
            knowledge of solid waste disposal. Each correct knowledge   study were single (47.9%). In terms of religion, most of the
            response was allotted a score of 1 while incorrect responses   respondents (77.3%) were Christians.
            were allotted a score of 0. Four practical questions were
            used to assess the attitude of participants. This section   Table 2 outlines the KAP levels  of respondents
            elicited information on reactions due to proximity of   according to the scores obtained. Slightly over half of the
            appropriate disposal points, lack of sanctions, use of   market traders (54.0%) had good knowledge of solid waste
            abandoned lands, and time factor when considering   disposal and management after obtaining satisfactory
            dumping waste. A correct statement with options “Strongly   knowledge scores (M = 3.66, SD = 1.70). Almost half of
            agree,” “Agree,” “Disagree,” or “Strongly disagree” was given   the market traders (46%) had poor knowledge of solid
            4, 3, 2, and 1, respectively. The expected maximum total   waste disposal and management. In terms of attitude,
            attitude score was 16 and the minimum score was 4. Four   most of the market traders (55.0%) had an unfavorable
            practical questions were used to assess the practice of   attitude toward solid waste disposal and management
            participants. This section elicited information on dumping   (M = 9.22, SD = 2.41). Regarding practices, a high 84% of


            Volume 7 Issue 2 (2021)                         73                     https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v7i2.307
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84