Page 38 - TD-1-2
P. 38

Tumor Discovery                                                  Fact & challenges of immunotherapy in TNBC




            Table 3. Randomized phase III clinical trials of PD‑1/PD‑L1 blockade for metastatic TNBC
            Trial       Sample  Key eligibility  Intervention  ORR      Median PFS   Median OS      Reference
                         size
            IMpassion130  902  1  line mTNBC  Atezolizumab +   ITT      ITT          ITT            Schmid
                                st
            Randomized 1:1,    TFI ≥ 12 months  nab-paclitaxel   56% versus 46%  7.2 versus 5.5   21.0 versus 18.7   et al. [69]
            double-blind,      Any PD-L1 status  versus placebo +   PD-L1-positive IC months  months  Miles et al. [74]
            placebo-                         nab-paclitaxel  59% versus 43%  PD-L1-positive   PD-L1-positive IC
            controlled                                                  IC 7.5 versus 5.0   25.4 versus 17.9
                                                                        months       months
            IMpassion130  651  1  line mTNBC  Atezolizumab   PD-L1-positive IC PD-L1-positive IC PD-L1-positive  Miles et al. [74]
                                st
            Randomized 2:1,    TFI C mTNBC :1,  + paclitaxel   63.4% versus 55.4% 6.0 versus 5.7   28.3 versus 22.1
            double-blind,      Any PD-L1 status  versus placebo +   ITT  months      months I
            placebo-                         nab-paclitaxel  53.6% versus 47.5% ITT  ITT
            controlled                                                  5.7 versus 5.6   22.8 versus 19.2
                                                                        months       months
            KEYNOTE-119   622  2  or 3  line   Pembrolizumab   ITT      ITT          ITT            Oki et al. [75]
                                   rd
                                nd
            Phase III,         mTNBC         monotherapy   9.6% versus 10.6%  2.1 versus 3.3   9.9 versus 10.8 months
            randomized 1:1,    Prior A and T  versus       CPS ≥ 1      months       CPS ≥ 1
            open-label         Any PD-L1 status  chemotherapy of   12.3% versus 9.4%  CPS ≥ 1  10.7 versus 10.2
                                             physician’s choice*  CPS ≥ 10  2.1 versus 3.1   months
                                                           17.7% versus 9.2%  months  CPS 2 months versus
                                                           CPS ≥ 20     CPS ≥ 10 2.1   11.6 months
                                                           26.3% versus 11.5% versus 3.4 months CPS ≥ 20 months
                                                                        CPS ≥ 20 3.4   versus 12.5 months
                                                                        versus 2.4 months
            KEYNOTE-355   847  1  line mTNBC  Pembrolizumab   NR        ITT          NR             Cortes
                                st
            Phase III,         TFI C         + chemotherapy   #         7.5 versus 5.6              et al. [76]
            randomized 2:1,    mTNBCrandoany   versus placebo +         months
            double-blind,      PD-L1         chemotherapy
            placebo-
            controlled
            A: Anthracycline, CPS: Combined positive score, IC: Immune cell, ITT: Intent-to-treat, mTNBC: metastatic TNBC, NR: Not reported, ORR: Objective
            response rate, OS: Overall survival, PD-L1: Programmed death-ligand 1, PFS: Progression-free survival, T: Taxane, TFI: Treatment-free interval.
            *Chemotherapy of physician’s choice could be capecitabine, eribulin, or gemcitabine. #Chemotherapy of physician’s choice could be paclitaxel,
            nab-paclitaxel, or gemcitabine + carboplatinum

            effect on tumor immune response is worth discussing.   usually sensitive to cisplatin treatment. On the other hand,
            Furthermore, more exploratory work needs to be done   the  BL2  subtype  has  abnormal  activation  of  signaling
            to determine whether the possible mechanism above   pathways, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor
            potentially defines a more immunogenic tumor. At   (EGFR), mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET),
            the same time, we should continue to focus on the   nerve growth factor (NGF), Wnt/β-catenin, and insulin-
            heterogeneity of TILs, the subpopulation classification   like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathways, and the
            of T cells, and how their respective molecular pathways   potential targeted therapeutic drugs include mammalian
            regulate immunity [44,73] .                        target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and growth
                                                               factor inhibitors (lapatinib, gefitinib, and cetuximab) .
                                                                                                           [64]
            3.2. Unpredictable personal benefits               Meanwhile, the IM subtype has significantly enriched
            For the purpose of selecting patients who are most likely   immune cell-associated genes and signal transduction
            to benefit from immunotherapy and the development of   pathways, such as the Th1/Th2, NK cell, B-cell receptor,
            combination treatments to overcome drug resistance,   dendritic cell (DC), T-cell receptor, interleukin (IL)-
                                                                                 [78]
            tumor molecular profiling is significant. Through gene   12, and IL-7 pathways ; thus, the IM subtype is highly
            expression profiling analysis of TNBC tumor samples,   similar to medullary carcinoma of the breast. PD1, PDL1,
            abnormal cell cycle-regulating and DNA repair-related   CTLA-4, and other immune checkpoint inhibitors are
            gene expression has been observed in the BL1 subtype .   recommended for the treatment of patients with breast
                                                        [77]
            Possible therapeutic drugs for the BL1 subtype include   cancer of the IM subtype. The M subtype, on the other
            PARP inhibitors and genotoxic agents; BL1  patients are   hand, has highly activated cell migration-related signaling


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         6                       https://doi.org/10.36922/td.v1i2.196
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43