Page 67 - MSAM-1-2
P. 67

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing              Cold spray additive manufacturing of Cu-based materials










































                                                                                                           [46]
            Figure 13. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs and powder size distributions of (A) Cu-5CNT, (B) Cu-5CNT-10AlN, and (C) Cu-5CNT-20AlN .
            (Reprinted from Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 650, Pialago, E. J. T., Kwon, O. K., Kim, M.-S., and Park, C. W., Ternary Cu–CNT–AlN composite
            coatings consolidated by cold spray deposition of mechanically alloyed powders, 199 – 209, 2015, with permission from Elsevier).
            Therefore, due to this density, the deposition of SiC and   and 156.911  W/m-K,  respectively,  at 50°C  increased
            Al O  was good enough as compared to the tungsten   to 209.407  W/m-K and 213.482  W/m-K after the heat
                3
              2
            carbide particles during the cold spray process. The ceramic   treatment of  these  cold-sprayed coatings. Therefore, the
            content  of  copper-SiC  and  copper-Al O   coatings  on  an   merits of copper-alumina coatings seem to be better, but
                                           2
                                             3
            average reported was 7.5 + 3.2 vol.% and 10.5 + 2.7 vol.%,   a thorough research on copper-SiC coatings might bring
            respectively.  The wear  rate  of  pure copper coatings  was   their characteristic properties into light and prove their
            289.57 × 10  mm /Nm and the reported wear rates for   commercial importance .
                                                                                  [47]
                           3
                      -6
            copper-SiC and copper-Al O cold-sprayed coatings
                                    2
                                      3
            were 207.42 × 10  mm /Nm and 70.88 × 10  mm /Nm,   4.4. Copper-graphene coatings
                               3
                          -6
                                                 -6
                                                     3
            respectively. The microhardness values reported for copper-  Graphene is a wonder material, having excellent electrical
            SiC and copper-Al O  were 167.36 Hv and 165.01 Hv,   conductivity, thermal conductivity, and mechanical
                              3
                            2
            which were higher as compared to the cold-sprayed copper   strength [48,49] . Good quality graphene can be produced
            coatings around 159.55 Hv. Again, the nanohardness values   by  chemical  vapor  deposition  (CVD)  method .
                                                                                                           [50]
            of copper-SiC and copper-Al O  coatings are 2.18 GPa and   Graphene nanoplates (GNPs) are widely used in the
                                   2
                                     3
            2.28 GPa, respectively, which are higher than that of pure   production of metal matrix composites as they can be
            copper coatings around 2.06 GPa. Furthermore, according   manufactured  economically  and  in  large  quantities .
                                                                                                           [51]
            to Chen et al., the wear mechanism of pure copper and   Yin  et al.  produced GNP-reinforced copper matrix
                                                                       [52]
            copper-SiC coatings is adhesive in nature, whereas the   coatings intending to improve anti-friction performance.
            copper-Al O  coatings have an abrasive wear mechanism   As reported, ball milling of copper and GNP powders
                    2
                      3
            due to the high bond strength between copper-alumina   was done; thus, copper-GNP (1 vol.%) powder feedstock
            particles. Furthermore, the thermal conductivities of   was  produced.  The  feedstock  was  then  cold  sprayed  on
            copper-SiC and copper-Al O  which were 164.388 W/m-K   an aluminum substrate. Then, a wear test was performed
                                 2
                                   3
            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         11                    https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.12
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72