Page 13 - JCBP-1-1
P. 13

Journal of Clinical and
            Basic Psychosomatics                                                         Brain MRI alterations in MDD



            early in treatment, suggesting that drug treatment alters   the keywords of the search were limited. Third, although
            the relevant brain networks and activation status of brain   exclusion criteria have been set for the retrieved literature,
            regions. If a brain region is activated during task execution,   comedication other than antidepressants was not restricted.
            differences in individual activation levels in that region   Fourth, the results of MRI spectroscopy were not included
            may lead to differences in individual behavior and any   in the study.
            related response to medication treatment. Task-state fMRI
            may provide insight into the neural changes early in drug   6. Current limitations of MRI research in
            treatment. Further research is needed on the reliability of   MDD and future perspectives
            retesting the activation of task-state fMRI regions.  A growing number of studies have examined structural and

            5. Limitations of the review                       fMRI -derived biomarkers of response to drug treatment
                                                               of MDD and showed multiple alterations; however, the
            This narrative review has some limitations. Firstly, only   results lack sufficient replicability and discriminatory
            two databases were searched in our study, and relative   power. We summarized the research findings supported
            studies before 2000 were not included, which resulted in   by moderate evidence, mainly focusing on the changes
            the incomplete inclusion of literature. Second, no blind   in hippocampal volume, amygdala, and ACC activation
            screening was conducted by independent reviewers, and   (Table  1) [19,20,38,41-47,50,51] . Most studies  observed that

            Table 1. fMRI changes and antidepressant treatment outcome in depressed patients using 3.0T scanner

            Study             Case number   fMRI task   Drug therapy      Results after treatment
                             (MDD patients/
                               controls)
            Wang et al. [38]    20/20     No            Escitalopram for 8   FC decreased in the bilateral DMPFC and increased in
                                                        weeks             the bilateral hippocampus.
            Zarate-Garza et al. [19]  21/no controls  No  Sertraline or   Hippocampal volume increased in patients with
                                                        escitalopram for 8 weeks  remission.
            Bartlett et al. [20]  184/ no controls  No  Sertraline or placebo for   Thickening of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex was
                                                        8 weeks           associated with better responses to sertraline.
            Fu et al. [41]      32/25     Emotional Stroop   Duloxetine for 12 weeks  Increased activation in the PCC, parahippocampal
                                          task                            cortex, and precuneus.
            Sankar et al. [42]  23/22     Sternberg task  Duloxetine for 12 weeks  No significant changes in patients.
            Fales et al. [43]   23/18     Emotion       Escitalopram, sertraline,   Increased activation in the dorsolateral
                                          interference task  or paroxetine for 8 weeks  prefrontalcortex and left amygdala.
            Wang et al. [44]    18/18     Emotional     Fluoxetine for 8 weeks  Decreased activationin the right insula and left
                                          judgment task                   anterior cingulate cortex in response to positive
                                                                          stimuli and increased activation in the right middle
                                                                          frontal gyrus in response to negative stimuli.
            Heller et al. [45]  21/14     Emotion       Fluoxetine or     Increased activation in the NA andfronto-striatal
                                          regulation task  venlafaxine for 8 weeks  connectivity.
            Williams et al. [46]  80/34   Emotional faces   Escitalopram, sertraline,   Decreased activation in the amygdala inresponders to
                                          task          or venlafaxine for 8 weeks  happiness, fear, and anger.
            Godlewska et al. [47]  35/29  Emotional faces   Escitalopram for 7 days  Decreased activation in the anterior cingulate, insula,
                                          task                            amygdala, and thalamus in patients responding to
                                                                          antidepressants.
            Preuss et al. [50]  22/no controls  Emotional   SSRI for 6 weeks  Increased activation in PCC, medial prefrontal cortex,
                                          valence task                    thalamus, and middle temporal gyrus in response to
                                                                          positive stimuli.
            Miller et al. [51]  17/no controls  Emotional word   Escitalopram for 8   Lower pre-treatment BOLD responses to negative
                                          processing task  weeks          words in the midbrain, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex,
                                                                          paracingulate, anterior cingulate, thalamus, and caudate
                                                                          nuclei were associated with better responses to treatment.
            Notes: All review findings are qualitative. ACC: Anterior cingulate cortex; BOLD: Blood oxygenlevel-dependent; DMPFC: Dorsomedial prefrontal
            cortex; PCC: Posterior cingulate cortex; NA: Nucleus accumbent; SSRI: The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2023)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcbp.0896
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18