Page 59 - TD-4-3
P. 59

Tumor Discovery                                                      Prognostication in palliative cancer care



            towards decreased survival for those with higher symptom   Table 3. Characteristics of patients who survived days,
            intensity scores. All categories included patients who   weeks, and months
            survived approximately a year or more, as well as patients                Days    Weeks    Months
            who survived <1 week.                                                     (n=14)  (n=65)   (n=68)
            3.5. Characteristics of patients who survived days,                      n   %    n   %   n    %
            weeks, and months                                  Care trajectory
            Fourteen patients (9.5%) survived 0 – 13 days, 65 patients   Ongoing anti-cancer   2  14.3  20  30.8  35  51.5
                                                                treatment
            (44.2%)  survived  14  –  55  days,  and  68  patients  (46.3%)
            survived 56 days or more after admission. The distribution   Palliative care alone  12  85.7  44  67.7  33  48.5
            of the respective care trajectories, ECOG PS categories,   Missing                1   1.5
            mGPS  classes,  and symptom intensity levels  assessed   ECOG PS
            for the study purpose is shown in Table 3. Patients with   1              0   0   4   6.2  11  16.2
            longer actual survival had better functional status and less   2          1  7.1  22  33.8  32  47.1
            systemic inflammation, and anti-cancer treatment was   3                 10  71.4  34  52.3  25  36.8
            withdrawn in most patients who survived only days. No   4                 3  21.4  5  7.7  0   0
            patients with ECOG PS 4 lived for months, and no patients
            with PS 1 survived only days. However, 25 patients with   mGPS
            ECOG PS 3 lived for months or longer, and 22 patients   0                 1  7.1  11  16.9  12  17.6
            with PS 2 survived only weeks. Further analyses (not   1                  3  21.4  29  44.6  43  63.2
            shown in the tables) demonstrated that the percentage of   2             10  71.4  25  38.5  13  19.1
            patients with mGPS 2 was similar (7/25 [28.0%] vs. 6/22   Tiredness
            [27.3%], respectively) in these two groups and that almost   Mild symptom intensity  2  14.3  10  15.4  16  23.5
            one third (6/22 [27.3%]) of patients with PS 2 and only   Higher symptom intensity  12  85.7  55  84.6  52  76.5
            weeks of survival had mGPS 0.
                                                               Loss of appetite
            4. Discussion                                       Mild symptom intensity  3  21.4  25  38.5  28  41.2
            4.1. Statement of principal findings                Higher symptom intensity  11  78.6  40  61.5  40  58.8
                                                               Well-being
            As demonstrated in previously published research,
            ECOG PS status and biomarkers of systemic           Mild symptom intensity  5  35.7  24  36.9  26  38.2
            inflammatory responses  yielded important information   Higher symptom intensity  9  64.3  41  63.1  42  61.8
            for prognostication in patients with advanced cancer.   Drowsiness
            Notably for the clinician, some patients with reduced   Mild symptom intensity  3  21.4  16  24.6  21  30.9
            functional status and systemic inflammation lived for   Higher symptom intensity  11  78.6  49  75.4  47  69.1
            months or longer, and some with better function or little   Dyspnea
            inflammation survived only  days.  Although  no  patients   Mild symptom intensity  6  42.9  34  52.3  44  64.7
            with ECOG PS 4 lived for months and no one with PS 1
            survived only days, the studied factors could not accurately   Higher symptom intensity  8  57.1  31  47.7  24  35.3
            predict the timing of death for the individual patient. In   Abbreviations: ECOG PS: Eastern cooperative oncology group
            this single-center study with a limited number of patients   performance status; mGPS: Modified glasgow prognostic score.
            included, statistically significant survival differences for
            patients with mild and higher intensities of the symptoms   smoking and lung cancer. 34,35  However, retrospective
            under investigation were not demonstrated.         studies are subjected to biases and are unable to display
                                                               causal relationships.  The results should be interpreted with
                                                                               34
            4.2. Appraisal of methods                          caution but may provide hypotheses for future prospective
                                                                     34
            As  evidence-based  practice  is  an  important  basis  for   studies.  The current paper presents secondary analyses
            palliative cancer care, appreciating the study design   of data collected with the intent to describe interventions
                                                                                         33
            employed to answer a particular research question is   and symptom relief in an APCU.  Consequently, the data
            critical.  Retrospective analyses exhibit important design   were gathered for purposes other than to address the study
                  34
                                                                       36
            limitations that should be considered.  However, they   objectives.  In addition, this study did not investigate
                                            34
            have a place in research, earn their utility, and contributed   the recommended use of combinations of techniques to
            to important discoveries, such as the association between   improve prognostication accuracy.  Furthermore, the
                                                                                            6
            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         51                                doi: 10.36922/td.8576
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64