Page 9 - AJWEP-22-5
P. 9

Heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production

                find novel approaches to lower processing and material   the reaction rate during the transesterification process,
                expenses. In this context, heterogeneous catalysts present   catalysts increase the yield of the end product. Most
                a promising alternative to conventional homogeneous   commonly,  these  catalysts  fall  into  one  of  four
                catalysts.  Since 2006, a pilot facility  in France has   categories:  (i) homogeneous, (ii) heterogeneous,
                been  producing 160,000 tons of biodiesel  annually   (iii) enzymatic, and (iv) non-catalytic procedures that
                despite the limited large-scale commercialization in the   operate at supercritical conditions.
                energy sector. Because heterogeneous catalysts are not
                consumed throughout the reaction, they reduce reaction   2.1. Homogeneous acid catalysts
                durations and simplify product separation, making them   Homogeneous acid catalysts are frequently employed
                essential in transesterification processes. 26      in  biodiesel  synthesis  due  to  their  affordability,
                  Nowadays, several  types  of catalysts  are  available   accessibility,  and  fast  reaction  rates.  Base-based  and
                in  the  market,  such as metal  oxides,  mixed  oxides,   acid-based catalysts, with common examples, including
                and  hydrotalcites.   Zeolites,  carbon-based  catalysts,   H SO , NaOH, and KOH,  can be used. According to
                                27
                                                                      2
                                                                         4
                ion exchange resins, and transition  metal  oxides are   research, the main mechanism by which these catalysts
                employed in acidic procedures. However, their three-  function involves a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl
                phase  reaction  system,  which  results  in  diffusion   group.  However, homogeneous catalysts have several
                                                                          31
                constraints  that  obstruct  the  reaction  process,  is  a   limitations,  such  as  higher  costs,  inefficient  use,
                major disadvantage of these heterogeneous catalysts. 28   significant  wastewater  production,  difficulties  in  end-
                In addition,  this system decreases  mass transfer   product  separation,  and  thermal  instability,  as  they
                effectiveness, which is crucial for optimizing reaction   tend to break down at temperatures >150°C.  Table 1
                                                                                                            32
                rates.  Other drawbacks include low active site counts,   summarizes the biodiesel manufacturing process using
                     29
                microporosity,  leaching,  toxicity,  high  expenses,  non-  various solid acid  catalysts,  including  the  sources of
                renewability, and adverse environmental effects. 30  raw materials,  methods  of preparation,  parameters  of
                                                                    the response, and relevant references.
                2. Classification of catalysts                         Alkalized homogeneous catalysts further accelerate
                                                                    transesterification,  which  may  achieve  reaction  rates
                A catalyst speeds up a chemical process without changing   up  to  4,000  times  faster  than  acid-based  catalysts.
                                                                                                                    33
                its  thermodynamic  characteristics.  By  speeding  up   Common alkaline catalysts used in biodiesel production

                 Table 1. Solid acid catalysts for biodiesel production
                 Catalyst                         Feedstocks       Continuous          Reaction operating   References
                                                                   process                 conditions
                                                                   manufacturing     Molar ratio Yield (%)
                 Carbon-derived catalyst          Calophyllum      Pyrolysis            30:1        90        35
                                                  inophyllum oil
                 Cesium phosphotungstate          Oleic acid-soybean  Precipitation     20:1        90        36
                                                  mixture
                 Mn 3.5× Zr 0.5y Al O 3           Waste cooking oil  Co‐precipitation   14:1        75        37
                           x
                 Phosphotungstic acid-poly (glycidyl   Greases     Direct mixing        33:1        96        38
                 methacrylate)-magnetic nanoparticles
                 Anion/cation-exchanged resin     Pure triolein    Neutralization       10:1        96        39
                 SiO ‐SO H/cobalt ferrite         Rambutan oil     Co‐precipitation     20:1        95        40
                    2
                        3
                 M-phenylenediamine-SO₃H-ionic liquid Jatropha oil  Co‐polymerization   50:1        90        41
                 Aluminum chloride hexahydrate    Brown grease     Hydrothermal         10:1        86        42
                 (AlCl ·6H O)
                         2
                     3
                 Organically modified resin-[C HMTA]  Brown grease  Co‐polymerization   40:1        95        43
                                         4
                 [SO H]
                    3
                 Cesium hydrogen phosphotungstate   Sesame oil     Precipitation        40:1        90        44
                 (Cs H PW O )
                           12
                      0.5
                   2.5
                             40
                Volume 22 Issue 5 (2025)                        3                            doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025130095
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14