Page 134 - ITPS-7-2

INNOSC Theranostics and
Pharmacological Sciences PI3K-α inhibitors for cancer immunotherapy

outcomes. J Oncol. 2012;2012:192464. Michaelis M, Wass MN. 3DLigandSite: Structure-based
prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res.
doi: 10.1155/2012/192464
2022;50(W1):W13-W20.
31. Mirzaei S, Ghodsi R, Hadizadeh F, Sahebkar A. 3D-QSAR-
Based pharmacophore modeling, virtual screening, and doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac250
molecular docking studies for identification of tubulin 42. Mukhopadhyay A, Borkakoti N, Pravda L. Finding
inhibitors with potential anticancer activity. Biomed Res Int. enzyme cofactors in Protein Data Bank. Bioinformatics.
2021;2021:6480804. 2019;35(18):3510-3511.
doi: 10.1155/2021/6480804 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz115
32. Wasukan N, Kuno M, Maniratanachote R. Molecular docking 43. Torrance JW, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. Evolution of
as a promising predictive model for silver nanoparticle- binding sites for zinc and calcium ions playing structural
mediated inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes. J Chem roles. Proteins. 2008;71(2):813-830.
Inf Model. 2019;59:5126-5134.
doi: 10.1002/prot.21741
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00572
44. Zhao J, Cao Y, Zhang L. Exploring the computational
33. Dibia KT, Igbokwe PK, Ezemagu GI, Asadu CO. Exploration methods for protein-ligand binding site prediction. Comput
of the quantitative structure-activity relationships for Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:417-426.
predicting cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition bioactivity by doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.02.008
machine learning approaches. Results Chem. 2022;4:100272.
45. Roche DB, Brackenridge DA, McGuffin LJ. Proteins and
doi: 10.1016/j.rechem.2021.100272
their interacting partners: An introduction to protein-
34. Chen X, Liu M, Gilson MK. BindingDB: A web-accessible ligand binding site prediction methods. Int J Mol Sci.
molecular recognition database. Comb Chem High 2015;16:29829-29842.
Throughput Screen. 2001;4(8):719-725.
doi: 10.3390/ijms161226202
doi: 10.2174/1386207013330670
46. Kudo G, Hirao T, Yoshino R, Shigeta Y, Hirokawa T. Pocket
35. Liu T, Lin Y, Wen X, Jorissen RN, Gilson MK. BindingDB: to concavity: A tool for the refinement of protein-ligand
A web-accessible database of experimentally determined binding site shape from Alpha spheres. Bioinformatics.
protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;39(4):btad212.
2007;35:D198-D201.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad212
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl999
47. Heifetz A, Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M. Electrostatics
36. Bateman A, Martin MJ, Orchard S, et al. UniProt: The in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 2009;11(3):571-587.
universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. doi: 10.1110/ps.26002
2023;51(D1):D523-D531.
48. Palma PN, Krippahl L, Wampler JE, Moura JJ. Bigger: A new
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1052
(soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions.
37. Fan C, Chen M, Wang X, Wang J, Huang B. A review on Proteins. 2000;39(4):372-384.
data preprocessing techniques toward efficient and reliable doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000601)39:4<372:AID-
knowledge discovery from building operational data. Front PROT100>3.0.CO;2-Q
Energy Res. 2021;9:652801.
49. Adiyaman R, McGuffin LJ. Methods for the refinement of
doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.652801
protein structure 3D models. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2301.
38. Alasadi SA, Bhaya WS. Review of data preprocessing techniques doi: 10.3390/ijms20092301
in data mining. J Eng Appl Sci. 2017;12(16):4102-4107.
50. Madhavi G, Adzhigirey M, Day T, Annabhimoju R,
doi: 10.3923/jeasci.2017.4102.4107
Sherman W. Protein and ligand preparation: Parameters,
39. Kanwar G, Kumar A, Mahajan A. Open source software protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments.
tools for computer aided drug design. Int J Res Pharm Sci. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2013;27(3):221-234.
2018;9(1):86-95.
doi: 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8
doi: 10.26452/ijrps.v9i1.1191
51. Lerm JA, Meyners C, Christmann A, et al. Binding pocket
40. Lindahl ER. Molecular dynamics simulations. Methods Mol stabilization by high-throughput screening of yeast display
Biol. 2008;443:3-23. libraries. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:1023131.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-177-2_1 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1023131
41. McGreig JE, Uri H, Antczak M, Sternberg MJE, 52. Müller I. Guidelines for the successful generation of protein-

Volume 7 Issue 2 (2024) 24 doi: 10.36922/itps.2340