Page 100 - {PDF Title}

Nzama and Olarewaju

35. Ayeleru OO, Dlova S, Akinribide OJ, et al. Challenges of sorting method. Corporate Soc Responsibil Environ
plastic waste generation and management in sub-Saharan Manag. 2019;26(3):664-680.
Africa: A review. Waste Manag. 2020;110:24-42. doi: 10.1002/csr.1711
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.017 47. Antwi SK, Hamza K. Qualitative and quantitative
36. Macheca AD, Mutuma B, Adalima JL, et al. Perspectives research paradigms in business research: A philosophical
on plastic waste management: Challenges and possible reflection. Eur J Bus Manag. 2015;7(3):217-225.
solutions to ensure its sustainable use. Recycling. 48. Queirós A, Faria D, Almeida F. Strengths and limitations
2024;9(5):77. of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Eur J
doi: 10.3390/recycling9050077 Educ Stud. 2017;3(9):369-387.
37. Aare FF, Tekaron OA, George G. Strategic management doi: 10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1017
of plastic pollution in Nigeria: Balancing best approaches. 49. Robbins G, Velia M. Spatial Elements from a Survey1:
Int J Civil Law Legal Res. 2024;4(1):5-14. Constraints to Growth and Employment facing
doi: 10.22271/civillaw.2024.v4.i1a.58 Medium and Large Manufacturing Firms in eThekwini
38. Jambeck J, Hardesty BD, Brooks AL, et al. Challenges Municipality2. 2015:1-44.
and emerging solutions to the land-based plastic waste 50. Golzar J, Noor S, Tajik O. Convenience sampling. Int J
issue in Africa. Mar Policy. 2018;96:256-263. Educ Language Stud. 2022;1(2):72-77.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.041 doi: 10.22034/ijels.2022.162981
39. European Commission. Waste Framework Directive. 51. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of
2023. Available from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/ convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J
topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-framework-directive_ Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1-4.
en [Last accessed on 2023 May 13]. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
40. Chen JC, Roberts RW. Toward a more coherent 52. Mazhar SA, Anjum R, Anwar AI, Khan AA. Methods of
understanding of the organization- society relationship: data collection: A fundamental tool of research. J Integr
A theoretical consideration for social and environmental Community Health. 2021;10(1):6-10.
accounting research. J Bus Ethics. 2010;97(4):651-665. doi: 10.24321/2319.9113.202101
doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0531-0 53. Young TJ. Questionnaires and Surveys. Research
41. Michelon G, Pilonato S, Ricceri F, Roberts RW. Methods in Intercultural Communication: A Practical
Behind camouflaging: Traditional and innovative Guide. Oxford: Wiley; 2015. p. 163-180.
theoretical perspectives in social and environmental doi: 10.1002/9781119166283.ch11
accounting research. Sustain Account Manag Policy J. 54. Story DA, Tait AR. Survey research. Anesthesiology.
2016;7(1):2-25. 2019;130(2):192-202.
doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0121 55. Sürücü L, Yıkılmaz İ, Maşlakçı A. Exploratory factor
42. Muhammad Jamil CZ, Mohamed R, Muhammad F, analysis (EFA) in quantitative researches and practical
Ali A. Environmental management accounting practices considerations. Gümüşhane Üniv Sağlık Bilimleri Derg.
in small medium manufacturing firms Proc Soc Behav 2022;13(2):947-965.
Sci. 2015;172:619-626. doi: 10.37989/gumussagbil.1183271
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.411 56. Shrestha N. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis.
43. Abobakr MA, Abdel-Kader M, Elbayoumi AF. Am J Appl Math Stat. 2021;9(1):4-11.
Integrating S-ERP systems and lean manufacturing doi: 10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
practices to improve sustainability performance: An 57. Raharjanti NW, Wiguna T, Purwadianto A, et al.
institutional theory perspective. J Account Emerg Econ. Translation, validity and reliability of decision style scale
2023;13(5):870-897. in forensic psychiatric setting in Indonesia. Heliyon.
doi: 10.1108/JAEE-10-2020-0255 2022;8(7):e09810.
44. Chathurangani HBP, Madhusanka KJS. Environmental doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09810
management accounting (EMA) adoption level among 58. Wang L, Li W, Qi L. Stakeholder pressures and corporate
listed manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka: Institutional environmental strategies: A meta-analysis. Sustainability.
theory perspective. Res Soc Sci. 2019;2(1):1-12. 2020;12(3):1172.
45. Wang S, Wang H, Wang J. Exploring the effects doi: 10.3390/su12031172
of institutional pressures on the implementation 59. Zeng H, Li X, Zhou Q, Wang L. Local government
of environmental management accounting: Do top environmental regulatory pressures and corporate
management support and perceived benefit work? Bus environmental strategies: Evidence from natural resource
Strategy Environ. 2019;28(1):233-243. accountability audits in China. Bus Strategy Environ.
doi: 10.1002/bse.2252 2022;31(7):3060-3082.
46. Küçükbay F, Sürücü E. Corporate sustainability doi: 10.1002/bse.3064
performance measurement based on a new multicriteria 60. Aftab J, Abid N, Sarwar H, Veneziani M. Environmental

Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025) 94 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.7089