Page 75 - MSAM-3-2
P. 75

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                             Mechanical properties of NiTi TPMS





















                                                     Figure 10. (Continued).

                         A                       B                       C













                         D                       E                       F














            Figure 11. Fracture morphology of rod-shaped gyroid cellular structures (RGCS) with different aging times. (A) 0 h; (B) 2 h; (C) 4 h; (D) 6 h; (E) 8 h; and
            (F) 10 h.

            fracture zone around t=80 s. At the base of the structure, the   In addition, SGCS-A2 exhibited a vertical downward fault
            micro-rod was bent upward due to compressive stress.  zone in the middle at t=100 s, whereas SGCS-A6 exhibited
                                                                               52
              The initial collapse, as depicted in Figure 10, occurred   a 45° fault. Sun et al.  proposed that SGCS reaches its initial
            at the upper edge of the structure, resulting in fragment   ultimate stress after undergoing elastic deformation and
            formation under pressure. This collapse primarily stemmed   subsequently collapsed, losing a substantial portion of its
            from the stress exerted on the uppermost layer of SGCS   strength. After the initial collapse, the remaining structure
            reaching a local maximum and leading to the compaction   partially regained its strength and experienced a cascading
            of fragments and the formation of voids. Subsequently,   collapse during the subsequent process, ultimately displaying
            this stress-induced fracturing propagated to the successive   an upward trend. This abrupt collapse exemplifies the
            layer, demonstrating the strain ratio of the lower  layer.   typical failure behavior observed in brittle minimal surface
            Figure 10 further illustrates that while the upper layer of   structures under minimal deformation.
            SGCS suffered damage, the bottom structure retained a   Figure 11 illustrates the fracture morphology of RGCS
            certain level of integrity. The collapse of SGCS proceeded   after the compression test. For RGCS-A0  without heat
            layer by layer, elucidating the serrated stress-strain curve of   treatment, the fracture morphology exhibited the typical
            SGCS depicted in Figure 6B after reaching the failure strain.   river patterns and multiple cleavage steps, accompanied by



            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2024)                         12                             doi: 10.36922/msam.3137
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80