Page 92 - AJWEP-v22i3

Hossain and Rahman

Recycl. 2015;104:213-223. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=mat-
doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.007 etds [Last accessed on 2024 Aug 23].
4. Periyasamy AP, Wiener J, Militky J. 4 - Life-cycle 16. Fonseca A, Ramalho E, Gouveia A, Henriques R,
assessment of denim. In: Muthu SS, editor. Sustainability Figueiredo F, Nunes J. Systematic insights into a textile
in Denim. The Textile Institute Book Series. Sawston: industry: Reviewing life cycle assessment and eco-
Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 83-110. design. Sustainability. 2023;15(21):15267.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00004-6 doi: 10.3390/su152115267
5. Aslund Hedmann E. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of 17. Aguiar GJA, Almeida LR, Fernandes BS, Gavazza S,
Jeans. Lexington: University of Kentucky Libraries; 2018. Silva GL, Machado Santos S. Use of life cycle assessment
6. Khan AN, Begum MS, Rakib A, Ali A, Ara ZA, as a tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of textile
Ashadujjaman MM. Lifecycle analysis (LCA) of a effluents: A systematic review. Environ Sci Pollution
white cotton t-shirt and investigation of sustainability Res. 2023;30(31):76455-76470.
hot spots : A case study. London J Res Sci Natl Formal doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27785-6
Volume. 2018;18(3):21-31. 18. Rogelj J, Lamboll RD. Substantial reductions in non-CO
2
7. Fidan FŞ, Aydoğan EK, Uzal N. An integrated life cycle greenhouse gas emissions reductions implied by IPCC
assessment approach for denim fabric production using estimates of the remaining carbon budget. Commun
recycled cotton fibers and combined heat and power Earth Environ. 2024;5(1):35.
plant. J Clean Prod. 2021;287:125439. doi: 10.1038/s43247-023-01168-8
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125439 19. Petchchedchoo P, Petcharaks N, Piratrakul P,
8. Periyasamy AP, Militky J. Denim processing and health Wongmuek K. Analysis of the carbon footprint of
hazards. In: Sustainability in Denim. Sawston: Woodhead academic gowns: A case study of Thai University. J Curr
Publishing; 2017. p. 161-196. Sci Technol. 2024;14(2):46.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00007-1 doi: 10.59796/jcst.V14N2.2024.46
9. Mezarcıöz S, Mutlu T, Sarker ME. Effect of sustainable 20. Gade AL, Hauschild MZ, Laurent A. Globally
cotton fibers on denim fabric selected properties. J Natl differentiated effect factors for characterising terrestrial
Fibers. 2022;19(15):10345-10355. acidification in life cycle impact assessment. Sci Total
doi: 10.1080/15440478.2021.1993502 Environ. 2021;761:143280.
10. Annapoorani SG. 1 - Introduction to denim. In: Muthu SS, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143280
editor. Sustainability in Denim. The Textile Institute Book 21. Kumar A, Mishra S, Bakshi S, Upadhyay P, Thakur TK.
Series. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 1-26. Response of eutrophication and water quality drivers on
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00001-0 greenhouse gas emissions in lakes of China: A critical
11. Roy Chowdhury AK. Environmental Impacts of the analysis. Ecohydrology. 2023;16(1):e2483.
Textile Industry and its Assessment through Life Cycle doi: 10.1002/eco.2483
Assessment. Singapore: Springer; 2014. p. 1-39. 22. Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S. Assessing the
doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-110-7-1 environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in
12. Samanta KK, Basak S, Chattopadhyay SK. LCA. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(11):4098-4104.
12 - Environmentally friendly denim processing doi: 10.1021/es802423e
using water-free technologies. In: Muthu SS, editor. 23. Schmidt JH, Weidema BP, Brandão M. A framework
Sustainability in Denim. The Textile Institute Book Series. for modelling indirect land use changes in life cycle
Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2017. p. 319-348. assessment. J Clean Prod. 2015;99:230-238.
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102043-2.00012-5 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.013
13. Hossain KR, Majumder S, Parvez M. “Green 24. Cundubey FS, Azgin ST. Comparative life cycle
Merchandising”-a sustainable approach for apparel assessment of denim manufacturing: Evaluating
business: A review paper. Daffodil Int University J Sci conventional VS. Recycled cotton in the context of
Technol 2019;14:48-52. renewable energy. J Clean Prod. 2024;434:140117.
14. Salazar-Sogamoso LM, Gómez-García MÁ, Dobrosz- doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140117
Gómez I. Comparative life cycle assessment of 25. Hertwich EG, Mateles SF, Pease WS, McKone TE.
sequential chemical and electrochemical processes for Human toxicity potentials for life‐cycle assessment and
the treatment of industrial textile wastewater. J Solid toxics release inventory risk screening. Environ Toxicol
State Electrochem. 2024. Chem. 2001;20(4):928-939.
doi: 10.1007/s10008-024-05976-6 doi: 10.1002/etc.5620200431
15. Hackett T. A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of 26. Shamsuzzaman M, Kashem A, Muhammad Sayem AS,
Denim Jeans and a Cotton T-Shirt: The Production of Khan AM, Shamsuddin S, Islam M. Quantifying
Fast Fashion Essential Items from Cradle to Gate. environmental sustainability of denim garments washing
Thesis; 2015. Available from: https://uknowledge.uky. factories through effluent analysis: A case study in

Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025) 86 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.6241