Page 11 - AN-3-4
P. 11

Advanced Neurology                                                    LBD prevalence and incidence in India




            Table 1. Studies show the identified prevalence of DLB, PDD, and LBD in India.
                                                 Studies reporting DLB prevalence
            Author      DLB n/dementia n  % DLB  Age x̄  %  Setting location  Cognitive scales  Diagnostic
                                      (95% CI)  (±SD)  Female               Language of administration criteria
            Alladi et al. 18  31/347   8.9%     70.2   34   Patients attending a   MMSE, 26     McKeith et al., 2005
                                     (6.4 – 12.4%)  (±8.0)  memory clinic   “Participant’s native language”
                                                            Hyderabad       ACE-R 29
                                                                            Hindi, Telugu
            Banerjee    1/103          1.0%     71.7   46.7  Community-based   KCSB 27,28       Mega et al. 23
            et al. 19                (0.2 – 5.3%)           survey          Bengali, Hindi
                                                            Kolkata
                                                 Studies reporting PDD prevalence
            Author      PDD n/PD n  % PDD     Age x̄   %    Setting location  Cognitive scales  Diagnostic
                                    (95% CI)  (±SD)  Female                 Language of administration criteria
            Sanyal      68/250         27.2%^   57.9   35.2  Patients attending   MMSE 26       DSM-III-R 24
            et al. 20               (22.1 – 33.0%) (±12.1)  neuromedicine clinic  Not specified
                                                            Kolkata         SCOPA-COG 30
                                                                            Not specified
                                                 Studies reporting LBD prevalence
            Author      LBD n/dementia  % LBD  Age x̄  %    Setting location  Cognitive scales  Diagnostic
                        n           (95% CI)  (±SD)  Female                 Language of administration criteria
            Patel et al. 21  3/125     2.4%      73    40.0  Prescription data from   MMSE 26   DSM-IV 25
                                     (0.8 – 6.8%)  (±0.04)  neurology, medicine,   Not specified
                                                            and psychiatry   FAB 31
                                                            outpatient clinics  Not specified
                                                            Karamasad, Gujarat
            Notes: ^ -27.2% was given in the study; hence, number with PD was calculated.
            Abbreviations: ACE-R: Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised version, DSM-III R: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-3
                                                                                                           rd
            ed..ition–revised, DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-4  ed..ition, FAB: Frontal Assessment Battery, KCSB: Kolkata
                                                                  th
            Cognitive Screening Battery, MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination, SCOPA-COG: Scale for Outcome of PD-Cognition; DLB: Dementia with Lewy
            bodies; PDD: Parkinson’s disease dementia; LBD: Lewy body dementia; SD: Standard deviation; CI: Confidence interval.
            studies utilizing consensus diagnostic criteria for DLB  and   whether these included the use of supportive DLB
                                                      22
            studies in clinical settings rather than community-based   biomarkers, such as  F-fluorinated N-3-fluoropropyl-2-
                                                                                18
            settings had a higher prevalence, which was consistent with   beta-carboxymethoxy-3-beta-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane
            our observation (8.9%). 18                         or cardiac I -metaiodobenzylguanidine, their presumed
                                                                        131
              Notably, the prevalence reported by Allaidi et al. was   use may have supported a high clinical sensitivity in the
            higher than most studies of this type; 12,34  the highest   DLB cohort.
            prevalence study of this type found that DLB comprised   We observed significant methodological heterogeneity
            4.6% of dementia cases in two English cohorts, which used   for the cognitive scales adopted. Although MMSE was
                                                 12
            the same diagnostic criteria as Allaidi  et al.  Although   commonly used, only Allaidi et al. specified that this was
            a smaller sample size might have contributed to Allaidi   administered in the subject’s native language, and of the
            et  al.’s reported value, it could also be explained by   languages in which MMSE was administered, only the Hindi
                                                                                         26
            improved clinical detection  or the possibility that DLB is   translation has been validated.  Other cognitive scales
                                  37
            more common in Indian populations.                 (Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination-revised version and
                                                               KCSB)  were  administered  in  Bengali,  Hindi,  and  Telugu,
              In contrast, the findings of the single study on PDD
            prevalence in our review, where Sanyal  et al. reported   the local languages of the respective geographical areas.
                                                               These observations highlight two major issues for future
            dementia in 27.2% of patients with PD,  closely aligns with   research: harmonization and evidence synthesis of LBD
                                          20
            the pooled frequency of 26.3% reported in a large recent   studies in India. First, India is a highly linguistically
            meta-analysis. 38
                                                               diverse country, with 121 major languages identified in
              Only one study  recorded the use of imaging      the 2011 census.  Even if validated for the most common
                                                                            39
                             18
            techniques. Although no details were provided for   languages spoken, this might contribute to a recruitment
            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         5                                doi: 10.36922/an.4098
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16