Page 81 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 81

Eco versus traditional denim: LCA analysis

                standards and the detailed impact assessments offered   change,  water  consumption,  terrestrial  acidification,
                by the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) – provides a clear   freshwater eutrophication,  land use, FRS,  and human
                understanding  of the environmental  performance  of   toxicity. In accordance with ISO recommendations, no
                denim  manufacturing  based on current  literature.    normalization or weighting was applied. The research
                                                               28
                This  methodological  integration  not  only  facilitates   framework for this study is illustrated in Figure 1.
                comparison  between  eco-friendly  and  traditional    Key aspects of the LCA methodology – including the
                production techniques but also helps pinpoint targeted   functional unit, system boundaries, life cycle inventory
                areas for improvement.                              (LCI) data, and impact assessment – are described in
                                                                    the subsequent sections, with a focus on study-specific
                1.1. Research gap                                   details.
                Although many studies have examined environmental
                LCAs in textile manufacturing, significant gaps remain,   2.1. Functional unit and system boundary
                especially  in comparing  eco-friendly  and traditional   The functional unit is 1,000 pairs of denim trousers,
                denim manufacturing in Bangladesh. First, despite the   representing a typical production batch at the factory
                application  of ISO 14040/44 criteria  and the ReCiPe   scale.  This upscaled unit captures the aggregated
                2016 Midpoint  (H) method  in  several  studies,  few   environmental load with mass-producing jeans and
                have combined these frameworks in a comprehensive,   provides results relevant to industrial operations.
                cradle-to-grave evaluation encompassing all life cycle   Each pair of denim trousers is made of 100% cotton
                stages. Rather than providing a holistic view that   (approximately 610 g/pair, 3/1 twill, 380 g/m  fabric).
                                                                                                             2
                connects  upstream  and  downstream  effects,  current   The S1 and S2 scenarios provide equivalent functional
                research  often  focuses  on  specific  life  cycle  phases.   performance – 1,000 jeans with an estimated lifetime of
                This fragmentation hampers the ability to fully assess   approximately 200 wear-and-wash cycles per garment.
                the systematic benefits of green innovations in denim   The system boundary is cradle-to-grave (Figure 2),
                production.                                         encompassing all stages from raw material extraction to
                  Second, while there  is extensive  LCA research  in   end-of-life. These stages include:
                developed nations, far fewer studies focus on developing   •  Raw material  production:  Cultivation  of  cotton
                countries  such  as  Bangladesh,  where  adopting  eco-  (mostly  outside  Bangladesh,  with  imports  from
                friendly  manufacturing  practices  presents  unique    India and Pakistan) and the production of auxiliary
                challenges.  This gap is critical,  as the  environmental   materials such as dyes, chemicals, and packaging.
                performance  of eco-friendly  methods can vary      •  Textile manufacturing: Spinning of fiber into yarn,
                significantly  between  developed  and  developing      weaving, indigo dyeing, and finishing of the denim
                contexts. In Bangladesh, where industrial practices are   fabric.
                evolving rapidly, comparative LCAs that reflect local   •  Garment  manufacturing:  Cutting,  sewing,  and
                production  conditions  and  resource  constraints  are   assembly of jeans.
                essential.  Future research should therefore prioritize
                context-specific  investigations  that  go  beyond  merely     Problem definition and research objectives
                benchmarking environmental impacts. Instead, studies
                should consider practical  implications  to better      Goal and scope: Defining functional units and system boundaries
                support the  adoption  of the  LCA approach  by textile    LCI: Lisiting down primary and secondary data sources
                manufacturers.
                                                                     LCIA: ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) assessment of seven environmental impact
                2. Methodology                                                           categories
                                                                         Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis by Monte Carlo simulations
                This study followed the ISO 14040/44 guidelines and
                employed a cradle-to-grave LCA to compare two denim      Results and interpretation: Environmental impact comparisons
                manufacturing scenarios in Bangladesh: A conventional           Statistical analysis: Z-score normalization
                traditional  process (S1) and an eco-friendly  process
                (S2).  The ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method,                  Suggesting practical implications for the industry
                implemented  in openLCA (openLCA:  Version-2.1,     Figure 1. Research framework of the study
                manufacturer-GreenDelta,  Country-Germany),  was    Abbreviations:   LCI:    Life   cycle   inventory;
                used to evaluate  seven impact  categories:  Climate   LCIA: Life cycle impact assessment.



                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        75                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.6241
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86