Page 123 - TD-3-4

Tumor Discovery Bioinformatics insights into CCL2 mutations

60. Vieira IHP, Botelho EB, de Souza Gomes TJ, Kist R, resolution experimental information for protein-protein
Caceres RA, Zanchi FB. Visual dynamics: A WEB application docking in Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions
for molecular dynamics simulation using GROMACS. BMC (CAPRI). Proteins. 2013;81(12):2183-2191.
Bioinformatics. 2023;24(1):107.
doi: 10.1002/prot.24435
doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05234-y
71. Martí-Renom MA, Stuart AC, Fiser A, Sánchez R, Melo F,
61. Bagewadi ZK, Khan TM, Gangadharappa B, Kamalapurkar A, Sali A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and
Shamsudeen SM, Yaraguppi DM. Molecular dynamics and genomes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2000;29:291-325.
simulation analysis against superoxide dismutase (SOD) doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291
target of Micrococcus luteus with secondary metabolites
from Bacillus licheniformis recognized by genome mining 72. Shah K, Amanullah A, Qingqing W, et al. Bioinformatics
approach. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2023;30:103753. analysis of missense mutations in CXCR1 implicates altered
protein stability and function. Tumor Discov. 2024;3:2512.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103753
doi: 10.36922/td.2512
62. Shahraki O, Zargari F, Edraki N, Khoshneviszadeh M,
Firuzi O. Molecular dynamics simulation and molecular 73. Sobitan A, Edwards W, Jalal MS, et al. Prediction of the
docking studies of 1,4- dihydropyridines as P-glycoprotein’s effects of missense mutations on human myeloperoxidase
allosteric inhibitors. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2016;36:112-125. protein stability using in silico saturation mutagenesis. Genes
(Basel). 2022;13(8):1412.
doi: 10.1080/07391102.2016.1268976
doi: 10.3390/genes13081412
63. Ferreira LG, Dos Santos RN, Oliva G, Andricopulo AD.
Molecular docking and structure-based drug design 74. Yang J, Zhang Y. Protein structure and function
strategies. Molecules. 2015;20(7):13384-13421. prediction using I‐TASSER. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics.
2015;52:5.8.1-5.8.15.
doi: 10.3390/molecules200713384
doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0508s52
64. Hildebrand PW, Rose AS, Tiemann JKS. Bringing molecular
dynamics simulation data into view. Trends Biochem Sci. 75. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure
2019;44(11):902-913. prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:40.
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2019.06.004 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40
65. Tumskiy RS, Tumskaia AV. Multistep rational molecular 76. Sobolev OV, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, et al. A global
design and combined docking for discovery of novel classes Ramachandran score identifies protein structures with unlikely
of inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease 3CLpro. Chem stereochemistry. Structure. 2020;28(11):1249-1258.e2.
Phys Lett. 2021;780:138894.
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2020.08.005
doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.138894 77. Yang Z, Lasker K, Schneidman-Duhovny D, et al. UCSF
66. Carter P, Andersen CA, Rost B. DSSPcont: Continuous Chimera, MODELLER, and IMP: An integrated modeling
secondary structure assignments for proteins. Nucleic Acids system. J Struct Biol. 2012;179(3):269-278.
Res. 2003;31(13):3293-3295.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.09.006
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg626
78. Wang L, Ding MY, Wang J, Gao JG, Liu RM, Li HT. Effects of
67. Yan Y, Wen Z, Wang X, Huang SY. Addressing recent docking site-directed mutagenesis of cysteine on the structure of sip
challenges: A hybrid strategy to integrate template-based proteins. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:805325.
and free protein-protein docking. Proteins. 2016;85:497-512.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.805325
doi: 10.1002/prot.25234 79. Konrat R, Kräutler B, Weiskirchen R, Bister K. Structure of
68. Case DA, Cheatham TE 3 , Darden T, et al. The Amber cysteine-and glycine-rich protein CRP2. Backbone dynamics
rd
biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem. reveal motional freedom and independent spatial orientation
2005;26(16):1668-1688. of the lim domains. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(36):23233-23240.
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20290 doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.36.23233
69. Huang SY, Zou X. MDockPP: A hierarchical approach 80. Qiu H, Honey DM, Kingsbury JS, et al. Impact of
for protein-protein docking and its application to CAPRI cysteine variants on the structure, activity, and stability
rounds 15-19. Proteins. 2010;78(15):3096-3103. of recombinant human α-galactosidase A. Protein Sci.
2015;24(9):1401-1411.
doi: 10.1002/prot.22797
doi: 10.1002/pro.2719
70. Huang SY, Yan C, Grinter SZ, Chang S, Jiang L, Zou X.
Inclusion of the orientational entropic effect and low- 81. Gerlza T, Winkler S, Atlic A, et al. Designing a mutant CCL2-

Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024) 25 doi: 10.36922/td.3891