Page 48 - JCAU-5-1
P. 48

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                               Microbial technologies: Toward a regenerative architecture
























            Figure 1. Environmentally regenerative “living cities” are enabled by microbial technologies that perform building operations based on an ecosystem of
                                            ®
            microbial fuel cell-based technologies—PeePower , Living Architecture, and Active Living Infrastructure: Controlled Environment, providing a range of
            ecosystem services and energy for low powered electronic devices that can be housed in biodegradable microbially-produced biomaterials. Source: Figure
            courtesy of Rachel Armstrong, 2023.
            —  much like soil biofilms  in natural ecosystems.  MFCs
            also act as biosensors by generating voltage, which linearly
            correlates with specific quantities of toxins like heavy metals
            (copper, chromium, and zinc), and organic compounds
            (p-nitrophenol [PNP], formaldehyde, levofloxacin) (Zhou
            et al., 2017). In this sense, MFCs are completely unlike
            batteries or other types of modern utilities, which are
            designed to process one type of resource at a time and
            are, therefore, well placed as a technological platform for
            meeting the SDGs.  Providing a foundational platform that
                           4
            can change the impacts of human settlement across a range
            of parameters, MFCs catalyze the transformation of a range
            of organic wastes (e.g., urine, greywater, and blackwater
            which are feedstock for microbes) into bioelectricity
            while simultaneously providing environmental services
            (bioremediation, detoxification, and water purification)
            generating an overall net-positive impact on ecosystem   Figure  2. Technical  diagram showing electrons produced from an
            health.                                            anaerobic biofilm that are captured by electrodes to produce electricity
                                                               while performing ecosystem services (bioremediation of wastewater).
            6. State-of-the-art                                Source: Courtesy of Rachel Armstrong, 2019.
            MFCs are not the only microbial technological platform
            to process waste into a range of new resources. Anaerobic   reduces pathogens. MFCs, however, have some advantages
            digestion in  biodigesters also produces fuel (biogas)   over biodigesters as they produce electricity without
            removes biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) from sewage,   combustion, act as sensors, and can be used for the
            conserves nutrients (especially nitrogen compounds), and   treatment of low concentration substrates at temperatures
                                                               below 20°C, where anaerobic digestion generally fails to
                                                               function. This creates specific application niches for MFCs
            4     MFCs contribute to the following SDGs: 6 via clean water   that do not compete with, but complement, anaerobic
              and sanitation; 7 providing affordable and clean energy; 11 by   digestion technology. MFCs still face important limitations
              creating a platform for sustainable cities and communities; 4
              enabling quality education via bioremediating digital services;   in terms of large-scale application including investment
              17 in creating partnerships for the goals by strengthening   costs, upscale technical issues, and the factors limiting
              the means of implementation and revitalizing the global   the  performance,  both in  terms  of  anodic  and  cathodic
              partnership for sustainable development Technology.  electron transfer (Pham et al., 2006). To date, MFCs have



            Volume 5 Issue 1 (2023)                         4                         https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.157
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53