Page 34 - TD-4-1
P. 34

Tumor Discovery                                                 Immunohistochemistry profiling of ovarian cysts



               doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0401-1                     tumor patients. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240418.
            88.  Xu HL, Gong TT, Liu FH,  et al. Artificial intelligence      doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240418
               performance in image-based ovarian cancer identification:
               A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine.   91.  Wang Y, Coleman RL. The future of ovarian cancer
               2022;53:101662.                                    screening. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(23):2639-2646.
               doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101662                  doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00048
            89.  Brule AJ, Buist MR, Massuger LF, Rotteveel J, Vergote I,   92.  Holst S, Heeren RM. New horizons in ovarian cancer
               Trimbos JB. Comparison of CA125, HE4, and a multimodal   diagnostics: YKL-40 and mesothelin as potential markers.
               immunocytochemical assay for ovarian cancer risk   Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(10):615-627.
               stratification. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;151(2):353-360.     doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0379-3
               doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.012                93.  Dijmărescu AL, Gheorman V, Manolea MM, et al. Serological
            90.  Leandersson  P,  Åkesson  A,  Hedenfalk  I,  Malander  S,   and immunohistochemical biomarkers for discrimination
               Borgfeldt C. A  multiplex biomarker assay improves the   between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.  Rom J
               diagnostic performance  of HE4 and CA125 in ovarian   Morphol Embryol. 2019;60(4):1163-1174.



























































            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         26                                doi: 10.36922/td.5369
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39