Page 68 - IJPS-8-1

International Journal of
Population Studies Intergenerational relationships and caregiving burden

Summary of main results Children who were more involved with the ADLs and provided financial support showed higher levels of overload The subjective burden was negatively associated with reciprocity in the offspring group Current caregiver/care recipient relationship quality significantly moderates the association between perceived identity change and caregiver burden Caregiver’s burden significantly influences caregive

Caregiver burden measurement Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI; Novak and Guest, 1989) Caregiver Strain Index (CSI; Robinson, 1983) Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI; Zarit, Orr and Zarit, 1985) Burden Assessment Scale (BAS; Reinhard and Horwitz, 1995) Worry about performance: two items from the ZBI, that is, “Do you feel you should be doing more for your parent?” and “Do you feel you should do a better job in caring for your

Intergenerational relationship- related variable (V); measurement (M) • V=care behaviors • M=instrumental support (ADLS/ IADLS), emotional support, financial support, keeping company, and visits • V=reciprocity • M= “The care recipient is very grateful, and this gratifies and compensates me.” 5-point Likert- type scale (strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or strongly disagree) • V=relationship quality • M=Burns

Basic theory NA NA NA Conservation of resources theory Pearlin’s Stress Process Model

Analyze the association between filial responsibility and the overload of the children when caring for their older parents Analyze the effect of cultural factors on the subjective burden of primary home caregivers Examine the associations between informal caregivers’ perception of identity change in their care partner, the quality of the caregiver/care recipient relationship, and caregiver Figure out the relationshi

Study aim Sample size; kinship • 100 caregiver children • 208 primary home caregivers of older relatives (65 years of of older relatives • 58 informal caregivers • sons (n=3) daughters burden • 502 adult children who were married and had parents who were over caregiver burden daughters (n=304) • 895 dyads of adult- child caregivers and their oldest parent daughters (n=503) variation of WaP

Table 1. Detailed data extraction result. Study design; location; year Cross-sectional; of older adults Brazil; 2015 • daughters (n=74) others (n=26) Cross-sectional; Spain; 2010 age and over) • offspring (n=125) spouse (n=64) others (n=19) Cross-sectional; of persons with Canada; 2009 dementia (n=17) spouse (n=35) others (n=3) Cross-sectional; Taiwan; NA 65 years old • sons (n=198) Cross-sectional; (Liu and Bern- China; 200

Authors; year
Klug, 2016)
Mocellin,
(Aires,

Volume 8 Issue 1 (2022) Fengler, et al., 2017) (del-Pino- Casado, Millán-Cobo, Palomino- Moral, et al.,2014) (Enright, O’Connell, Branger, et al., 2020) 62 (Lin, Chen, and Li, 2012) https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v8i1.1320