Page 98 - {PDF Title}

Nzama and Olarewaju

part in the study and limited our sampling to the selected environmental pollution? J Environ Plann Manag.
F&B companies in this developing country. This meant 2023;66(7):1533-1562.
we could not generalize our findings to a developed nation doi: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2033959
as compared to a developing country. Hence, further 2. Hassan OA, Romilly P, Khadaroo I. The impact of
research is required on the same topic to benchmark the corporate environmental management practices on
results with developed nations. There are several areas environmental performance. Bus Ethics Environ
Responsibil. 2024;33(3):449-467.
for further investigation. Another drawback is that the doi: 10.1111/beer.12618
study is mostly descriptive, focusing on correlations 3. Seroka-Stolka O, Fijorek K. Enhancing corporate
rather than causal relationships. A longitudinal study sustainable development: Proactive environmental
to track the progress of firms’ environmental strategy strategy, stakeholder pressure and the moderating effect of
and instruments over time should be considered. firm size. Bus Strategy Environ. 2020;29(6):2338-2354.
A comparison analysis with corporations from other doi: 10.1002/bse.2506
countries would be beneficial to understand the impact 4. Wicaksono AP, Setiawan D. Impacts of stakeholder
of national and cultural variations on sustainability pressure on water disclosure within Asian mining
initiatives. Future studies should focus on panel data and companies. Environ Dev Sustain. 2024;26(3):6493-6515.
doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-02972-0
exogenous interventions to better understand cause and 5. Yin F, Xiao Y, Cao R, Zhang J. Impacts of ESG disclosure
effect in this particular topic. Examining the application on corporate carbon performance: Empirical evidence
of technical breakthroughs such as artificial intelligence from listed companies in heavy pollution industries.
and digitalization in environmental management might Sustainability. 2023;15(21):15296.
help promote sustainability. doi: 10.3390/su152115296
6. Latan H, Jabbour CJC, de Sousa Jabbour ABL,
Acknowledgments Wamba SF, Shahbaz M. Effects of environmental strategy,
environmental uncertainty and top management’s
None. commitment on corporate environmental performance:
The role of environmental management accounting.
Funding J Clean Prod. 2018;180:297-306.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106
None. 7. Chuang SP, Huang SJ. The effect of environmental
corporate social responsibility on environmental
Conflict of interest performance and business competitiveness: The
mediation of green information technology capital. J Bus
Ethics. 2018;150:991-1009.
The authors declare they have no competing interests. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3167-x
8. Wang Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Chen X, Song M. The road
Author contributions to sustainable development: Results of the differentiated
choice of corporate environmental strategy. Sustain Dev.
Conceptualization: All authors 2024;32(4):2990-3003.
Formal analysis: All authors doi: 10.1002/sd.2828
Investigation: All authors 9. Kraus S, Rehman SU, García FJS. Corporate social
Methodology: All authors responsibility and environmental performance:
Supervision: Odunayo M. Olarewaju The mediating role of environmental strategy and
Writing – original draft: Smangele Nzama green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Change.
Writing – review & editing: Odunayo M. Olarewaju 2020;160:120262.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262
10. Sharma S, Aragon-Correa JA. Corporate environmental
Availability of data strategy and competitive advantage: A review from the
past to the future. In: Starik M, Aragn-Correa JA, editors.
Not applicable. Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive
Advantage. Ch. 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
References Ltd., Glos GL50 2JA UK; 2005. p. 1-26.
11. Bresciani S, Oliveira N. Corporate environmental
1. Ren S, Hao Y, Wu H. Digitalization and environment strategy: A must in the new millennium. Int J Bus
governance: Does internet development reduce Environ. 2007;1(4):488-501.

Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025) 92 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.7089