Page 75 - AN-4-1

Advanced Neurology Cognitive assessment using performance-based tests

Models of Intervention in Occupational Thearpy. 4 ed. 41. Marson D, Sawrie S, Snyder S, et al. Assessing financial
th
Maryland: AOTA Press; 2018. p. 165-71. capacity in patients with Alzheimer disease: A conceptual
model and prototype instrument. Arch Neurol.
29. Fisher AG. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills 2000;57(6):877-884.
Administration Manual. United States: Occupational
Therapy; 1995. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.6.877
30. Lange B, Spagnolo K, Fowler B. Using the assessment of 42. Martin CR, Triebel EK, Dreer AL, Novack CT, Turner CC,
motor and process skills to measure functional change in Marson CD. Neurocognitive predictors of financial
adults with severe traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Aust capacity in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil.
Occup Ther J. 2009;56:89-96. 2012;27(6):E81-E90.
doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00698.x doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e318273de49
31. Fisher AG. Uniting practice and theory in an occupational 43. Leblanc J, de Guise E, Lamoureux J, et al. Criterion validity of
framework. 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. Am J Occup a functional cognitive task in patients with severe traumatic
Ther. 1998;52(7):509-521. brain injury. Brain Inj. 2012;26(9):1143-1154.
doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.7.509 doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.666922
32. World Health Organization. ICF International Classification 44. Schwartz Y, Sagiv A, Katz N, Averbuch S. English Manual for
of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: the Functional Lowenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive
World Health Organization; 2001. Assessment (FLOTCA). Israel: Lowenstein Rehabilitation
Hospital; 2013.
33. Kielhofner G, Burke JP. A model of human occupation,
Part 1. Conceptual framework and content. Am J Occup 45. Schwartz Y, Averbuch S, Katz N, Sagiv A. Validity of
Ther. 1980;34(9):572-581. the Functional Loewensteinoccupational Therapy
Cognitive Assessment (FLOTCA). Am J Occup Ther.
doi: 10.5014/ajot.34.9.572
2016;70(1):7001290010p1-7.
34. Goverover Y, Deluca J. Actual reality: Using the Internet to doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.016451
assess everyday functioning after traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2015;29(6):715-721. 46. Hartman-Maeir A, Katz N, Baum CM. Cognitive
Functional Evaluation (CFE) process for individuals with
doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1004744
suspected cognitive disabilities. Occup Ther Health Care.
35. Baum CM, Wolf TJ, Wong AWK, et al. Validation and 2009;23(1):1-23.
clinical utility of the executive function performance test in
persons with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. doi: 10.1080/07380570802455516
2017;27(5):603-617. 47. Gneiting A, Christensen B. Development of an Occupation-
based Assessment of Executive Function, Utilising Web-based
doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1176934
Technology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah; 2010.
36. Baum CM, Christiansen C. Occupational Therapy: Overcoming 48. Cardell B, Swain LJ, Burnett A. Construct validity of the
Human Performance Deficits. California: Slack; 1991.
functionally simulated technology task: An exploratory
37. Boyd TM, Sautter SW. Route‐finding: A measure of everyday study. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013;27(4):345-354.
executive functioning in the head‐injured adult. Appl Cogn
Psychol. 1993;7(2):171-181. doi: 10.3109/07380577.2013.845928
49. Novakovic-Agopian T, Chen AJW, Rome S, et al.
doi: 10.1002/acp.2350070208
Rehabilitation of executive functioning with training in
38. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. 5 ed. attention regulation applied to individually defined goals:
th
United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2012. a pilot study bridging theory, assessment, and treatment.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26(5):325-338.
39. Spikman JM, Boelen DHE, Pijnenborg GHM,
Timmerman ME, van der Naalt J, Fasotti L. Who benefits doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181f1ead2
from treatment for executive dysfunction after brain 50. Novakovic-Agopian JWT, Chen JWA, Rome JWS, et al.
injury? Negative effects of emotion recognition deficits. Assessment of subcomponents of executive functioning in
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(6):824-845.
ecologically valid settings: The goal processing scale. J Head
doi: 10.1080/09602011.2013.826138 Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(2):136-146.
40. Shallice TIM, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182691b15
application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain. 51. Manly T, Hawkins K, Evans J, Woldt K, Robertson IH.
1991;114(2):727-741.
Rehabilitation of executive function: Facilitation of effective
doi: 10.1093/brain/114.2.727 goal management on complex tasks using periodic auditory

Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025) 69 doi: 10.36922/an.4508