Page 75 - JCAU-7-3
P. 75

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                           Creative heritage and experiential tourism



            it the nickname “China’s Gaudi House.” In 2012, following   heritage and creativity are mutually supportive: if restored
            the 2008 Beijing Olympics, a miniature replica of the “Bird’s   heritage represents added value for the creative activities
            Nest” Olympic Stadium, designed by architects Herzog &   hosted there (bringing a cachet of authenticity and
            de Meuron, was added to the roof of China House. Over   historicity), the latter offers new life to the “old stones” and
            the years, the original French-style villa has been almost   contribute to their reintegration into contemporary social
            entirely obscured by a new “Chinese envelope.”     and economic life.
              This project has been both praised and criticized. In   Despite their diverse approaches, the four case studies
            September 2010, the “museum,” along with the Louvre   presented above share a common feature: the “dissonant”
            and the Pompidou Centre, was featured in the American   heritage of the former concessions (Gravari-Barbas
            edition of the Huffington Post as one of the 15 most creative   et al., 2023) today has been “cleaned up” from any negative
            museums in the world. As a private museum, it was also   image. Today, this Western architectural heritage serves
            registered in the Guinness Book of Records. Zhang Lianzhi   as a catalyst for cultural and creative tourism, aligning
            has created a landmark attraction in Tianjin, but in doing   with the vision of local players in repurposing the former
            so, he has completely concealed – and therefore erased   concessions of Tianjin. Although the instrumentalization
            – the building’s colonial architecture. The “Bird’s Nest”   of heritage is a common guideline, the approaches vary
            addition on the roof serves as a symbol of China’s modern   significantly, resulting in distinct tourism products
            identity, reinforcing a narrative of national supremacy over   (Figure 8).
            its Western architectural legacy. Indeed, the interventions   The carefully restored Minyuan Terrace and the
            on the building almost entirely cover, and thus erase, the   redeveloped Xiannong Courtyard, with their new functions
            pre-existing colonial architecture.                and activities, have been transformed into destinations
            4. Discussion                                      for  urban  tourists  and  white-collar  workers  from  the
                                                               Tianjin metropole. These projects are reminiscent of the
            Tianjin presents itself as an emerging laboratory for   festival marketplaces of London’s Covent Garden Market
            heritage conservation, restoration, and reinterpretation,   or Boston’s Faneuil Hall, where significant architecture is
            particularly through recent projects led by both the city   integrated with creative or artisanal commercial functions,
            and private entrepreneurs with a focus on leisure and   serving as a means of giving a new image to central urban
            tourism.                                           areas.
              These examples show that creative approaches in    The New I-Style Town follows the model of edutainment
            China  concern  both (creative) approaches to  restoring,   urban redevelopment projects, characterized by its highly
            reinterpreting, or rebuilding heritage and the introduction   enclosed character, which isolates it from the surrounding
            of new (creative) functions within recently restored or   urban fabric. It lacks residential functions and is primarily
            rebuilt buildings. In the strategies adopted by local players,   specialized in tourism, leisure, and commerce. The


























            Figure 8. Different approaches to the architectural treatment of the four case studies in relation to the planned functions and the resulting tourism development
            Source: Diagram by Maria Gravari-Barbas.


            Volume 7 Issue 3 (2025)                         11                       https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.3703
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80