Page 32 - JCAU-5-4
P. 32

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                            Floral strategies for regenerative design






















            Figure  1. Diagram of key flower structures by Mariana Ruiz.
            Source:  https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:  Mature_flower_
            diagram.svg (Accessed August 08, 2023)
                                                               Figure 2. Echinacea (an inspiration for XENO). Source: Photo by Anna
            pollinators find themselves ensnared in exquisitely designed   Vershinina
            environments full of sensory delights. By spreading another
            organism’s  sperm,  pollinators are  therefore  engaged in
            a vegetal tryst, which can be so precisely orchestrated
            that only a particular type of creature and its associated
            behavior is invited. Thus, a compelling choreography of
            body and space begins (Figure 2).
              Charles  Darwin  first  noted the  exquisite  relationship
            between orchids and their pollinators, with more than
            28,000 species of these plants worldwide (Darwin, 2015).
            One of the most common tactics that orchids use to lure
            insects toward their pollen is by producing fragrant oils or
            nectar. For example, the vanilla orchid produces a sweet
            fragrance that attracts bees and butterflies. Some orchids
            also mimic the appearance and scent of female insects to
            attract male pollinators. The  Ophrys orchid produces a
            flower that resembles a female bee, complete with a scent   Figure 3. Insect mimicry by orchids. Source: Photo by Rolf Hughes, 2023
            that mimics its pheromones, which attracts male bees who
            attempt to mate with it, becoming showered in pollen   morganii praedicta) was finally discovered in 1903 by the
            during the process. Other orchids have evolved to attract   entomologist Frederick William Edwards who recognized
            specific species of pollinators through a range of highly   it from Darwin’s predictions, which was instantly
            unique features (Figure 3). The bucket orchid, for example,   recognizable by possessing an exceptionally long tongue in
            has a deep, conical shape that forces its bee pollinators to   a later collaboration between entomologists at the Muséum
            crawl deep inside the flower to reach the nectar. As they do   National  d’Histoire  Naturelle  (France)  and  the  Natural
            so, the bee is coated in pollen and must exit the flower by a   History Museum (United  Kingdom), which was  led by
            specific path, thus ensuring pollination of other flowers of   Professor Joël Minet, where the average tongue length
            the same species.                                  for the Wallace’s sphinx moth was shown to be 21.97 cm
              Orchids also use visual cues to attract pollinators. The   (8.6 in) in females and 20.65 cm (8.1 in) in males (Figure 4;
            Dracula orchid, for instance, produces dark, reddish-  Minet et al., 2021).
            black flowers with long, dangly petals that resemble a   2.2. Investigating alternative ways of experiencing
            bat, which draws the attention of fruit flies, its  primary   the world
            pollinators. Such relationships are so specific that Darwin
            even predicted the existence of moths with extremely long   Pollinating insects have different sensory apparatuses
            mouthparts to reach the nectar at the long tubular base   than we do and their encounters with flowers is likely far
            of the Madagascar star orchid (Angraecum sesquipedale).   different experience than our own. Angiosperms use a
            This pollinator, the Wallace’s sphinx moth (Xanthopan   variety of strategies to compel and overwhelm pollinators


            Volume 5 Issue 4 (2023)                         3                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.1006
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37