Page 10 - TD-4-1
P. 10

Tumor Discovery                                                    EpCAM-targeting cancer immunotherapies



            1. Introduction                                    positive  correlation  between  EpCAM  co-expression  and
                                                               pro-neovascularization growth factors. 9
            Tumor cell-surface receptors (CSR) play a vital role as
            overexpressed biomarkers and are regarded as pivotal   2. Approved and clinical studies of anti-
            targets for cancer immuno-diagnosis and  -therapy.   EpCAM immunotherapies
            A  significant example is the epithelial cell adhesion
            molecule (EpCAM) or CD326. Interestingly, the structural   Almost all types of EpCAM-targeting immunotherapies
            similarities between the human EpCAM antigen and those   have demonstrated remarkable pre-clinical efficacy, and a
            found in mice or other surface markers in the GA733 family   significant number of these treatments have transitioned
            present  challenges in  developing  fully  humanized,  high-  to clinical trials.  Figure  1 shows the mechanism of
            affinity targeting agents against this antigen.  Numerous   action of common EpCAM-specific antibody-based
                                                1
            clinical studies on anti-EpCAM immunotherapeutics have   immunotherapies  that  have  entered  clinical  evaluation.
            yielded inconclusive outcomes, creating uncertainties   Regarding  armed  recombinant  antibodies,  the  toxic
            for future therapy developments aimed at targeting this   (cytolytic) domain fused to the EpCAM-targeting
            differentially overexpressed CSR.                  ligands can be derived from bacterial, human, or plant
                                                               origin. The selection of these sources depends on various
            1.1. Brief biology and function of EpCAM           factors, including immunogenicity, potency, and host of
            EpCAM is a cell surface type  1 transmembrane      expression. Upon release through endosomal escape, the
            glycoprotein belonging to the unique GA733 protein   effector domains cleave their specific substrates, resulting
            family. It is encoded by the TACSTD1 gene and functionally   in the intracellular induction of cell death.
            mediates cell-to-cell adhesion, resulting in intracellular   3. Monoclonal antibodies
            dimerization cascades of major pro-proliferative signaling
            pathways.  EpCAM is expressed on epithelial cells and   This type of monoclonal antibody induces cancer cell
                    2,3
            during the embryonic states in vertebrates, where it is   death by direct immune-related toxicity and disruptions of
            located at tight junctions. In addition, it is responsible   pathophysiological pathways of malignant cells resulting
            for the differentiation and survival of parietal trophoblast   in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Thus, the
            giant cells, the normal development of the placental   EpCAM-specific antibody (IgG1) interacts with the
            labyrinth, and the establishment of competent maternal-
            fetal circulation in vivo. Gene-knockout mice, which died
            in utero, were significantly small-for-age and displayed
            extensive placental abnormalities, highlighting its
            involvement in the embryogenesis of vital organs and body
            structures, such as ear, upper and lower extremities, and
            abdominal organs of vertebrates, signifying the cardinal
            role of the molecule in the physiological processes of fetal
            development.  Structurally, EpCAM (38 kDa) consists of
                       4
            an extracellular cell surface-exposed part (EpEX, 27 kDa),
            transmembrane and intracellular components. The
            intracellular domain, known as the EpIC (3 kDa), is involved
            in ligand-dependent dimerization. The polypeptide chains
            of the EpEX are structurally arranged into three distinctive
            domains: N-domains, thyroglobulin type  1A, and
            C-domains,  known  for  mediating  signal  transductions.
                                                          5
            EpCAM is cleaved mainly at residues Arg80 – Arg81   Figure  1. Mechanism of action of selected EpCAM-specific antibody-
            by proteolytic substrates.   However, detailed structural   based immunotherapies. The anti-EpCAM immunotherapy types consist
                                 6
            analysis showed that its exposed basolateral positions are   of a full antibody or antibody fragment at one end that is specific to the
                                                               EpCAM antigen on cancer cells (red) and binds through the Fc receptor
            covered with glycan side chains, which are involved in   and  recruits  immune  effector  cells  (A),  immunomodulatory  cytokine
            N-linked glycosylation at three sites and harbor epitopes   (B), secondary antibody fragment that binds to T cells through CD3
            that serve as the binding pockets for an affinity ligand.    receptor (C), bacterial (D) or plant toxin as the cytolytic domain (E).
                                                          7
            Recent functional studies have implicated it as a crucial   Adapted from Creative Biolabs available at https://www.creativebiolabs.
            mediator  of  immune  homeostasis  of  the  intestinal  tract   net/adecatumumab-overview.htm.
                                                               Abbreviations: ADCC: Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity;
            by upregulating the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor   EpCAM: Epithelial cell adhesion molecule; IL: Interleukin;
            within the intestinal epithelium.  In addition, there is a   NK cell:  Natural killer cell.
                                      8

            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         2                                 doi: 10.36922/td.4926
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15