Page 67 - IJPS-8-1
P. 67

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                          Intergenerational relationships and caregiving burden



















































            Figure 1. Literature search and selection process.

            studies were not about caregivers of 60+ older adults; (b) 35   whereas other studies did not specifically restrict the health
            studies did not focus on intergenerational relationships; (c)   status of the care recipients. Regarding the characteristics
            eight studies did not focus on caregiver burden, and (d) 10   of caregivers, five studies included only adult children as
            studies were not quantitative. The two authors performed   caregivers (Aires, Mocellin, Fengler, et al., 2017; Lin, Chen,
            the entire selection process independently to ensure   and Li, 2012; Liu and Bern-Klug, 2016; Queluz, de Santis,
            consistent and complete screenings of all eligible studies.   de Fatima Kirchner, et al., 2022; Wu, Liu, Cao, et al., 2021).
            Eight studies were finally included in the structured full   The kinship between caregivers and care recipients in the
            paper review for data extraction and synthesis. The detailed   other three studies was more diverse. Lopez-Anuarbe
            data extraction results are shown in Table 1.      and Kohli (2019) focused on male caregivers, with sons
                                                               accounting for approximately 50%, and del-Pino-Casado
            3. Results                                         et al. (2014) focused on primary home caregivers of
            3.1. Study characteristics                         older relatives, with children accounting for 60.1%. In
                                                               both studies, the researchers conducted separate analyses
            We utilized a pre-developed data extraction template to   of the children subgroup and thus were included in this
            synthesize study characteristics from each study, and a   review. Enright et al. (2020) adopted a small sample size;
            summary of the eight included studies is found in Table 1.  the participant sample included 58 informal caregivers
              All  eight  studies used a  cross-sectional design.   of persons with dementia, including 20 adult children.
            Concerning the characteristics of the care recipients, only   This study was also included in this review because of the
            Enright et al. (2020) targeted older adults with dementia,   relatively large proportion of children in the sample, which


             Volume 8 Issue 1 (2022)                        61                    https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v8i1.1320
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72