Page 110 - AN-2-2

Advanced Neurology Task oriented walking in stroke

improving the ability of individuals to perform functional self-rate the confidence while performing the activity,
tasks while walking. It is a goal-oriented approach that on a scale of 11 points where 0 indicates no confidence
promotes engagement and motivation and has been shown and 100 complete confidence. The score ranges from 0
to be effective in improving walking ability, balance, and to 100 and the average of these scores reflect the degree
overall functional performance in individuals with various of self-efficacy. In a hospital setting, subjects were asked
neurological conditions. Further, research is needed to to join each group consisting of 72 training sessions,
determine the optimal duration and intensity of this which were provided 3 times a week and for a total of
intervention, as well as its long-term effects on functional 16 weeks. A progressive program of walking intervention
outcomes and quality of life. consisted of nearly 10 tasks, such as standing up, sitting
down on a chair, walking to and along the balance beam,
2. Materials and methods kicking soccer ball against the wall, walking an obstacle
The study was conducted in the Outpatient Department course, performing step-up, walking while carrying
of Physical Therapy, DHQ Hospital, Sargodha. The study object, walking backward, walking at maximum speed,
was completed within 13 months from March 2017 to and walking up and down the stairs. The tasks involving
April 2018. Non-probability purposive sampling technique upper extremity while sitting were included in control
was used to collect the data. A sample size of 30 patients interventions. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) has better
was recruited in this study. The inclusion criteria were as discrimination ability to describe numerous falls. On
follows: diagnosis of stroke, ability to walk at least 10 m the other hand, the implementation with a threshold of
with or without an assistive device, 18 years or older, ≤45 of the BBS, as a dichotomous scale, was insufficient
and ability to understand and follow verbal instructions. for the classification of many people with the risk for
The exclusion criteria were as follows: presence of other falls in the future, with sensitivities of 25% and 45% for
neurological conditions that may affect mobility, presence any fall and for numerous falls, respectively. The use
of other medical conditions that may affect mobility, and of possible ratios, maintaining the BBS as a multilevel
cognitive impairment that may interfere with participation scale, demonstrated a gradient of risk across scores,
in the study. with fall risk increasing as scores decreased [36] . The
test involved 14 subsets, including sitting to standing,
All post-stroke patients with balance impairment, unsupported standing, unsupported sitting, standing
aged 50 – 65 years, were screened for inclusion/exclusion to sitting, transfers, standing with eyes closed, standing
criteria given below. The inclusion criteria are as follows: with both legs, standing on one leg, standing with one
patients with clinical diagnosis of first or the recurrent leg in front, turning 360 degrees, placing feet on stool in
stroke, patients with walking deficit, patients with alternate manner, turning to look behind, and retrieving
evaluated mental competency using the mini-mental object from the floor; the performance of every subset
state examination; telephone version, patients with was assessed on a five-point scale from 0 (no possible
the ability of a 10 m walk independently using aids or improvement) to 4 (normal improvement). Thirty
orthotics with or without supervision, and patients with patients with stroke who met the consolidating standards
the ability to understand the instructions of testing were recruited for examination. All the patients were
procedures. The exclusion criteria are as follows: patients assessed by BBS and ABC scale, and the readings were
with metastatic disease that causes neurological deficit, recorded pre-test and before the treatment. The subjects
patients who regained ability in walking (tested using
the 6-min walk test), patients who become resident in a were assigned into experimental group, which received
permanent care facility, and patients with comorbidities task-oriented walking intervention, and control group,
that impede participation in the intervention. with 15 subjects in each group.
Stratification procedure using comfortable walking Patients in control group were treated with the control
speed and block randomization is described elsewhere. intervention, which involved upper extremity functional
Randomization envelops were prepared by the persons activities. After appropriately setting goal for recuperation,
who were not involved in the study, and these envelops the counselor immediately assessed the patients to perceive
were provided to the evaluator for assessment each time their issues. The experimental group, which received task-
when new subject was available. Activity-specific Balance oriented walking intervention, was given 40 min for each
Confidence (ABC) scale which uses 16 activities-specific session, with three sessions a week. In experimental group
items was used measure the balance self-efficacy. Each (group 2), task-oriented balance training was used to
activity, such as requiring positional change or walking, characterize the targets. Following 16 weeks of treatment
is described by an item. Without losing balance or involving task-oriented intervention, patients were again
without becoming unsteady, patients were asked to evaluated with BBS and ABC scale.

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2023) 4 https://doi.org/10.36922/an.388