Page 93 - AJWEP-v22i3
P. 93

Eco versus traditional denim: LCA analysis

                   Bangladesh. J Clean Prod. 2021;290:125740.       36.  Roy PO,  Azevedo LB, Margni M,  Van Zelm  R,
                   doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125740                   Deschênes L, Huijbregts MAJ. Characterization factors
                27.  Rahaman T, Hasan K, Khan SH. Environmental impact   for terrestrial acidification at the global scale: A systematic
                   measurement  and chromatic  performance evaluation   analysis of spatial variability and uncertainty. Sci Total
                   of denim  washing: A  comparison  to conventional  and   Environ. 2014;500-501:270-276.
                   sustainable approaches for cleaner production. Environ      doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.099
                   Sci Pollution Res. 2025;32(10):6110-6129.        37.  Dong Y, Cheng X, Li C, Xu L. Spatially eutrophication
                   doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36099-8                      potential and policy implication of nitrogen emission for
                28.  Khatun M. Life  cycle  assessment of jeans production   surface water: A case study in Guangzhou city, China.
                   using organic  and conventional  cotton.  Tekstilec.   J Environ Manage. 2023;342:118336.
                   2024;67(2):139-150.                                  doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118336
                   doi: 10.14502/tekstilec.67.2023073               38.  Mattila  T, Helin  T,  Antikainen  R, Soimakallio  S,
                29.   Materialien RF. The Life Cycle of a Jean. Understanding   Pingoud  K,  Wessman H.  Land Use  in Life Cycle
                   The Environmental Impact of a Pair of Levi’s 501 Jeans;   Assessment.  Finland:  Finnish  Environment  Institute
                   2015.  Available  from: https://femnet.de/informationen/  SYKE; 2011.
                   materialien-medien/datenbank-der-materialien/    39.  Wang J,  Azam  W. Natural resource scarcity, fossil
                   materialientextile-materialien/4145-the-life-cycle-of-a-  fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas
                   jean-understanding-the-environmental-impact-of-apair-  emissions  in  top  emitting  countries.  Geosci  Front.
                   of-levi-s-501-jeans.html [Last accessed on 2024 Jul 15].  2024;15(2):101757.
                30.  FitzGerald D, Bourgault G,  Vadenbo C,  et al.      doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101757
                   Documentation of Changes Implemented in the Ecoinvent   40.  Igos E, Benetto E, Meyer R, Baustert P, Othoniel B. How
                   Database v3.10. Zürich,  Switzerland:  Ecoinvent     to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies? Int
                   Association; 2023.                                   J Life Cycle Assess. 2019;24(4):794-807.
                31.  Exchange  T. Materials  Market Report  2024.  Textile      doi: 10.1007/s11367-018-1477-1
                   Exchange:  Lamesa,  TX, USA;  2024.  Available  from:   41.  Broadbent PJ, Carr CM, Lewis DM, Rigout ML,
                   https://textileexchange.org/knowledge-center/reports/  Siewers EJ, Shojai Kaveh N. Supercritical carbon dioxide
                   materials-market-report-2024/  [Last  accessed  on  2025   (SC-CO ) dyeing of cellulose acetate: An opportunity
                                                                              2
                   Jan 14].                                             for  a  “greener”  circular  textile  economy.  Coloration
                32.  Exchange  T. Organic Cotton Market Report.  Textile   Technol. 2023;139(4):475-488.
                   Exchange:  Lamesa,  TX, USA;  2022.  Available  from:      doi: 10.1111/cote.12690
                   https://textileexchange.org/knowledge-center/reports/  42.  Nahar N, Haque S, Haque SE. Groundwater conservation,
                   organic-cotton-market-report/  [Last  accessed  on 2025   and recycling and reuse of textile  wastewater in a
                   Jan 14].                                             denim  industry of Bangladesh.  Water  Resour Ind.
                33.  Imran S, Mujtaba MA, Zafar MM,  et al. Assessing   2024;31:100249.
                   the potential  of GHG  emissions for the textile  sector:      doi: 10.1016/j.wri.2024.100249
                   A baseline study. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e22404.    43.  Radhakrishnan  S. Denim  Recycling.  In: Muthu SS,
                   doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22404                   editor.  Textiles  and Clothing Sustainability:  Recycled
                34.  Thistlethwaite G, Karagianni E, Collins A, et al. 2022   and Upcycled Textiles and Fashion. Singapore: Springer;
                   Government Greenhouse Gas Conversion Factors for     2017. p. 79-125.
                   Company Reporting Methodology Paper for Conversion      doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2146-6-3
                   Factors  Draft  Report;  2022.  Available  from:  https://  44.  Valero-Gil J, Surroca JA,  Tribo JA,  Gutierrez L,
                   www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-     Montiel I. Innovation VS. standardization: The conjoint
                   licence [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 04].              effects of eco-innovation and environmental management
                35.  Hoekstra AY. A critique on the water-scarcity weighted   systems on environmental  performance.  Res Policy.
                   water footprint in LCA. Ecol Indic. 2016;66:564-573.  2023;52(4):104737.
                   doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.026                   doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104737

















                Volume 22 Issue 3 (2025)                        87                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.6241
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98